Irate StudentOn <strong>the</strong> last day <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> term, I leftmy purse next to <strong>the</strong> catalogue in<strong>the</strong> overnight library. I returnedto look for it five minutes laterand it was gone. It had clearlybeen picked up by somebody,and I thought that <strong>the</strong>y wouldprobably return it after taking<strong>the</strong> cash, as it contained mystudent card and various o<strong>the</strong>rdocuments.A few days later, I came toWits especially to use <strong>the</strong> library.I inquired at CBl, but my pursehad not been handed in.I went to <strong>the</strong> library, partly tosee if my purse had turned up, butwas refused admittance. I tried toexplain that my card was possiblyinside, but <strong>the</strong> guard refusedto listen.My day was wasted, as I didnot have <strong>the</strong> money needed tomake a new card <strong>the</strong>n and <strong>the</strong>re.The next day I went to <strong>the</strong>trouble and expense <strong>of</strong> getting anew one, and <strong>the</strong>reby finallygained admission to <strong>the</strong> library.As soon as I got in, I inquired formy purse at <strong>the</strong> desk, and foundthat it had been handed in twodays earlier. lt was cashless, butmv card was <strong>the</strong>re.If <strong>the</strong> bureaucracy at Wits wasa little less intransigent, it wouldsave students a great deal <strong>of</strong>time,money, energy and frustration.Irate 3rd year student\14VOW furore rattles all concernedI, in my personal capacity as LiveMusic and Personnel manageron <strong>the</strong> Voice <strong>of</strong> Wits, object to<strong>the</strong> way in which your Newspaperand its editorial boardoperate.Besides <strong>the</strong> fact that you seemto be very out <strong>of</strong> touch withstudent needs and concerns o/rcampus you also show littleregard for o<strong>the</strong>r SRC subcommittees.The letter, written by PaulJammy, which appeared in youMarch 30th edition was deflamatory.Mr Jammy has beenassociated with llits Studentsince 1982 and I feel <strong>the</strong> sentimentsexpressed in his letter werethose <strong>of</strong> lVits Student. (lt mightinterest you to know that MrJammy approached me, six daysafter <strong>the</strong> publication <strong>of</strong> his letter,his intention being to join <strong>the</strong>Voice <strong>of</strong> Wits).A strange turn <strong>of</strong> events inanybody's language. In future Ifeel it would be more beneficial ifyour newspaper published areply to any letter you decide topublish concerning VOW. Areply or statement by VOW in <strong>the</strong>same addition would help topresent both sides <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> issue.Something which Wits Studentseems incapable <strong>of</strong> doing on itsoh'n,TB GravesWe feel that it highly stuPid <strong>of</strong>Wits Student to Publish defamatoryletters about SRC subcommitteesand student societieswithout approaching <strong>the</strong> societyin question beforehand. It wouldbe a lot more beneficial to allstudents if a leply to <strong>the</strong> letterwas published in <strong>the</strong> same editionso that both sides <strong>of</strong> an issue arepresented for perusal by allconcerned. ln <strong>the</strong> Wits Student<strong>of</strong> 30 March a defamatory letterwas published with regard to <strong>the</strong>most popular SRC sub-commirtee, Voice <strong>of</strong> Wits. Voice <strong>of</strong> Witswere not approached for commenton <strong>the</strong> issue and <strong>the</strong>refore aslanted r€port appeared whichharmed <strong>the</strong> image <strong>of</strong> this studentservice. We assume that VOWrvould have had suitable answersto squash any complaints directedtowards <strong>the</strong>m. In future lookbefore you leap, <strong>the</strong>re may becrocodiles in <strong>the</strong> water.In All FairnessEng IIIBA IIILLB IIBCom.lIDrama IIThe views expressed in MrJammy's letter were in fact hispersonal opinions. The letter wasin no way defamatory butmerely questioned whe<strong>the</strong>r VOWdoes provide an dternative tocommerciel music stetions ornot.Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, <strong>the</strong> hystericalresponse from VOW and itssupporters over Mr JammY'sletter has led us to conduct acampus opinion poll on VOW'which can be found in <strong>the</strong> NewsSection <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> paper.The decision as to whe<strong>the</strong>r aletter deserves a reply alongsidc itdepends, es in all newsPrpers' ondeedline constreints and <strong>the</strong>discretion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> editors. TheWits Studenl letters pagesexpress a renge <strong>of</strong> opinion andcomment and we welcome lettersfrom all our readers. We call onreaders who perhaps hold differentviews to those <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> paper,<strong>the</strong> use our letters pages toexpress <strong>the</strong>m.EdsHeyta Projects!I would like to congratulate <strong>the</strong>people <strong>of</strong> Projects Comm for <strong>the</strong>informative mass meeting heldon Thursday 26 April entitled'Can <strong>the</strong>re be peace while <strong>the</strong>re isapar<strong>the</strong>id?'It was a refreshing changefrom <strong>the</strong> usual pattern <strong>of</strong> meetings,although <strong>the</strong>re have beenra;e exceptrons'ln <strong>the</strong> past, tohear a painstakingly researchedand articulately documented discussion<strong>of</strong> South Africa's recentpeace initiatives with her neighboursand her lack <strong>of</strong> peaceinitiatives with <strong>the</strong> majority <strong>of</strong>South Africans.The object <strong>of</strong> a mass meetingshould be to inform and educate<strong>the</strong> audience. while raising issuesfor informal discussion as well,ra<strong>the</strong>r than to create mild hysteriathrough vague and emotionalrantings and ravings about <strong>the</strong>(real) inequalities <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> apar<strong>the</strong>idreeime! 'I SarakinskyROBOTS ROBOTS ROBOTThe Impact <strong>of</strong> RoboticsSRC mustsort outl.l .uDrary lssueThis letter comes a bit late, after adelay <strong>of</strong> a month, but at that ameaningful delay.My letter comes in response toMichael Gering's letter headlined'Open those library doors to all'(Wirs Studen I Vol <strong>36</strong> No 5). Thisletter concretized many feelings(and thoughts) which I hadexperienced before its enlighteningmoment only at a subliminalor gut level.Every time I walked intoWartenweiler my stomach tightenedslightly as I took myIdentity Card out to show to a'Security Officer'. Now <strong>the</strong> samething happens at William Cullen- <strong>the</strong> Security Guard a responseto 'What <strong>the</strong> hell is going on?'( I|zS Vol <strong>36</strong> No 3), an articlewhich called for more security atWits?Now I see <strong>the</strong> fact that I have topresent my identity card as an actin which I partake (sic) in <strong>the</strong>suppression <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r people'saspirations.And thus I see only onesolution:The SRC has to be challengedto take up this struggle. One,which in a very concrete manner,articulates <strong>the</strong> Nusas <strong>the</strong>me for1984'Students meeting <strong>the</strong>Challenge <strong>of</strong> Change'. This letteris thus <strong>the</strong> first challenge to <strong>the</strong>SRC to do precisely this.And now is <strong>the</strong> time to dealwith <strong>the</strong> reason for <strong>the</strong> delay inwriting this letter: for a monthafter Gering's letter nothing hascome from <strong>the</strong> SRC in <strong>the</strong>customary form <strong>of</strong> leaflets or ameeting or even a motion.I thus call on <strong>the</strong> SRC to reactto this challenge - do somethingeven rationalize on <strong>the</strong>grounds <strong>of</strong> practicality, butplease don't remain silent.Silence can be a crime,remember.Open-up0pen up, Tober!As a graduate student andmember <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> academic staff, Iusually work on campus overweekends. Good research is a fulltime job.On Friday 614184 <strong>the</strong> new(improved) parking <strong>of</strong>ficerstopped me and intimated thatunder vice chancellor's orders,nei<strong>the</strong>r staff nor students maypark on campus without specialpermission. This order was for<strong>the</strong> duration <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Rand show.I put it to you that, whe<strong>the</strong>rPr<strong>of</strong>essor Tober likes it or not,Wits is an acadernic institution. Itis just not on to close <strong>the</strong><strong>University</strong> for two and a halfweeks in a working year <strong>of</strong> fiftyand an academic year <strong>of</strong> thirty.
