hidden_voices

Hidden Voices: The CBI, corporate lobbying and sustainability• An independent report prepared by Phillip Hampton for the Treasury looked at reducingthe cost of regulation and was highly critical of studies that claim to estimate the costs ofregulation. It concluded that none of the current estimates were reliable.• Corporate lobbyists’ exaggeration of the costs of complying with regulation that benefitsthe environment is consistent with recent studies (see further reading).The CBI fails to see the big picture.The CBI consistently ignores or plays down the benefits of regulations and particularly theirpositive impact on the environment and people’s health. Instead the CBI tends to reduce alldebates about public policy down to the perceived costs and impacts on profits rather thanaddressing the issue at stake.• A recent Government evaluation of the national air quality strategy found that there wasan estimated 4,225 fewer deaths in the UK as a result of a reduction in air pollutantsbeing emitted due to regulation.• The CBI was able to get significant concessions from Government on the climate changeLevy while failing to offer any practical alternatives to address climate change throughtaxation. It’s estimated by the Government that the climate change Levy could save up tofive mega tonnes of carbon emissions by 2010.• The CBI did admit in their report on environmental regulation that £1.3 billion is investedin capital equipment in the UK each year as a result of meeting environmentalregulations as well as £1 billion generated in environmental consultancies, but includedthe £1.3 billion invested in new equipment as part of the cost of complying withregulations.• There is a global market for environmental goods and services worth in excess of £270billion and growing at 10% annually. Of concern is that the UK only has a 5% share butis falling behind businesses in other countries who use regulation to support growth inenvironmental goods and services.The Government in thrall to CBI.The Government, including senior Ministers as well as Government departments, hasconsistently failed to challenge the CBI claims about job losses or increased costs, despitethe lack of hard evidence provided. As we show in this report there are many industrymisconceptions concerning the cost of implementing regulations that the Government simplyaccepts without contest (as illustrated in Box 6: ‘Key flaws with industry claims about the costof regulation’ page 28).• The CBI successfully lobbied the UK Government to break the limits on greenhousegases that can be emitted by UK industry, which the Government had previously agreedunder the EU emissions trading directive. The UK Government now wants UK industry tobe able to dump an extra 20 million tonnes of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere butthe EU has challenged the UK on whether it can renege on its previous agreement 4 .• The CBI successfully lobbied the DTI to water down anti-corruption and briberyguidelines to be used by their Exports Credit Guarantee Department because ofconcerns over how these proposed guidelines might jeopardise UK arms sales - eventhough this would undermine UK claims to be addressing corruption and bribery inbusiness 5 .• Despite the UK being named as one of the least-regulated countries for business ininternational studies, the Government has consistently responded by proposing even10