1 board for industrial and financial reconstruction ma no. 553/bc ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

M.A. NO. 553/BC/2011CASE NO. 516/92M/S. HINDUSTAN FERTILIZER CORPN. LTD.application should be served on the Ministry of Chemicals andFertililzers also.(v) The company and Kolkatta Port Trust (KPT) should keep BIFRinformed of the status of the appeal filed by KPT in Hon ble AAIFR.(vi) West Bengal Agro Industries Corporation Ltd. may file theirimpleadement application in this case under copy to the company.(vii) The next hearing will be held on 8.3.2010.1.9. The company filed an M.A. No. 275/BC/2009 registered on 3.12.2009 seekingdirection to the Ministry of Shipping and KOPT to implement the decisions takenduring meeting dated 22.4.2009. In the hearing held on 11.12.2009, the company sM.A. No. 275/BC/2009 registered on 3.12.2009 was dismissed for non-prosecution.1.10 The company has filed an M.A. No. 98/BC/2010 registered on 18.2.2010seeking direction to the Ministry of Shipping and KOPT to implement the decisionstaken during meeting dated 22.4.2009.1.11. Shri Siddharth Gautam, Advocate on behalf of West Bengal Agro-IndustriesCorporation Ltd. vide letter dated 3.3.2010 has filed an MA No. 134//BC/2010 datedregistered on 3.3.2010 seeking permission of the Board u/s 22 (1) of SICA. Herequested the Board to list the application on 8.3.2010.1.12. In the hearing held on 8.3.2010, the Bench issued the following directions:-8
M.A. NO. 553/BC/2011CASE NO. 516/92M/S. HINDUSTAN FERTILIZER CORPN. LTD.(a)The company to submit its DRS u/s 17 (2) of the Act with the consent of theparties from whom reliefs and concessions are envisaged in the DRS, withinthree months to the Board.(b)In the hearing held on 11.12.2009, the Bench had dismissed the company sM.A. No. 275/BC/2009 seeking a direction to the Ministry of Shipping andKPT to implement the decisions taken in the meeting held on 22.4.2009, fornon-prosecution.The company vide its M.A. No. 98/BC/2009 has againmade a similar request.The Bench observed that since the Board hadalready issued order on an application, it could not revise its orders.(c)In the hearing held on 6.10.2009, the M.A. No. 142/BC/2009 filed by WestBengal Agro-Industries Corporation Ltd. (WBAICL) seeking permission of theBoard u/s 22 (1) of the Act was dismissed for non-prosecution. WBAICL filedanother M.A. No. 134/BC/2010 with a similar request. The Bench observedthat once the Board had issued order on an application, it could not revise itsorders.(d)the Ministry of Environment & Forests to expedite its decision on thecompany s application for environmental clearance within two months.(e)GAIL to furnish the time schedule for gas linkages to the company within twomonths.(g)the company provide civic amenities to its townships and submit its reportalongwith its comments on the request of the State Government and theworkers to transfer the township to the State Government within two monthsto the Board.9
Page 1 and 2: M.A. NO. 553/BC/2011CASE NO. 516/92
Page 7: M.A. NO. 553/BC/2011CASE NO. 516/92
Page 13: M.A. NO. 553/BC/2011CASE NO. 516/92

1 board for industrial and financial reconstruction ma no. 553/bc ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?