Artsilla: Penetrating <strong>the</strong> Piazza,)xec,, but<strong>the</strong>ari 11,; <strong>the</strong>I notwithsaiditsandlanstres.for,00onhe)m<strong>of</strong>reral5einrd1trp'qAn exhibition <strong>of</strong> Edoardo wrthout being polished. TheVilta's sculpture can be viewedoccasional acid-corroded areaon <strong>the</strong> Piazza until <strong>the</strong> 30th adds textural variation.June.At <strong>the</strong> opening, Mr Villa saiciReaction has been varied that it took 4-5 months, averagingl8-20 hours a day to(Engineering students constructed<strong>the</strong>ir own 'masterpiece' in complete a major work. Whenresponse). The sculptures, as a asked for fur<strong>the</strong>r comment, hewhole, are a unique syn<strong>the</strong>sis <strong>of</strong> smiled and said,'not tonight'. Allorganic and mechanical forms. in all, an exhibition no studentThey stand at <strong>the</strong> meeting point can mlss.<strong>of</strong> art and technology and seem The Wits Student surveyorsto be a celebration <strong>of</strong> our modernindustrial society.The harsh angles and size <strong>of</strong>many <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> works make <strong>the</strong>maggressive, alienating and attimes almost fascist. There is verylittle horizontal emphasis whichheightens <strong>the</strong> celebratory upwardthrust <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> works, as well asallowing <strong>the</strong>m to intimidate usfur<strong>the</strong>r.Certain pieces have definitephallic infererlces (we need notelaborate on <strong>the</strong> 'Thrust' series).Yet even <strong>the</strong>se are cluttered withprotective devices. Jail-like barsand 'armour plating' deny anyhumanity inherent in <strong>the</strong> sculptures.This is essentially art aboutconflict. The geometric andorganic elements are in constantopposition. lt also sets out toexplore <strong>the</strong> nature an possibilities<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> media, <strong>the</strong> relationshipsbetween positive and negatlvespaces.None <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sculptures are freestanding.thus fur<strong>the</strong>r alienating<strong>the</strong>m from <strong>the</strong>ir surroundings.The base however is <strong>of</strong>tenintegrated and this helps balance<strong>the</strong> somewhat top-heavy nature<strong>of</strong> many <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> works. Theconstruction technique, weldingand finish are superb. The worksare subtly coloured withoutlosing <strong>the</strong>ir metallic qualities.The surface s are faily smoothT,JNIYERSITY OF TIIE WITWATERSRAJ\IDD€pafiment <strong>of</strong> Russlan StudlesD€partment <strong>of</strong> Engltsh Studlesln assoctrtton *'lthThe Universlty Playerspnes€ntr i't fihit campus extracting sculpturedopinions. Stretchingacross <strong>the</strong> breadth <strong>of</strong>campus,f,doardo's sculptures onceagain raise <strong>the</strong> question thathas baffled millions: 'ls thisart?'Sean M and Bruce Y saidthat 'Art is a waste <strong>of</strong> time' andthat <strong>the</strong>re were'too many sculptures.. . and <strong>the</strong>y're dangerous'.DA's opinion was that '<strong>the</strong>y'recertainly noticeable. but Idon'tappreciate sculptures. They detractfrom <strong>the</strong> peacefulness <strong>of</strong>campus'. A passerby was quotedas saying: 'They're cute. I thinkWits should buy a few.' SWMjust said:'Rubbish'.The pair <strong>of</strong> S Taylors remarkedthat '<strong>the</strong>y are free-standingscrap-piles. and belong in ajunk5 ard . . . but <strong>the</strong> weldings aregood.' Ano<strong>the</strong>r person commented:'Why don't <strong>the</strong>y bring back<strong>the</strong> treesJ At least <strong>the</strong>y giveshade!' Gail Ford and JanHjor<strong>the</strong>n: 'Where else can vouPut <strong>the</strong>m'? - <strong>the</strong>Y're dreadtul!'Startled at our approach. MCand TC said: 'We haven't reallylooked at <strong>the</strong>m'. Someone in ared-striped T-shirt uttered oneword: 'Sucks!' A pair <strong>of</strong> Niketakkies said: 'A cult o1'<strong>the</strong>grotesque. Ugliness has becomean art. They're grrreat!'Makes vou think. doesn't it'?THE GOVERNI'{ENTINSPECTORby Nikolai G<strong>of</strong>oldirected by Jo:epb SberrryauDOWNSTAIRS AT THEWITS TTIEATREShall I compare <strong>the</strong>e to a summer's doy?InspectorspectreEver wondered what actuallYwent on in Tsarist Russie?Nicholai Gogol's PlaY 'The'The Government Inspector'should enlighten you. It is ebiting farce about life before<strong>the</strong> l917 Revolution. Thepleyis set in a small Russian townduring <strong>the</strong> rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> lastTsar.The plot revolves around ayoung dandy <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> town whom<strong>the</strong> bureaucrats mistake for agovernment inspector. They<strong>the</strong>refore treat him with obsequiousreverence. The ensuingstiuations are potentiallyhilarious.The play is also concerned withhuman self-interest and how