Porcupine Newsletter Number 25, Winter 2008/09.

More documents

Recommendations

Info

PORCUPINE PIECESNorthward spread of theimmigrant barnacle Elminiusmodestus on the British North SeacoastFrank Evans15 Thirlmere Avenue, North Shields NE30 3UQfrankevans@zooplankton.co.ukFollowing its discovery on test plates inChichester Harbour in 1946 (Bishop, 1947),the immigrant barnacle Elminius modestusspread rapidly along the south and east coastsof England, being recorded by 1948 in suitablelocations between Norfolk and Dorset (Crispand Chipperfield, 1948). Its first arrival inEngland from Australasia was clearly by shipand this type of remote dispersal resulted,as Crisp observed, in the species appearingat first in isolated places, in Holland, theIrish Sea and on the French coast. Later, in1977 a healthy but isolated population wasdiscovered by Hiscock et al. in Vidlin Voe inShetland (Hiscock et al., 1978). At the sametime, spreading up the east coast of England,it had reached the Humber by 1950, where itappeared for a time to halt (Crisp, 1958).But the advance of Elminius was not longinterrupted at the Humber for by 1960 Crisphad reported its presence at Saltburn (54º35’N) near the mouth of the Tees (Crisp, 1960).Following what was clearly a remote dispersalby ship, Elminius was found in the Firth ofForth, supposedly arriving at Rosyth around1958 (Jones, 1961). From there it appearsto have spread rapidly round the Fife coast,reaching Tayport (56º 27’N) on the southside of the Tay by 1961 but south eastwardsextending only as far as Dunbar (56º 00’N).Meanwhile, in 1958 I had discovered asingle colony at Newton-by-the-Sea (55º 31’N)in north Northumberland (Evans, 1958). Atthis time Elminius was present from Dunbarnorthwards and from Saltburn southwardsbut with this single discovery in between.On finding this colony I made a search at adozen sites along the Border coast for furtherexamples but specimens were found only asfar north of Saltburn as West Hartlepool andSeaham (54º 50’N). Apart from at Newton noother animals were discovered as far north asEyemouth (55º 52’N).However, by 1979 the coast betweenSeaham and Dunbar was widely colonised (seeEvans (2000) for Northumberland records)although my return visits from 1970 onwardsshowed that the species was by no means secureat individual sites, Elminius having almostdisappeared, for instance, at Newton. The siteof commonest occurrence in Northumberlandis on the causeway to Holy Island (55º 41’N),where it has been constantly found.In 1981 a visit to the Fife coast found thespecies to be common at a number of sitesbetween Aberdour (56º 03’N) and Tayport. Thebarnacle had by now succeeded in crossing theTay and in this year a few were to be found atBroughty Ferry (56º 28’N) on the north side.Further north, at Arbroath and at Montrose(56º 43’N) it appeared entirely absent.In 2008 a further examination of thecoastline north of the Tay showed a smallextension of the species range. Elminiuswas now present in very small numbers atMontrose. However, visits to Johnshaven (56º48’N) and Gourdon (56º 50’N), a little furthernorth, revealed no examples.Clearly, given its slow advance, the speciesis proceeding northwards under difficultyin the northern North Sea at what may benear the limit of its mainland range, but thefact that it continues to make slow progressindicates some adaptability. There are few sitesin eastern Scotland and northeast Englandwhere it is sufficiently common for significantreproduction to take place but its orderlymovement up the British North Sea coastsuggests nevertheless that new settlement islargely by development although ship dispersal8PMNHS Newsletter No.25 Winterer 2008/09
