108 as is d ear trom submissicns to us, dislike lie sexualised advertisements],109(9.9). Currently advertisements aIe regarded legally asprivate property (hence fines for defacing them), rather than asbeing in the public domain. on the grounds that their entirefunction is one of addressing all and sundry whether they choose[Q be so addressed or not. The implications of such an argumentfor legal reform are not considered by rhe Williams Report, andso in thjs sense j t can be seen as not baving tackled the problemsfor those attempting [Q change and challenge existing representations.Other recommendations of the Report may provide new obstacles.Its recommendations are based on a public disavowal of aTEX TU AL STUDIES IN CULTU R A L PR ODUCTIONrepresentational activity that is designa ted 'pornography' by generalFIRST DISCO URSE has as its aim to introduce into the dynami cs o f discourse.opinion. This will mean that the production of such representationsvoices that have been tradition~l1y underrepresented in philosophical . hisroric..I, and theoretical inquiry. We want to emphasize possibilities fo r d ifwill be confirmed as a separa te indus try. difficult to move into.closely linked wi th organised crime. The construction of pornographyas 'J know it exists. nevertheless I choose to ignore it' willference within the repetition which constinues la nguage and cuhural practices,includi ng 61m and television. T herefore, FI RST DI SCOU RSE does notexcl ude la nguage. representation and sexual ity from the definiti on of thedeprive many practitioners of rhe flexibility to move in and outpolitical.of particular forms of signification which is implied by the notionof 'struggle within representations '. Some work will be public.some will be in plain wrappers. behind discreet dOOrs. SuchIssue No . T (ca lled DIS COU RSE ) contains an interv iew with French blmrheoretician Christian Metz, an in tertextual article dealing wHh femininediscourse in l aura Mulvey'S and Peter Wollen's Riddles of the Sphinx, Bertranddesignations will provide institutional determinants upon lheAugst on rhe noti on of disco urse in Michel Foucault. and an article examin ingmeanings that are being produced which will create se\'ererhe concept of di scou rse in the work of jlirgen Haberma s.problems. It may sui t the industry to exchange relaxation ofcontrols on representations for tighter controls on their disseminarion:The ropic of issue No . 2 is Sexual ity: Insights fro m the study of psychoanalnis,but this is bound to create further probl ems for disruptivefeminism, semi oti cs, and social theory are bro ught to the in V'eqigation of thiSd iscu rsive fIeld. Arrides on the fern in ist subiect : Freudi an gender theory; deS ire,representational work in the area of pornography.visua I iry, and power; fe tis hism and n~H Clss ism: spectator identification; plus anThe area of cinema is rhe only medium in which the \Villiamsannotated bibli ograph)' of reccn t lire ratl! re on psychoanalysi s ilnd sexualiry .Report advocates specific censorship mechanisms. It allows that theFuw re iss ues will be on Med ia. the Law. H istorJcal Narr.3t1\·e. Photo~r aphy. anddefence of 'artistic merit' may be applied to films against thethe Politics of Lirerary Production .An earlier version activities of the censor. If tbere is to be censorship of films by aof tillS article .....as Government body, men [his should be a public process, similargiven as a paper[0 [hat used in Weimar Germany. The censorshi p body would haveat the CommunistFor subscription send to : FJ RST D ISCOU RSE. Box I::' \6. 