Health and Disability Commissionerfor some time and the impotence of the position may be contributing to its unpopularity aswell as to the inefficiencies of the ECC.One solution to these inefficiencies is the formation of ―acute medical assessment units‖,where patients go specifically for assessment by acute General Medical teams. The unit isdedicated to this task. Its formation means that the General Medical assessment does notoccur in a place not dedicated to this task (for example, an ED cubicle, or corridor) and oncethe task is complete, the patient moves on (home, or the ward) for the next part of theirjourney. From this paradigm fall a further two principles:5. Important tasks in the patient journey (value added tasks) need an appropriatelystaffed and resourced place dedicated to undertaking that task efficiently andeffectively.6. When the patient has completed that task, he or she moves to the next place, for thenext task.From these 6 principles, solutions can begin to be developed.In <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong>, as in many other parts of the world, a major contributor to ED overcrowdingis the accumulation of in-patients (those needing a hospital bed) in the ED, who cannot yetaccess a hospital bed (access block) either because a bed is not available or becausepermission has not yet been granted to seek one. So both, capacity of the hospital, andprocesses for admission contribute to access block. Both of these are contributors at <strong>North</strong><strong>Shore</strong> <strong>Hospital</strong>.Some argue that it is just about capacity, others argue there are enough beds but the problemis how we use them (processes). Inevitably it is some combination of both capacity andprocesses. An unfortunate consequence of this debate has been the opportunity forinefficiencies of process to be an excuse to avoid investment in capacity.Although I cannot be sure why, I note from the submissions and statements that WaitemataDHB avoided investment in capacity at <strong>North</strong> <strong>Shore</strong> <strong>Hospital</strong>.I am aware of a number of submissions in this regard, but I am aware that these do notrepresent all of the concerns raised. Included in the documentation I examined were a list ofIncident Reports related to overcrowding in the ECC (although the list does not include datesso I am unsure what time period is included), and a ―timeline‖ of events related tooverwhelming of acute services in a document titled ―An account of the pressures faced byWDHB in relation to the provision of services at <strong>North</strong> <strong>Shore</strong> <strong>Hospital</strong> during the periodunder investigation and details of the contingency planning and action taken to address thosepressures‖ which included these items:2002, Review of acute services by [the Inpatient Services Manager], in which a numberof concerns were raised, including concern that length of stay in Observation oftenexceeded 18 hours.2004, Paper, ―Dealing with pressure on <strong>North</strong> <strong>Shore</strong> <strong>Hospital</strong> ECC‖ authored by [theGeneral Manager for Adult Services], outlining concerns re high occupancy of hospital(>100%), and ECC (198%), staff vacancies (21–33%), average ECC Length of stay 11hours (up to 3.9 days).2005, ―ECC flows, team structures and access to medical assessment project plan‖authored by [the Commissioning Project Manager].2005, ―ECC/Acute Assessment project background paper‖ authored by [the Director ofthe Health Improvement Team].126April 2009
Opinion 07HDC217422005, ―Scheduling discharges project description‖ authored by [the CommissioningProject Manager].2005, All staff memo re closing of 34 medical beds across four wards for summermonths. [General Manager for Adult Services].2005, ―Impact of Waitakere ECC remaining closed overnight‖ <strong>report</strong> to Board authoredby [the General Manager for Adult Services].2005, ―Information paper — Expansion of Critical Care‖. Proposal for HDU.2006, Increased overcrowding, with voicing of frustration, and complaints. IncumbentCD of ECC resigned.2006, Media scrutiny and questions in Parliament.2006, ―ECC governance review proposed model draft 2‖ authored by [the DHB ProjectManager].2007, Letter to Ministry re difficulty providing a service due to RMO shortage.2007, ―Business case for PBMA Adult Medical Services Patient Safety and InpatientCapacity‖. Describes high occupancy and very well and strongly worded argument formore beds.2007, ―Strategies for managing a shortage of acute inpatient beds at NSH‖ [GeneralManager for Adult Services], <strong>report</strong> to Board. Requesting funding to open existing beds,and to build new beds.2007, Information paper, Finance and Audit. Observations and discussion on issuesfacing adult health services. Paper for the Board recommending a number of initiatives toincrease bed capacity.In addition, interviews with staff confirmed unrequited requests for assistance. One example,from the transcript of an interview from a staff member, states this:―Dr X felt that governance was a big issue and it was difficult for him to effect change.In 2004 he presented to the Board that overcrowding was an issue, need to plan for morebeds, he did not feel like anyone was listening. The Board seemed to have otherpriorities.‖Another transcript records these comments:―… at the highest level of management (the Board) they did not listen to what they werebeing told and were obstructionist about establishing more beds. It was suggested thatthe Board did not fully grasp the business cases put to them. The Board was requested bysenior staff to provide more beds but focused more on gaining improvements by otherprocess means. They have now, finally got the message that they need more beds. Staffare now desperately trying to hold situation and ‗catch-up‘ over next two years.‖It is apparent that things have changed, as suggested in another quote, and confirmed in otherdiscussions:―… positive changes have resulted from the crises of last year (referring to the eventssubject to this investigation). The Board understands now that beds are a priority. Boardhas been more proactive about beds in last six months.‖Although it is good to see action since the events subject to this investigation, this does notmitigate a lack of action which may have contributed to the problems noted in 2007.April 2009 127