12.07.2015 Views

Model Theory of Differential Fields

Model Theory of Differential Fields

Model Theory of Differential Fields

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

MODEL THEORY OF DIFFERENTIAL FIELDS 61Theorem 4.1. If X ⊂ K n is strongly minimal and non-locally modular, thenX is non-orthogonal to the constants.The pro<strong>of</strong> proceeds by first showing that strongly minimal sets in differentiallyclosed field are Zariski geometries, in the sense <strong>of</strong> [Hrushovski and Zilber 1996].The main theorem on Zariski geometries says that non-locally modular Zariskigeometries are non-orthogonal to definable fields, but the only finite rank definablefield is, by Theorem 3.7, the constants.Hrushovski and Sokolovic also showed that nontrivial locally modular stronglyminimal sets arise naturally in studying abelian varieties as differential algebraicgroups. In his pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Mordell conjecture for function fields, Manin provedthe following result.Theorem 4.2. If A is an abelian variety, then there is a nontrivial differentialalgebraic group homomorphism µ : A → K n .For example, if A is the elliptic curve y 2 = x(x−1)(x−λ), where δ(λ) = 0, thenµ(x, y) = δ(x)y .If δ(λ) ≠ 0, then µ is a second order differential operator. Let A # be the δ-closure <strong>of</strong> the torsion points <strong>of</strong> A. We can choose µ so that A # is the kernel <strong>of</strong> µ.Building on 4.2 and further work <strong>of</strong> Buium, Hrushovski and Sokolovic showed:Theorem 4.3. Suppose A is a simple abelian variety defined over K. Either(i) A is isomorphic to an abelian variety B defined over the constants, or(ii) A # is locally modular and strongly minimal.Moreover, any nontrivial locally modular strongly minimal set is non-orthogonalto A # for some such A, and A # and B # are non-orthogonal if and only if A andB are isogenous.Thus Hrushovski and Sokolovic have completely characterized the nontrivialstrongly minimal sets. Understanding the trivial ones is still a difficult openproblem. We say that a strongly minimal set X is ℵ 0 -categorical if in any modelthe dimension <strong>of</strong> the elements <strong>of</strong> the model in X is infinite. One open questionis: In DCF is every trivial strongly minimal set ℵ 0 -categorical? Hrushovski hasproved this for strongly minimal sets <strong>of</strong> transcendence degree one.5. Diophantine ApplicationsHrushovski used Theorem 4.3 in his pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Mordell–Lang conjecture forfunction fields in characteristic zero.Theorem 5.1. Suppose K ⊃ k are algebraically closed fields <strong>of</strong> characteristiczero, A is an abelian variety defined over K such that no infinite subabelian

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!