sas City Crack House Raids Experiment (Sherman & Rogan,1995a), crackdowns on drug locations were also found to lead tosignificant relative improvements <strong>in</strong> the experimental sites, althoughthe effects (measured by citizen calls <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong>fense reports) were modest<strong>and</strong> decayed <strong>in</strong> a short period. In yet another r<strong>and</strong>omized trial,however, Eck <strong>and</strong> Wartell (1996) found that if the raids were immediatelyfollowed by police contacts with l<strong>and</strong>lords, crime preventionbenefits could be re<strong>in</strong>forced <strong>and</strong> would be susta<strong>in</strong>ed for longer periods.More general crime <strong>and</strong> disorder effects are also reported <strong>in</strong> threeother r<strong>and</strong>omized controlled experiments that tested a more tailored,problem-oriented approach to deal<strong>in</strong>g with crime hot spots. Inthe Jersey City Problem-Oriented Polic<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Violent <strong>Place</strong>s experiment(Braga et al., 1999), strong statistically significant reductions<strong>in</strong> total crime <strong>in</strong>cidents <strong>and</strong> total crime calls were found <strong>in</strong> thetreatment hot spots relative to the control hot spots. Importantly, allcrime categories experienced reductions <strong>and</strong> observational data revealedstatistically significant decl<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong> social <strong>and</strong> physical disorderas well. In the Jersey City Drug Market Analysis Program experiment(Weisburd & Green, 1995a), hot spots polic<strong>in</strong>g tactics werefound to be more effective at reduc<strong>in</strong>g disorder at drug hot spotsthan generalized enforcement. In the Oakl<strong>and</strong> Beat Health study,Mazerolle <strong>and</strong> Roehl (1998) also reported strong reductions <strong>in</strong> crime<strong>and</strong> disorder <strong>in</strong> an experimental evaluation <strong>of</strong> civil remedy <strong>in</strong>terventionsat specific drug-<strong>in</strong>volved locations.Nonexperimental studies provide similar f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs. For <strong>in</strong>stance,the Kansas City Gun Project evaluation (Sherman & Rogan, 1995b)found strong crime control ga<strong>in</strong>s for hot spots polic<strong>in</strong>g approaches.Us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>tensive enforcement <strong>in</strong> an eight by ten block area, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>gtraffic stops <strong>and</strong> searches, Sherman <strong>and</strong> Rogan (1995b) reported a65 percent <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> guns seized by the police <strong>and</strong> a 49 percentdecrease <strong>in</strong> gun crimes <strong>in</strong> the treatment area relative to a matchedcontrol area. Hope (1994) exam<strong>in</strong>ed the effects <strong>of</strong> a problemorientedpolic<strong>in</strong>g strategy, which relied primarily on traditional lawenforcement tactics, on total calls for service <strong>in</strong> three drug hot spotlocations <strong>in</strong> St. Louis, Missouri. <strong>The</strong> evaluation compared total calls<strong>in</strong> the targeted drug hot spots to addresses proximate to the treatmentlocations <strong>and</strong> blocks <strong>in</strong> the surround<strong>in</strong>g areas. Hope (1994)reported significant crime reductions <strong>in</strong> the treatment locationswhen compared to the control locations.This strong body <strong>of</strong> rigorous evaluations led the National ResearchCouncil Committee to Review Research on Police <strong>Policy</strong> <strong>and</strong>Practices to conclude <strong>in</strong> 2004:<strong>The</strong>re has been <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>terest over the past two decades <strong>in</strong>police practices that target very specific types <strong>of</strong> crimes, crimi-37
