140 T. Kalmár-Nagy et al.gives <strong>the</strong> def<strong>in</strong>ition of <strong>the</strong> adjo<strong>in</strong>t operator{−du(γ ),A ∗ dγu(γ ) =γ ∈ (0,τ],L ∗ u(0) + R ∗ u(τ), γ = 0,with <strong>the</strong> two complex conjugate eigenfunctionsA ∗ n(γ ) =−iωIn(γ ),A ∗ ¯n ∗ (γ ) = iωI¯n ∗ (γ ).(A.22)(A.23)Introduc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> real functionsn 1 (γ ) = Re n(γ ),n 2 (γ ) = Im n(γ ).<strong>Equation</strong>s (A.22) and (A.23) can be rewritten asA ∗ n 1 (γ ) = ωIn 2 (γ ),A ∗ n 2 (γ ) =−ωIn 1 (γ ).S<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>Equation</strong> (A.21) requires functions from two different spaces (C 1 [−1,0] and C1 [0,1] )itisa bil<strong>in</strong>ear <strong>for</strong>m <strong>in</strong>stead of an <strong>in</strong>ner product. The ‘orthonormality’ conditions (see <strong>Equation</strong>s(A.8) and (A.9)) are(n 1 , s 1 ) = (n 2 , s 2 ) = 1,(n 2 , s 1 ) = (n 1 , s 2 ) = 0.The new coord<strong>in</strong>ates y 1 , y 2 can be found by <strong>the</strong> projections (<strong>in</strong>stead of <strong>Equation</strong> (A.16))y 1 (t) = y 1t (0) = (n 1 , x t )| ϑ=0 ,y 2 (t) = y 2t (0) = (n 2 , x t )| ϑ=0 .Now x t (ϑ) can be decomposed asx t (ϑ) = y 1 (t)s 1 (ϑ) + y 2 (t)s 2 (ϑ) + w(t)(ϑ)(A.24)and <strong>the</strong> operator differential equation (A.13) can be trans<strong>for</strong>med <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> ‘canonical <strong>for</strong>m’ẏ 1 = (n 1 , ẋ t )| ϑ=0 = (n 1 , Ax t + F (x t ))| ϑ=0= (n 1 , Ax t )| ϑ=0 + (n 1 , F (x t ))| ϑ=0= (A ∗ n 1 , x t )| ϑ=0 + (n 1 , F (x t ))| ϑ=0= ω(n 2 , x t )| ϑ=0 + (n 1 , F (x t ))| ϑ=0 = ωy 2 + n T 1 (0)F,ẏ 2 = (n 2 , ẋ t )| ϑ=0 =−ωy 1 + n T 2 (0), F
<strong>Subcritical</strong> <strong>Hopf</strong> <strong>Bifurcation</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Delay</strong> <strong>Equation</strong> <strong>Model</strong> 141where F = F (y 1 (t)s 1 (0) + y 2 (t)s 2 (0) + w(t)(0)) was used andẇ = d dt (x t − y 1 s 1 − y 2 s 2 ) = Ax t + F (x t ) −ẏ 1 Is 1 −ẏ 2 Is 2= A(y 1 s 1 + y 2 s 2 + w) + F (x t ) −ẏ 1 Is 1 −ẏ 2 Is 2= y 1 (−ωIs 2 ) + y 2 (ωIs 1 ) + Aw + F (x t )− (ωy 2 + n T 1 (0)F)Is 1 − (−ωy 1 + n T 2 (0)F)Is 2= Aw + F (x t ) − n T 1 (0)FIs 1 − n T 2 (0)FIs 2={ ddϑ w − nT 1 (0)Fs 1 − n T 2 (0)Fs 2,ϑ ∈[−τ,0),Lw(0) + Rw(−τ)+ F − n T 1 (0)Fs 1(0) − n T 2 (0)Fs 2(0), ϑ = 0.AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to thank Drs Dave Gils<strong>in</strong>n, Jon Pratt, Richard Rand and Steven Yeung<strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir valuable comments.References1. Burns, T. J. and Davies, M. A., ‘Nonl<strong>in</strong>ear dynamics model <strong>for</strong> chip segmentation <strong>in</strong> mach<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g’, PhysicalReview Letters 79(3), 1997, 447–450.2. Campbell, S. A., Bélair, J., Ohira, T., and Milton, J., ‘Complex dynamics and multistability <strong>in</strong> a dampedoscillator with delayed negative feedback’, Journal of Dynamics and Differential <strong>Equation</strong>s 7, 1995, 