2 000 Center Sneer,Unive rsity ofto publish arguments for specific alterations to films or bans uponBerkeley, CA 94 704London in July fil ms. which \\'ould then be argued OUt with the producers/distributorsin public, if challenged. The potential would rhen be'5.00 institutions~ 14 .00 institutionsI issm::-$4.o0 individuals I ~'e aro r ~ I SS U(;S-~ll.OO indl\'iduals1979. My thanksto all thosepresent for the provided for censorshi p itself to become an area of struggle. rather$6.00 foreign ~ 1 !-i. OO fore i~nsuggestions which than a secre tive and unargued process as it is now.A\:aiIJ ble from SEFThave beenIt is too simple to support the Williams recommendations asNameincorporated here.as well as to they stand merely because they offer a possible liberalisation.InstirurionMaria Black, Ben Similady, it is toO simple co reject direct attacks upon publicBrewster and Film representations because [he form of the attack is often open toStreetC ItyStudies graduatestudents at the accusations of puritanjsm. A politics in relation to pornographyUniversity of must deve lop from a conception of 'pornography' as a particularSrareZ'PKent.artna of representation in which certain displacements, refiguralions,are or can be possible,This iournal is not to be confused with Di!>t.:ourse magazi ne.FIR ;rDIS~~0URSE
110 SCREEN BACK NUMBERS111SCREEN/SCREEN EDUCATION/ SEFTsubscription/membershipFrom Volume 21 Number 1 of <strong>Screen</strong> and Number 34 of <strong>Screen</strong>Education the following subscri ption rates will apply. Any of theseforms of subscription includes membership of SEFT. Both journal sare published quarterly.INDIVIDUALS<strong>Screen</strong> and <strong>Screen</strong> Education<strong>Screen</strong>Scree n EducationINSTITUTIONS<strong>Screen</strong> and <strong>Screen</strong> Education<strong>Screen</strong><strong>Screen</strong> EducationCorporate£10.50 inland; £13/ $26 overseas£7 inland; £10/ $20 overseas£5.50 inland; £7/$14 overseas£15 inland; £18/ $36 overseas£1 0 inland; £12/ $24 overseas£7 inland; £8.50/ $17 overseas£45 inland only(cotporate subscribers receive6 copies of each journal )All su bsc riptions to be prepaid, Prices include surface mail postage,Airmai l rates on request,SINGLE COPIES (including back numbers)<strong>Screen</strong><strong>Screen</strong> Education£1 .95 inland;£1 .50 inland;Ord ers for back numbers must be accompaniedremittance plus 50p/ $1.00 postage per copy.'7~ .....-1T (-1G!~r £3 / 56 overseas£2/54 overseasby 1he exac1Back issues still available £1 .95 inland; [3/$6 overseas. Please add 5Op/ Sl per copy.Vol 15 no 1. SPRING 1974 Fortini: TheWriters Mandate and the End of AntIfascism;Vaughan: The Space Betweenshots: Gardies: Structural Analysis of aTextual SystemVol 15 no 3, AUTUMN 1974 Eikhenbaum:Problems of Film Stylistics; Brik: SelectedWritings; Mulvey and W ollen: interview onPenthesileaVol 15 no 4. WINTER 1974/5: INNERSPEECH Willemen, Levaco on Eikhenbaumand internal speech: Bordwell on Eise nstein;Bellour: The Obvious and the Code. on TheBig Sleep: Hanel : The Narrative Text ofShock Corridor; Hoellering: interview onKuhle WampeVol 16 no 1. SPRING 1975 Heath: Film andSystem - on Touch of Evil ( 1st part): Ellis:on Ealing StudIosVol 16 no 2. SUMMER 1975: PS YCHOANALYS IS SPE CIAL ISSUE Metz: TheImaginary Signifier; Heath: Film and System(cant)VailS no 3, AUTUMN 1975 Mulvey: VisualPleasure and Narrative Cinema; Bellour: TheUnattainable Text ; Rose: on au to-visualisationand Peter Pan; Braniga n: The