nals, <strong>and</strong> crime places. In particular, polic<strong>in</strong>g crime hot spots hasbecome a common police strategy for reduc<strong>in</strong>g crime <strong>and</strong> disorderproblems. While there is only prelim<strong>in</strong>ary evidence suggest<strong>in</strong>gthe effectiveness <strong>of</strong> target<strong>in</strong>g specific types <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fenders, a strongbody <strong>of</strong> evidence suggests that tak<strong>in</strong>g a focused geographic approachto crime problems can <strong>in</strong>crease the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> polic<strong>in</strong>g(2004:35).Further evidence <strong>of</strong> the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> hot spots comes from aCampbell Collaboration systematic review conducted by AnthonyBraga (2001, 2005, 2007). A Campbell review <strong>in</strong>volves a more systematicreview <strong>of</strong> the literature than a narrative review <strong>and</strong>, whenappropriate, uses meta-analysis to provide a statistical summary <strong>of</strong>the literature (Lipsey & Wilson, 2001). In keep<strong>in</strong>g with Campbellst<strong>and</strong>ards, eligible studies <strong>in</strong>cluded only those that exam<strong>in</strong>ed crimeplaces that received the hot spots polic<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>tervention compared toplaces that experienced rout<strong>in</strong>e levels <strong>of</strong> traditional police service.N<strong>in</strong>e eligible studies were identified <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> the Campbellreview, several <strong>of</strong> which were described above:1. M<strong>in</strong>neapolis Repeat Call Address Polic<strong>in</strong>g (RECAP) Program(Sherman, Buerger, & Gart<strong>in</strong>, 1989)*2. M<strong>in</strong>neapolis Hot Spots Patrol Program (Sherman & Weisburd,1995)*3. Jersey City Drug Markets Analysis Program (DMAP) (Weisburd& Green, 1995a)*4. Jersey City Problem-Oriented Polic<strong>in</strong>g at Violent <strong>Place</strong>s Project(Braga et al., 1999)*5. St. Louis Problem-Oriented Polic<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Three Drug Market LocationsStudy (Hope, 1994)6. Kansas City Gun Project (Sherman & Rogan, 1995b)7. Kansas City Crack House Police Raids Program (Sherman &Rogan, 1995a)*8. Houston Targeted Beat Program (Caeti, 1999)9. Beenleigh, Australia Calls for Service Project (Crim<strong>in</strong>al JusticeCommission, 1998)<strong>The</strong>se n<strong>in</strong>e evaluations were conducted <strong>in</strong> five large cities <strong>in</strong> theUnited States <strong>and</strong> one suburb <strong>in</strong> Australia. Five <strong>of</strong> the selected studiesused r<strong>and</strong>omized experimental designs (<strong>in</strong>dicated with an asterisk<strong>in</strong> the list above) <strong>and</strong> four used non-equivalent control group quasiexperimentaldesigns. <strong>The</strong> treatments used to prevent crime at hotspots fell <strong>in</strong>to three broad categories: enforcement problem-orientedpolic<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>terventions, directed <strong>and</strong> aggressive patrol programs, <strong>and</strong>police crackdowns <strong>and</strong> raids (see Braga, 2001, 2005, 2007 for more<strong>in</strong>formation on each study).38
- Page 2 and 3: The Importance of Place inPolicingE
- Page 4: ContentsForeword ..................
- Page 7 and 8: eport note for example that this ne
- Page 9 and 10: 8licing. By place, we do not mean l
- Page 12 and 13: II. The Emergence of CrimePlaces in
- Page 14 and 15: For many scholars and policymakers,
- Page 16 and 17: III. The Concentration ofCrime at P
- Page 18 and 19: viduals. Using his Minneapolis data
- Page 20 and 21: more, Maryland using a panel design
- Page 22 and 23: Figure 3: Trajectories of Individua
- Page 24 and 25: V. The Importance of Place-Based Ra
- Page 26 and 27: Figure 5: Kernel Density Estimation
- Page 28 and 29: Perhaps the most comprehensive geog
- Page 30 and 31: masked if we focused our interest o
- Page 32 and 33: such places. For example, several r
- Page 34 and 35: Sampson et al., 1997; Sampson, 2004
- Page 36 and 37: Table 3: Relationship Between Numbe
- Page 40 and 41: The Campbell review reported notewo
- Page 42 and 43: VIII. Does Crime Just MoveAround th
- Page 44 and 45: prevention effect. The Campbell sys
- Page 46 and 47: know. This way, if I need help, I k
- Page 48 and 49: IX. Reducing LegalConstraints while
- Page 50 and 51: X. Recognizing theImportance of Pol
- Page 52 and 53: esidents and business owners in hig
- Page 54 and 55: demands a fundamental change in the
- Page 56 and 57: concern of police to improving plac
- Page 58 and 59: ReferencesAgnew R., & Peterson D. M
- Page 60 and 61: Bushway, S. D., Thornberry, T. P.,
- Page 62 and 63: Estricht, S., Moore, M. H., McGilli
- Page 64 and 65: Mastrofski, S. M., Weisburd, D., &
- Page 66 and 67: Sherman, L. W. (1990). Police crack
- Page 68 and 69: Evaluating public policy initiative