213–236.3. Doi, S. and Kato, S., ‘Chatter vibration of la<strong>the</strong> tools’, Transactions of <strong>the</strong> American Society of MechanicalEng<strong>in</strong>eers 78(5), 1956, 1127–1134.4. Fofana, M. S., ‘<strong>Delay</strong> dynamical systems with applications to mach<strong>in</strong>e-tool chatter’, Ph.D. Thesis, Universityof Waterloo, Department of Civil Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g, 1993.5. Guckenheimer, J. and Holmes, P. J., Nonl<strong>in</strong>ear Oscillations, Dynamical Systems, and <strong>Bifurcation</strong>s of VectorFields, Applied Ma<strong>the</strong>matical Sciences, Vol. 42, Spr<strong>in</strong>ger-Verlag, New York, 1986.6. Hale,J.K.,Theory of Functional Differential <strong>Equation</strong>s, Applied Ma<strong>the</strong>matical Sciences, Vol. 3, Spr<strong>in</strong>ger-Verlag, New York, 1977.7. Hassard, B. D., Kazar<strong>in</strong>off, N. D., and Wan, Y. H., Theory and Applications of <strong>Hopf</strong> <strong>Bifurcation</strong>s, LondonMa<strong>the</strong>matical Society Lecture Note Series, Vol. 41, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.8. Johnson, M. A., ‘Nonl<strong>in</strong>ear differential equations with delay as models <strong>for</strong> vibrations <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> mach<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g ofmetals’, Ph.D. Thesis, Cornell University, 1996.9. Kalmár-Nagy, T., Pratt, J. R., Davies, M. A., and Kennedy, M. D., ‘Experimental and analytical <strong>in</strong>vestigationof <strong>the</strong> subcritical <strong>in</strong>stability <strong>in</strong> turn<strong>in</strong>g’, <strong>in</strong> Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs of <strong>the</strong> 1999 ASME Design Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g TechnicalConferences, ASME, New York, 1999, DETC99/VIB80-10, pp. 1–9.10. Kalmár-Nagy, T., Stépán, G., and Moon, F. C., ‘Regenerative mach<strong>in</strong>e tool vibrations’, <strong>in</strong> Dynamics ofCont<strong>in</strong>uous, Discrete and Impulsive Systems, to appear.11. Kuang, Y., <strong>Delay</strong> Differential <strong>Equation</strong>s with Applications <strong>in</strong> Population Dynamics, Ma<strong>the</strong>matics <strong>in</strong> Scienceand Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g, No. 191, Academic Press, New York, 1993.12. Moon, F. C., ‘Chaotic dynamics and fractals <strong>in</strong> material removal processes’, <strong>in</strong> Nonl<strong>in</strong>earity and Chaos <strong>in</strong>Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g Dynamics, J. Thompson and S. Bishop (eds.), Wiley, New York, 1994, pp. 25–37.13. Nayfeh, A., Ch<strong>in</strong>, C., and Pratt, J., ‘Applications of perturbation methods to tool chatter dynamics’, <strong>in</strong>Dynamics and Chaos <strong>in</strong> Manufactur<strong>in</strong>g Processes, F. C. Moon (ed.), Wiley, New York, 1997, pp. 193–213.14. Nayfeh, A. H. and Balachandran, B., Applied Nonl<strong>in</strong>ear Dynamics, Wiley, New York, 1995.