12.07.2015 Views

4. Access of rural women to productive resources in Bangladesh

4. Access of rural women to productive resources in Bangladesh

4. Access of rural women to productive resources in Bangladesh

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

time, rais<strong>in</strong>g social awareness <strong>of</strong> people aboutthe symp<strong>to</strong>ms, causes and consequences <strong>of</strong>oppressive economic, cultural, familial, religiousand legal practices is necessary for chang<strong>in</strong>gtraditional gender roles and m<strong>in</strong>dsets (Acharya,2003).RESEARCH METHODOLOGYLocation <strong>of</strong> the studyThe study was conducted <strong>in</strong> three villages <strong>of</strong>Mymens<strong>in</strong>gh District <strong>in</strong> <strong>Bangladesh</strong>. Thevillages, namely, Boyra, Sutiakhali andDaribhabakhali were selected purposelyconsider<strong>in</strong>g the location <strong>of</strong> <strong>Bangladesh</strong>Agricultural University, <strong>Bangladesh</strong> Institute <strong>of</strong>Nuclear Agriculture and <strong>Bangladesh</strong> FisheriesResearch Institute, good access <strong>to</strong> governmentand non-government services andcommunication facilities. It was assumed that<strong>rural</strong> <strong>women</strong> had better access <strong>to</strong> various<strong>resources</strong> because <strong>of</strong> the level <strong>of</strong> modernisation<strong>in</strong> these villages.Sampl<strong>in</strong>g designThe population for the study consisted <strong>of</strong> themarried <strong>women</strong> <strong>in</strong> farm households <strong>in</strong> thesethree villages. A representative sample <strong>of</strong> 159was drawn (53 from each village) based onarbitrary allocation (Cochran, 1977). Therespondents were selected from different farmhouseholds by random sampl<strong>in</strong>g.Data collection and analysisThe primary data were collected betweenJanuary and March 2007. In order <strong>to</strong> collectqualitative data, three group discussion sessionswere arranged separately <strong>in</strong> three villages; eachgroup conta<strong>in</strong>ed 10 participants. Dur<strong>in</strong>g thesegroup sessions, several open-ended questionswere asked <strong>of</strong> the respondents <strong>in</strong> order <strong>to</strong> collectdeeper <strong>in</strong>formation about their accessibility <strong>to</strong><strong>resources</strong> along with many hidden facts andfac<strong>to</strong>rs. Based on this <strong>in</strong>formation, the research<strong>in</strong>strument was prepared and a pre-test wasconducted with 18 respondents for its necessarymodification. F<strong>in</strong>ally, <strong>in</strong>terviews were made with159 <strong>rural</strong> <strong>women</strong> <strong>in</strong> a face-<strong>to</strong>-face sett<strong>in</strong>g us<strong>in</strong>gthe pre-designed schedule. The respondentswere requested <strong>to</strong> provide <strong>in</strong>formation abouttheir socio-economic condition, accessibility <strong>of</strong><strong>resources</strong> and constra<strong>in</strong>ts <strong>to</strong> these <strong>resources</strong>.Four key <strong>in</strong>formants (one male and one femalecommunity leader, one extension and one NGOpersonnel) were also <strong>in</strong>terviewed <strong>to</strong> give theirexpert views <strong>in</strong> order <strong>to</strong> formulate strategies for<strong>rural</strong> <strong>women</strong>’s empowerment.Books, journals, reports and <strong>in</strong>ternet documentswere used as secondary sources <strong>of</strong> datasupport<strong>in</strong>g or supplement<strong>in</strong>g the empiricalf<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> the study. Data were analyzed us<strong>in</strong>gthe Statistical Package for the Social Science(SPSS) and some descriptive statistics, such aspercentage, mean, standard deviation (SD),coefficient <strong>of</strong> variation (CV) and rank were used<strong>to</strong> <strong>in</strong>terpret the data.Measur<strong>in</strong>g access <strong>to</strong> <strong>productive</strong> <strong>resources</strong>In this study, access means the ability <strong>of</strong> a <strong>rural</strong>woman <strong>to</strong> get seven socio-economic <strong>resources</strong>and accrue benefits from them. The full mean<strong>in</strong>g<strong>of</strong> these <strong>resources</strong> is illustrated below.• <strong>Access</strong> <strong>to</strong> land: power <strong>to</strong> use familyfarmland, ownership <strong>of</strong> land and controlover it.1. <strong>Access</strong> <strong>to</strong> capital:opportunity <strong>to</strong> get loans, micro-credit andbank<strong>in</strong>g services from any formal or<strong>in</strong>formal <strong>in</strong>stitution.2. <strong>Access</strong> <strong>to</strong> extensionservices and tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g: Opportunities <strong>to</strong>develop technical skills for productionthrough tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g and obta<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>formationabout development aspects from anyextension agency.• <strong>Access</strong> <strong>to</strong> technologies: availability <strong>of</strong>cost-effective and appropriatetechnologies for production, post-harvestand household tasks. Thesetechnologies <strong>in</strong>cluded improvedvarieties/breeds, artificial <strong>in</strong>sem<strong>in</strong>ation,vacc<strong>in</strong>es, weeders, threshers, sew<strong>in</strong>gmach<strong>in</strong>es and improved s<strong>to</strong>ves.International Journal <strong>of</strong> Ruralvol. 15 no. 1 April 2008Studies (IJRS)ISSN 1023–2001 www.ivcs.org.uk/IJRS Article 4 Page 3 <strong>of</strong> 8

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!