12.07.2015 Views

OPEN PROBLEMS IN TOPOLOGY

OPEN PROBLEMS IN TOPOLOGY

OPEN PROBLEMS IN TOPOLOGY

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Here are some problems that interest me. Most I have worked on; some Ihave not. I have in general avoided listing well-known problems that I amnot particularly associated with, since they surely will be covered elsewherein this volume.A. Normal Moore Space ProblemsTall [1984, 1979] and Fleissner [1984] are good references for normal Moorespaces.Question A1. Is it consistent with 2 ℵ0 = ℵ 2 that every normal Moore space 36. ?is metrizable?It is known to be consistent with 2 ℵ0 being weakly inaccessible (Nyikos[1982], Dow, Tall and Weiss [19∞b]). If—as once conjectured by SteveWatson—2 ℵ0 not weakly inacessible implies the existence of a normal nonmetrizableMoore space, there would be a simple proof of the necessity oflarge cardinals to prove the consistency of the Normal Moore Space Conjecture.The game plan would be to work with Fleissner’s CH example of anormal non-metrizable Moore space (Fleissner [1982]) and weaken the hypothesis.However, Fleissner and I conjecture the other way—namely that theConjecture is consistent with 2 ℵ0 = ℵ 2 . In particular I conjecture that theConjecture holds in the model obtained by Mitchell-collapsing a supercompactcardinal. (For Mitchell collapse, see Mitchell [1972] and Abraham [1983].)There are enough Cohen reals in this model so that normal Moore spacesof cardinality ℵ 1 are metrizable (Dow, Tall and Weiss [19∞b]), so thisconjecture is a “reflection problem”—see below.Question A2. Is it consistent with GCH that normal Moore spaces are 37. ?para-Lindelöf?Aspaceispara-Lindelöf if every open cover has a locally countable openrefinement. This is an attempt to get as much of the Normal Moore SpaceConjecture as possible consistent with GCH. It is done for spaces of cardinality≤ℵ 1 in Tall [1988]. Any consistency proof would likely establishthe consistency with GCH of every first countable countably paracompactsubmetacompact space being para-Lindelöf. Again, this is done for spacesof cardinality ≤ ℵ 1 in Tall [1988]; indeed, first countability is weakenedto character ≤ℵ 1 . It’s consistent with GCH that there’s a normal Moorespace that’s not collectionwise Hausdorff, hence not para-Lindelöf (Devlinand Shelah [1979]).Question A3. Does the existence of a normal non-metrizable Moore space 38. ?imply the existence of one which is in addition is metacompact?23

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!