12.07.2015 Views

Levinas - The Levinas Reader (ed Hand)

Levinas - The Levinas Reader (ed Hand)

Levinas - The Levinas Reader (ed Hand)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1<strong>The</strong> Phenomenological <strong>The</strong>ory of Being'<strong>The</strong> Phenomenological <strong>The</strong>ory of Being: the Absolute Existence of Consciousness'is taken from <strong>Levinas</strong>'s first book, La thiorie de l'intuition dans la phinominologie deHusserl (Paris: Alcan), publish<strong>ed</strong> in 1930. <strong>The</strong> book was subsequently reprint<strong>ed</strong> byVrin in 1963 and 1970 before being publish<strong>ed</strong> in English in 1973 as <strong>The</strong> <strong>The</strong>ory ofIntuition in Husserl's Phenpmenology, translat<strong>ed</strong> by Andre Orianne (Evanston: NorthwesternUniversity Press).While agreeing to the inclusion of this chapter in <strong>The</strong> <strong>Levinas</strong> <strong>Reader</strong>, <strong>Levinas</strong>ask<strong>ed</strong> me to stress that such work is 'ancient history' for him today. It is true that itwas produc<strong>ed</strong> almost sixty years ago while <strong>Levinas</strong> was still emerging from theshadow of his teachers, Husserl and Heidegger, and that in some ways it is still anapprentice piece. But it is of much more than merely historical interest: the bookremains one of the best commentaries ever produc<strong>ed</strong> on Husserl's Ideen I, despitebeing written at a time when Husserl's philosophy was virtually unknown in France.In the late 1920s French philosophy was still dominat<strong>ed</strong> by the pre-war intuitionismof Bergson and the equally conservative rationalism of Brunschvicq, increasingly outof touch with the younger generation of philosophers who were being influenc<strong>ed</strong> bysuch writers as Proust and Valery.<strong>The</strong> ne<strong>ed</strong> to distinguish Husserl's idealism from that of contemporary Frenchidealists, therefore, together with the Heideggerian slant that <strong>Levinas</strong> himselfbrought to bear on his analysis of Husserl's 'intellectualism', condition the way inwhich <strong>Levinas</strong> concentrates on the absoluteness of consciousness. He examines howHusserl moves beyond Descartes's absolute knowl<strong>ed</strong>ge of the existence of consciousnesstowards the absoluteness of consciousness itself, one that exists prior to reflection.Consciousness is a primary domain which thereafter enables us to speak of andunderstand such terms as subject and object. It is the dehistoriciz<strong>ed</strong> nature of thisphenomenological r<strong>ed</strong>uction which <strong>Levinas</strong> will eventually come to criticize.Though locating being in concrete life, Husserl gives himself 'the fre<strong>ed</strong>om oftheory' Even in this early examination of how Husserlian phenomenology overcomesnaturalistic ontology, therefore, we can see the beginnings of the 'difficultfre<strong>ed</strong>om' of <strong>Levinas</strong>'s mature ethics.For further discussion of this early work, one may usefully consult: R. Sokolowski,<strong>The</strong> Formation of Husserl's Concept of Constitution (<strong>The</strong> Hague: Martinus Nijhoff,1964), which makes use of <strong>Levinas</strong>'s interpretations; a review of La tMorie de[,intuition by J. Hering publish<strong>ed</strong> in the Revue Philosophique de la France et de

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!