01.12.2012 Views

The Fly Baby Story - Oshkosh 365

The Fly Baby Story - Oshkosh 365

The Fly Baby Story - Oshkosh 365

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Fokker Triplane Planning<br />

In this view of the miniature construction model, the<br />

original Fokker Triplane structural configuration is evident.<br />

Simplicity is the keynote in this structure.<br />

IN PLANNING the necessary modifications to adapt<br />

the original Fokker Triplane structure to take a modern<br />

reliable engine and make other desirable changes,<br />

I have found it wise to build models to help work out<br />

proposed designs. <strong>The</strong> accompanying photos show a pair<br />

of miniature fuselage frames made for this purpose. One<br />

shows the essentially original Fokker structure while<br />

the other shows its extensively modified counterpart.<br />

In making these models soldered metal construction<br />

proved better and somewhat faster than the conventional<br />

cemented wooden method commonly used for flying<br />

models. When using a scale of IVfe in. equals 1 ft. 0 in.,<br />

which is very convenient for scaling purposes, it will be<br />

found that regular copper-coated mild steel welding rods<br />

of l /s in., 3/32 in. and 1/16 in. diameter correspond to<br />

1 in., % in., and Vz in. tubing sizes. It was found that<br />

steel rods are better suited to this project than comparable<br />

bronze brazing rods, because the steel conducts the<br />

heat of soldering much less rapidly, thus allowing additional<br />

members to be added to a cluster without the<br />

whole joint springing apart. Since the real purpose of the<br />

model is to better visualize different trussing schemes<br />

it becomes an advantage to be able to remove or add<br />

members at will.<br />

"FLY BABY" . . .<br />

(Continued from page 14)<br />

I haven't done any aerobatics in it, mainly because<br />

I'm no good at them. Only Dave Gauthier has. <strong>The</strong>y looked<br />

good from the ground, and he seemed pleased after the<br />

short time he'd tried it. I'll let a real "pro" have a try<br />

at it and give a report later. As for spins, it's a hard<br />

fight to get it into one, and then it comes out by itself.<br />

Stall is clean, with no tendency to drop either wing. With<br />

the wires, it's easy to rig the wings to a bit of wash-out<br />

so that there is plenty of aileron control through the<br />

stall. Load factor? Jim Wickham ran a stress analysis<br />

as the subject of a Chapter 26 EAA meeting, and it came<br />

up as 7.<br />

So there it is. I'll admit that it's not an airplane to<br />

By John Doyle, EAA 2931<br />

P. O. Box 13, Andover, Mass.<br />

Generally, rods should be snipped to approximate<br />

length with heavy diagonal cutters and then filed to<br />

exact dimensions. It's unnecessary to make rounded<br />

notches at the ends of struts as the solder fills the joint<br />

well, but scarves often have to be filed to shape where<br />

clusters occur. Splices, such as shown in the photos immediately<br />

behind the cockpit where the longeron tubes<br />

telescope into each other, are best accomplished by scarfing<br />

both members and soldering them together before<br />

jig assembly. As in the building of the full-size article<br />

a suitable jig is absolutely necessary to align the members<br />

in proper position while soldering is done. <strong>The</strong><br />

Fokker Triplane example lent itself well to the standard<br />

side-frame type of construction. With a simple line<br />

drawing of the frame tacked to a soft pine board 1 in.<br />

by No. 18 brads were driven along both sides of the<br />

members to hold them in place. Other jigs were found<br />

useful to hold the completed side-frames in relative position<br />

while cross pieces were added.<br />

John Doyle's redesigned Fokker Triplane fuselage points<br />

out the heavy reinforcing of the entire structure, especially<br />

in the forward bays to acccommodate a modern,<br />

reliable engine.<br />

A Weller WD-135 soldering gun gave good results,<br />

using 50/50 wire solder and Nokorode Fluid Flux. Acid<br />

type fluxes should be avoided because rusting will occur,<br />

making resoldering operations difficult. Rosin type<br />

fluxes are also apt to prove unsatisfactory for they generally<br />

do not work well on steel.<br />

please everybody, especially those who have had previous<br />

experience with homebuilts and have built up their<br />

own ideas as to just what they want. I think that those<br />

to whom speed and zip aren't so important will find it<br />

"<strong>The</strong> Mostest" airplane that they can produce for the least<br />

investment of money and labor. Careful notes were kept<br />

on both of these. <strong>The</strong> raw materials in the original ship<br />

cost $375, and the "used hardware" consisting of a majored<br />

engine, used metal prop, instruments, wheels,<br />

brakes, fuel tank, etc., came to $675 for a total of $1,050.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se at average market prices in 1960. Good horsetraders<br />

and scroungers can doubtless cut this down considerably.<br />

Time to build "<strong>Fly</strong> <strong>Baby</strong>" the first time, averaging<br />

out the labor skills involved, was 720 hours, which<br />

works out to about two hours a day for a year. £<br />

SPORT AVIATION 15

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!