12.07.2015 Views

Standard Reference Material 2881 - National Institute of Standards ...

Standard Reference Material 2881 - National Institute of Standards ...

Standard Reference Material 2881 - National Institute of Standards ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

An analysis <strong>of</strong> variance (ANOVA) 5 was done on each oligomeric βiassuming theywere independent <strong>of</strong> each other. There are two levels <strong>of</strong> the experimental data to look atthe ANOVA . One is from each two day period when a given pair <strong>of</strong> polymers was run toestimate slope <strong>of</strong> theGGexpTAexpTBversusGGoTAoTBplot. This has been called by us a Polymer-Pair-run. In those runs in which Octyl A was used as one <strong>of</strong> the polymers, we are able toestimate the ANOVA for each <strong>of</strong> the oligomericβi<strong>of</strong> Octyl A. None <strong>of</strong> the spectra usedin this analysis showed any variation in M n or M w as a function <strong>of</strong> concentration <strong>of</strong> one orthe other constituent polymer or as a function <strong>of</strong> the time when the spectra was taken(indicating that the sample preparation solutions did not change during the Polymer-Pairrun).As stated before, the data were checked for concentration dependence <strong>of</strong> themoments M n and M w <strong>of</strong> the MMD. The concentration was randomized for the Polymer-Pair-run collection period with 2 or 3 repeats <strong>of</strong> concentration to check for consistency.The data was analyzed as a function <strong>of</strong> time they were run in the day and/or the order <strong>of</strong>running. None <strong>of</strong> these showed any significant trend in the moments. This alsosuggested the MMD was not changing significantly as a function <strong>of</strong> the overallconcentration <strong>of</strong> polymer in the matrix or <strong>of</strong> the order <strong>of</strong> the running the samples.An analysis <strong>of</strong> variance (ANOVA) 5 was done on each oligomeric βiassuming they wereindependent <strong>of</strong> each other. For these at each concentration ratio five spectra were taken <strong>of</strong> themixture on each sample preparation—making up <strong>of</strong> solution with syringes and electrosprayingthe solution <strong>of</strong> a ratio <strong>of</strong> two polymers with matrix and appropriate Ag salt. For these spectra itwas found that the sample-to-sample variance for the fraction <strong>of</strong> a given oligomeric mass ismuch greater than the within-sample variance where this case within-sample refers to the fiverepeats <strong>of</strong> one spraying and between sample refers to different sprayings and differentgravimetric mixtures. Thus, the computed F values generally ran much higher than thosegenerally expected from the F computed for the each oligomeric species in distribution forα = 0.05 with the appropriate degrees <strong>of</strong> freedom. This computed F is normally called F critical .Assuming the oligomer β are independent one would expect 5% <strong>of</strong> the computed F’s to beiabove F critical . Often as many as 50% <strong>of</strong> the F’s were above F critical suggesting that there is asignificant variation between each sample preparation.30

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!