Introduction Representation in WAsP

ConclusionsHigh displacement and slow decay may allow for a ”hedging of bets”:Mast displacement height is less sensitive to errors on the distance from the trees.”Differential error” between initiation and target mast is reduced on average.This analysis benefits from prior knowledge of the wind regime at the target site.Without such prior knowledge, it is not quite as easy to discriminate between ”good”and ”bad” masts, and thus to determine when we should buy the costly ”high-d,low-s insurance”Can the conclusions from this study be appliedto other sites?to other ways of calculating the displacement height?Future workFinish calculations using Raupach and Choudhury canopy modelsPopulate with a few more sites – good and bad!Further explore (d/h, z 0 , s) parameter spaces = 1:100, 1:200…. 1:∞ as a tactical insurance device?Extreme hedging of bets for bad mastsCalculate a separate displacement height for each sector, apply sector-wiseWhen calculating d, include trees located immediately downwindwind