12.07.2015 Views

murder and involuntary manslaughter - Law Reform Commission

murder and involuntary manslaughter - Law Reform Commission

murder and involuntary manslaughter - Law Reform Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1.20 Professor Ivana Bacik also supports merging <strong>manslaughter</strong> <strong>and</strong><strong>murder</strong> into the single crime of unlawful homicide. Bacik questions whetherhaving a separate offence of <strong>murder</strong> is a true reflection of reality, or isinstead about social stigma. 27 Bacik subscribes to the abolitionist view that a“baseline” offence of homicide would be preferable due to overinclusiveness<strong>and</strong> the moral diversity of killings designated as <strong>murder</strong> on thebasis that the spectrum of intentional killing (which includes contractkillings, mercy killings, revenge killings, child killings <strong>and</strong> domestickillings) is too wide <strong>and</strong> that certain intentional killings eg mercy killingsought not to be br<strong>and</strong>ed as <strong>murder</strong>.(c)Submissions received on the <strong>murder</strong>/<strong>manslaughter</strong> distinction1.21 While the <strong>Commission</strong> received a few submissions in favour ofabolishing the <strong>murder</strong>/<strong>manslaughter</strong> distinction based largely on moraldiversity, cost-cutting, <strong>and</strong> administrative efficiency arguments, the majorityof submissions were broadly supportive of retention because the labelling ofoffences is important <strong>and</strong> labelling is the basis of the distinction between<strong>murder</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>manslaughter</strong>. Most consultees believed that the creation of acomposite crime would seriously devalue the gravity of <strong>murder</strong> in thecriminal law calendar. Though the reverse could in rare circumstances bethe case, the great majority of <strong>murder</strong>s are on their facts substantially moregrievous in nature than those relating to most <strong>manslaughter</strong>s <strong>and</strong> many havea profoundly greater element of blameworthiness.1.22 Several submissions were also received expressing unease that thecreation of a single crime of unlawful homicide would mean that the degreeof culpability would henceforth be determined by the sentencing judgeinstead of by the jury as finders of fact. The result would be an emasculationof the defendant’s right to a trial by jury. The <strong>Commission</strong> also receivedsubmissions which questioned whether having a single crime of homicidewould in fact lead to shorter trials given that the evidential hearing maysimply give way to a lengthy <strong>and</strong> complex sentencing stage.1.23 The <strong>Commission</strong> is of the view that the <strong>murder</strong>/<strong>manslaughter</strong>distinction should be retained.(d)Report Recommendation1.24 The <strong>Commission</strong> recommends that the <strong>murder</strong>/<strong>manslaughter</strong>distinction should be retained.27See Breen “Issue is for politicians not judges, says reform commission” The IrishTimes 30 October 2003.11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!