12.07.2015 Views

The Importance of Place in Policing - Empirical Evidence and Policy ...

The Importance of Place in Policing - Empirical Evidence and Policy ...

The Importance of Place in Policing - Empirical Evidence and Policy ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

more, Maryl<strong>and</strong> us<strong>in</strong>g a panel design with data collected <strong>in</strong> 1981<strong>and</strong> 1994 (see also Taylor, 2001).<strong>The</strong> most comprehensive exam<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> the stability <strong>of</strong> crime atplace over time was conducted by Weisburd et al. (2004) <strong>in</strong> theirstudy <strong>of</strong> crime <strong>in</strong>cidents at street segments <strong>in</strong> the city <strong>of</strong> Seattle. Us<strong>in</strong>ggroup-based trajectory analysis (Nag<strong>in</strong>, 1999, 2005; Nag<strong>in</strong> &L<strong>and</strong>, 1993) they identified clusters <strong>of</strong> similar developmental trajectories,adopt<strong>in</strong>g an approach that has been used extensively to studypatterns <strong>of</strong> change <strong>in</strong> <strong>of</strong>fend<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> aggression as people age (seeNag<strong>in</strong>, 1999; Nag<strong>in</strong> & Tremblay, 1999).Weisburd <strong>and</strong> colleagues (2004) identified 18 specific trajectorypatterns <strong>in</strong> their data (see Figure 2). <strong>The</strong> most important f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>their study was that crime rema<strong>in</strong>ed fairly stable at places over time.This can be contrasted with developmental studies <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividual<strong>of</strong>fend<strong>in</strong>g where there is <strong>of</strong>ten tremendous change across relativelyshort periods, especially for high rate <strong>of</strong>fenders (Horney, Osgood, &Marshall, 1995; Nag<strong>in</strong>, 1999; Nag<strong>in</strong> & Tremblay, 1999). A comparison<strong>of</strong> a typical trajectory analysis <strong>of</strong> developmental patterns <strong>of</strong>crime among young people (see Figure 3) with the results <strong>of</strong> theSeattle study emphasizes this po<strong>in</strong>t. Note the relative stability <strong>of</strong> themost chronic <strong>of</strong>fend<strong>in</strong>g group <strong>in</strong> the Seattle data (trajectory group17), as contrasted with the chronic <strong>of</strong>fenders identified by Nag<strong>in</strong>(1999) <strong>in</strong> Figure 3.19

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!