hadronic mathematics, mechanics and chemistry - Institute for Basic ...

826 RUGGERO MARIA SANTILLIthe plagiarisms, since editors of primary scientific societies are neither stupid nor ignorant. Numerousother plagiarisms of Santilli’s originations are denounced in other footnotes.In this footnote we feel obliged to denounce one of the moist insidious and organized plagiarisms,those on Santilli’s paternity [4] of the symmetry transformations (6.1.9) of the universal invariant (6.1.8).Among numerous plagiarisms of such a paternity scheduled for due prosecution in court, a documentedcase is that perpetrated by the physicists Fabio Cardone (Consiglio Nazionale Ricerche, Rome, Italy),Roberto Mignani (Terza Universita’. Roma, Italy) and Alessio Marrani (Universita’ dell’Aquila, Rome,Italy) under the documented financial and other support by the Istituto Nazionale Fisica Nucleare,Rome, Italy (see thelawsuit at scientificethics.org).said physicists clearly identified Santilli’s paternity [4] of symmetry transformations (6.1.9) and relatedbackground in their works up to 1992, to ignore it altogether in all subsequent works, thanks to theassured complicity by various ”editors”. Santilli attacks without provocation. However, Santilli always”responds” to organized scientific crime. hence, a lawsuit was filed in the U. S. Federal Court, thedistrict in Tampa, Florida, as per public records available at that court with mirror site available atwww.scientificethics.org. These legal actions are only at their initiation at this writing (December 22,2007).The organized scientific crimes in Italy, as well as in England and othrr countries, are denouncedelsewhere. In this footnote we want to have a record of the complicity by Cornell University arXiv. Asone can see in said arXiv under ”Fabio Cardone”, said physicists were allowed by the arXiv the uploadingin the section hep-th (theoretical high energy physics) of a series of papers plagiarizing identically (even inthe symbols) paper [4a], including the Minkowski-Santilli isospace and the Lorentz-Santilli isosymmetry,without any quotation at all of the originating paper published decades earlier! Jointly, the anonymouseditors of Cornell’s arXiv rejected any uploading of Santilli’s papers in the same hep-th, as necessary forcomparison by serious scholars, even though the rejected papers had been accepted for publication inrefereed journals and had been authorized for uploading in hep-th by physicists routinely uploading inthat section, as per self-created ”rules” of the archive. Under such documented evidence, anybody whodoes not admit the existence of an organized scientific crime attempting to control scientific knowledgefor sinister personal gains, is either naive or an accomplice.Evidently, Cornell University is a defendant in the above quoted law suit against the trio Cardone-Mignani-Marrani (see scientificethics.org) because Santilli always ”responds” to acts of organized scientificcrime. What is distressing is the damage caused by the arXiv to the credibility of AmericanScience the world over, since Cornell’s arXiv are presented as fully democratic archives merely intendedfor scientific exchanges, while in reality they are used for the manipulation of scientific knowledge, as itis the case of Wikipedia, the self-appointed ”free” encyclopedia equally used for sinister personal gains(see the footnote at the end of this section).More distressing is the power that has been permitted to be achieved by the organized scientificcrime due to widespread alligiance to the organization, with ensuing absence of controls or interventionby government. Cornell’s arXiv operate under partial financial support by the U. S. National ScienceFoundation. As such, they are obliged to operate in strict verification of U. S. federal Laws. yet, theanonymity of the ”editors” of Cornell’s arXiv is in flagrant violation of aid federal Laws requiring fulltransparency of any action under public U. S. support. Most distressing is the fact that the anonymity ofthe editors of the arXiv is supported by such powerful organization that the president and the librarianof Cornell University have been forced to acquire personal liabilities in their place! Even though thereal names of the real ”editors” are well known to anybody who is minimally informed of said organizedscientific crime, it has been impossible until now to obtain their formal disclosure in the arXiv, in flagrantviolation of U. S. Laws demanding transparency, an occurrence fueling rumors that said organizedscientific crime includes members of U. S. Federal Agencies. Santilli hopes that the latter rumors aredismissed in the only credible way: by U. S. Federal;l Agencies mandating the disclosure of the names ofthe editors of the arXiv. In any case, the pertinent question is: ”Why are the arXiv is operated underanonymity?”, the obvious answer being: ”To protect evil schemes”.Additionally, the public origin of partial funding demands that Cornell’s arXiv operate under strictrules of scientific democracy, the arXiv being mere archives for scientists the world over to exchangeideas and research. To clarify this crucial legal point, the archives do not constitute ”publications” asunderstood in science and, as such, they do not require editorial review of their content, except routine