must not be overlooked. Crisp and Southwardhave discussed the difficulties this intertidalanimal has in crossing even fairly narrow seas(Crisp and Southward, 1953). Sites possiblyto be colonised in the future are Stonehavenand Aberdeen and a watch on these ports isdesirable.A list of sites I have examined, togetherwith dates, has been lodged with the PorcupineRecords Convenor. A more general description ofthe distribution of this barnacle around Britainhas been given by Southward (Southward,2008).ReferencesBishop, M. W. H. 1947. Establishment of animmigrant barnacle in British coastal waters.Nature 159: 260.Crisp, D. J. 1958. The spread of Elminiusmodestus Darwin in north-west Europe. Journalof the Marine Biological Association of the U.K. 37: 483-520.Crisp, D. J. 1960. Northern limits ofElminius modestus in Britain. Nature 188:681.Crisp, D. J. and Chipperfield, P. N. J. 1948.Occurrence of Elminius modestus (Darwin) inBritish waters. Nature 161: 64.Crisp, D. J. and Southward, A. J. 1953.Isolation of intertidal animals by sea barriers.Nature 172: 208-209.Evans, F. 1968. Isolated population ofElminius modestus (Crustacea: Cirripedia) inNorthumberland. Nature 220: 260.Evans, F. 2000. “The Marine Faunaand Flora of the Cullercoats District” Vol. 1.University of Newcastle upon Tyne: 213.Hiscock, K., Hiscock, S. and Baker, J. M.1978. The occurrence of the barnacle Elminiusmodestus in Shetland. Journal of the MarineBiological Association of the U. K. 58: 627-629.Jones, D. H. 1961. Elminius modestus onthe southeast coast of Scotland. Nature 190:103-104.Southward, A.J. 2008. Barnacles. Synopsesof the British Fauna (New Series) 57. FieldStudies Council. 140pp.The NMBAQC Scheme – Friend ofFoe to the Benthic Ecologist?The views expressed here are those of the author and notnedessarily those of PorcupineMyles O’ReillyScottish Environment Protection Agency (SEPA)myles.oreilly@sepa.org.ukIn the Summer 2008 issue of Porcupine(No.24), Peter Garwood presented a PorcupinePiece expressing his personal view on theBEQUALM / NMBAQC Scheme. Peter hasalready made his views known to the NMBAQCcommittee who have responded in some detailon several occasions, providing explanationsand clarifications on all issues he has raised.As much of this discussion post-dates thesubmission of Peter’s article (in Jan 2008)it seems worthwhile to re-iterate somekey points here in order to put the recordstraight on factual matters and to dispel somemisconceptions about the scheme. (Detailedinformation about the origin, purpose, andscope of the scheme is available at www.nmbaqcs.org.uk ).I would like to offer a view of the schemefrom a broader perspective. I am a fellowPorcupiner, and share with Peter, a long heldenthusiasm for taxonomy of marine benthicinvertebrates. However, I also wear additionalhats as an NMBAQC participant, from itsinception 15 years ago, as a senior scientistemployed by the Scottish EnvironmentProtection Agency (SEPA) which is one of theCompetent Monitoring Authorities (CMAs) andalso as a member of the NMBAQC committee.With a foot in all these different camps, I canperhaps appreciate the scheme in its widercontext and espouse some of its positiveattributes.What and who is the NMBAQC Scheme for?The UK National Marine BiologicalAnalytical Quality Control (NMBAQC) Schemewas initially set up by the Department forEnvironment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA)in 1994 to provide a Quality Assurance (QA)scheme for government agencies collectingmarine macrobenthic data as part of theUK National Marine Monitoring Programme(NMMP). No appropriate scheme existedPMNHS Newsletter No.25 Winter 2008/099
Page 1 and 2: PORCUPINE MARINENATURAL HISTORY SOC
Page 3: EditorialHaving completed 10 years
Page 7 and 8: PORCUPINE 2009 Sea Shore to SeaFloo
Page 9: and applicants are expected to fund
Page 13 and 14: in the scheme indicated that they f
Page 15 and 16: all material is in perfect conditio
Page 17 and 18: it grows 4 . The shape of chaetae w
Page 19 and 20: options. (Ed., D. L. Hawksworth) (R
Page 21 and 22: in certain Serpulids (Olive & Clark
Page 23 and 24: Information Requests and Observatio
Page 25 and 26: up around the British Isles. Record
Page 27 and 28: JNCC will continue to lead in the i
Page 29 and 30: survey showed that the highest abun
Page 31 and 32: Marine biodiversity hotspots are ar
Page 33 and 34: Instructions to AuthorsAlthough we

Porcupine Newsletter Number 25, Winter 2008/09.

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?