Point-of·V iew Shot; Buscombe: on Columbia 1926·42;Baxter: on film lighting: Kuhn, J ohnston: onfemin ist politics, criticismVol 16 no 4. WINTER 1975/ 6: BRECHTEV ENT EDIN BURGH FILM FESTIVAL 1975Heath: From Brecht to Film ; Brewster: Brecht(lnd the Film Industry; MacCabe: on 2 au 3Chases and Tout va Bien; Mathers: onBrecht's theatre in Britain; J ohnston andWdlemen: on the independen t political filmdebate on marxism and cultureVol 19 no 1, SPRING 1978 Branigan: 'SubJectivity under Seige', on 8·l and The Seoryof a Man who Lefe his W ilf on Film; Willemen : Notes on Subjectivity; Crofts andEnzensberger, Walsh: on Medvedkin: Porter:on Film Copy rightVol 19 no 2, SUMMER 1978 Straub andilnd Nightcleaners; Penifer: on M utter K rau Huillet. Forrini-Can; script; Com olli: HistoricalFic tion: A Body T oo Much: Thompson:sens FiJhrr /Os GlUck and Kuhle Wampe;Lovell: on lindsay A nderson; M cA rthur; on <strong>Screen</strong> Ac ting and Commutation; Kuhn,Days of HopeBurch: on Documentary ; Brown: on SomeVol 17 no 1, SPRING' 976 Wollen: 'Ontol·ogy' and 'Materialism' in Film; Nowell· Smith:SIX A uthors in Pursuit o f The Searchers;Williilms: on metaphor an d metonomy inH iros/limo LInd Marienbad: Gomery: WarnersLInd Sound; Straub and Hujllet: HistoryLessons and Schoenberg scenarios: MacCabe: response to M c A rthur on Days ofHopeVol 17 no 2. SUM ME R 1976: OZU ISSUEBordwell and Thompson: on s~ace andn Ll rrative in Ozu: Branigan: on t he space ofEquinox Flower; Silvers tone: on structuralanalysis and TV ; Neale : 'New HollywoodCinema'; Cook: 'Exploitation' Film s andFeminismVol 17 no 3, AUTUMN 1976 MacCabe:Pri nciples of Realism and Plea sure, onAmerican Graffiti and The Lump; Nash:Vamp yr and the Fan tastic: Heath: Narra tiveSpaceVol 17 no 4, WINTER 1976/ 7 Heath: AnaraMo, on the Lacanian concept of 'the realand Death by Hanging; Delmar and Nash: onrecent Chinese cinema; Ro se : Paranoia andthe Film System; Ellis: on t he BFt ProductionBoard; Williams: on Un Chien Andalou;Nichols: on Documentary; Nowell-Smith: onNeo· Rea lismVol 18 no 1, SPRING 1977 Crofts an dRose: Man with a Movie Camera ; Raymo ndWilliam s: on Realism: Coward : Class 'Cu lture' and the Social Fo rmation; Cu rling andMclean: on the IFA; Nowell-Smith on Eag letonVol 18 no 2, SUMMER 1977 Heath andSkirrow. TeleVision a World in Action;Mulvey an d Wollen: Riddles of rhe Sphinx- script; Dusinberre: on Peter Gidal"s rhetoricalstrategy; Rosen: on Seventh Heaven;Pollock, Nowell-Smi th on melodra ma; Kuh,,:on Camera Obscura Vol 18 no 3, AUTUM N 1977 Neale: Propaganda; Re es: Conditions of illUSIonism; Drummond: Textual space In Un Chien AndalouVol 18 no 4. WI NTER 1977/ 8 SUTUREISSUE A lain-Mille r, Heath, Dudan : o nSuture; Tribe: History and the PrOduction ofM emorie s; Nash and Neal e: on Edinburgh1977 and Fortini- Cam'; Caughie: on the EdinburghTelevision Fe stival; Chambers et al :Women 0; Marrake ch; Bran igan: reply toWillemenVol 19 no 3, AUTUMN 1978 Heath: onSe xual DIfference and Representation; Ellis: on art cinema in Britain: Pen ley and Bergstrom: on the avant-garde V ol 19 no 4, WINTER 1978/ 9 Wollen: Ph otography; Burch: on primItive cinema; MacCabe: on Discourse: Nowell-Smith: TV and the World Cu p; Eaton, S:tuation Comedy Vol 20 no 1. SPRING 1979 Foucault/ Clayton and Curling: on Authorship; Neale: on Triumph of the Will; Connell' on TV News; M arshall: on Video art: Garnham: on <strong>Screen</strong> Vol 20 no 2, SUMMER 1979 Abbott: Authority; Bellour: on Repetition; Gidal: The A nti-Narrative; Thompson on the A vant-Garde