Marpol_Pvt_Ltd_CA_143_2010 - Company Law Board Mumbai Bench

More documents

Recommendations

Info

622. Ms. Kaya K. Pai Panandikerd/o Kamlesh Pai Panandiker presentlyresiding at 1240 West Monroe St. Chicago,IL 60607 and alternate address being2024 West Walton St. Chicago. IL 60622.23. Mrs. Rajani R. Pai PanandikerW/o Late Ramchandra Pai PanandikerResiding at S/4C Maria Julia, 2 nd floor,Nr. Jawaharlal Nehru StadiumFatorda, Goa – 403 602.…RespondentsANDAtmaram Pai Panandiker CharitableTrust, A Trust registered and formedon 17 th November 1990 having itsregistered office at Margoa, Goa,through its trustee Kamlesh AtmaramPoi Panandikar, having its address atPanandikar Chambers, 3 rd floor,ML Furtado Rpad, Margao,Goa – 403 601.…ApplicantCA No.143 of 2010 in CP 72 of 2008M/s. Marpol Pvt. Ltd.6
7PRESENT FOR PARTIES:1. Shri Shaunak Kashyap, Advocate- For Applicant Trust2. Shri Abhaya Kashyap, Advocate – For 3 and 53. Mr. Iswar Nankani, Advocate – For R6 to 8, 11, 13, 15,16, 19 & 23.4. Shri Atul Rahadhyaksha, Sr. Counsel – For R15. Shri Rahul Chitnis & Shri Pankaj Khode, Advocates- For Petitioner6. Mr. Lalit Jain, Advocate - For R2 and 4O R D E RThe present application is filed praying this bench to implead theapplicant as respondent No.24 in the above company petition andsought direction to rectify the register of the company in order toreflect the applicant’s shares as mentioned in the will. The counselappearing for the applicant trust submitted that the applicant trust is abeneficiary under the will of the late Mr. Atmaram Pai Panandikerunder his Public Testament (Will) dated 30 th September 1993 and isentitled to the shares of this Company belonging to the late Director.The applicant trust was unaware of its being the beneficiary under theCA No.143 of 2010 in CP 72 of 2008M/s. Marpol Pvt. Ltd.7
Page 1 and 2: BEFORE THE COMPANY LAW BOARD,MUMABI
Page 3 and 4: 3M. L. Furtado Road, P.O. No.700,Ma
Page 5: 54 th floor, Opp. Jai Hind College,
Page 9 and 10: 9involved in the instant case and t
Page 11 and 12: 11belatedly by their letter dated 1
Page 13 and 14: 13The same persons viz. the respond
Page 15 and 16: 15proceedings within 3 years from t
Page 17 and 18: 17party to company petition No.72 o
Page 19 and 20: 19of the company to reflect the app
Page 21 and 22: 21Regulation 20. Plural Remedies -
Page 23 and 24: 23filing of an independent petition
Page 25: 25surmises one cannot be added to t

Marpol_Pvt_Ltd_CA_143_2010 - Company Law Board Mumbai Bench

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?