The Importance of Place in Policing - Empirical Evidence and Policy ...
The Importance of Place in Policing - Empirical Evidence and Policy ...
The Importance of Place in Policing - Empirical Evidence and Policy ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
more, Maryl<strong>and</strong> us<strong>in</strong>g a panel design with data collected <strong>in</strong> 1981<strong>and</strong> 1994 (see also Taylor, 2001).<strong>The</strong> most comprehensive exam<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> the stability <strong>of</strong> crime atplace over time was conducted by Weisburd et al. (2004) <strong>in</strong> theirstudy <strong>of</strong> crime <strong>in</strong>cidents at street segments <strong>in</strong> the city <strong>of</strong> Seattle. Us<strong>in</strong>ggroup-based trajectory analysis (Nag<strong>in</strong>, 1999, 2005; Nag<strong>in</strong> &L<strong>and</strong>, 1993) they identified clusters <strong>of</strong> similar developmental trajectories,adopt<strong>in</strong>g an approach that has been used extensively to studypatterns <strong>of</strong> change <strong>in</strong> <strong>of</strong>fend<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> aggression as people age (seeNag<strong>in</strong>, 1999; Nag<strong>in</strong> & Tremblay, 1999).Weisburd <strong>and</strong> colleagues (2004) identified 18 specific trajectorypatterns <strong>in</strong> their data (see Figure 2). <strong>The</strong> most important f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>their study was that crime rema<strong>in</strong>ed fairly stable at places over time.This can be contrasted with developmental studies <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividual<strong>of</strong>fend<strong>in</strong>g where there is <strong>of</strong>ten tremendous change across relativelyshort periods, especially for high rate <strong>of</strong>fenders (Horney, Osgood, &Marshall, 1995; Nag<strong>in</strong>, 1999; Nag<strong>in</strong> & Tremblay, 1999). A comparison<strong>of</strong> a typical trajectory analysis <strong>of</strong> developmental patterns <strong>of</strong>crime among young people (see Figure 3) with the results <strong>of</strong> theSeattle study emphasizes this po<strong>in</strong>t. Note the relative stability <strong>of</strong> themost chronic <strong>of</strong>fend<strong>in</strong>g group <strong>in</strong> the Seattle data (trajectory group17), as contrasted with the chronic <strong>of</strong>fenders identified by Nag<strong>in</strong>(1999) <strong>in</strong> Figure 3.19