12.07.2015 Views

Supermax Prisons and the Constitution: Liability ... - Supermaxed

Supermax Prisons and the Constitution: Liability ... - Supermaxed

Supermax Prisons and the Constitution: Liability ... - Supermaxed

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

25Wisconsin corrections officials had developed■Quality assurance. Consider developing aa screening tool, but <strong>the</strong> court was very criticalof how <strong>the</strong> tool was applied. Should anagency attempt to rely entirely on a st<strong>and</strong>ardizedscreening instrument? Or should it com-quality assurance system or audit processas a strategy for addressing legal challengesto screening <strong>and</strong> monitoring procedures.Wisconsin’s litigation experience suggests <strong>the</strong>Mental Healthbine st<strong>and</strong>ardized screening with professionalwisdom of this approach. A reviewing courtexamination, at one or more levels, of eachmay find such efforts more credible if <strong>the</strong>yinmate considered for transfer to <strong>the</strong> ECU,involve persons from outside <strong>the</strong> correctionstoge<strong>the</strong>r with a final examination at admis-department.sion? The best approach has yet to be defined.■Mental health care. Provide ongoing diagno-■Monitoring. Implement a process for con-sis <strong>and</strong> treatment for mental health condi-stantly monitoring <strong>the</strong> mental status oftions. This is <strong>the</strong> “st<strong>and</strong>ard” level of serviceECU inmates <strong>and</strong> criteria for determiningexpected in any prison, <strong>and</strong> clearly a require-when transfer out of <strong>the</strong> unit is warranted.ment in <strong>the</strong> ECU.Wisconsin attempted to do this, but <strong>the</strong> courtcharacterized its efforts as “little more thanb<strong>and</strong>-aids to <strong>the</strong> potentially detrimental conditionsto which defendants are subjectingmentally ill inmates.” 47■Staffing. Maintain staffing levels in accordancewith <strong>the</strong> services to be provided.Operating an ECU mental health programshort-h<strong>and</strong>ed is an invitation to litigation <strong>and</strong>court intervention.■Removal. Implement a process for transferringinmates out of <strong>the</strong> ECU if <strong>the</strong>y meet <strong>the</strong>monitoring system’s criteria for removal. Thisrequires, among o<strong>the</strong>r things, a place to sendsuch inmates. Agencies should seek legaladvice on whe<strong>the</strong>r a Vitek hearing must■Medication. Be aware of legal constraintsconcerning involuntary medication, <strong>and</strong> haveprocedures in place for medicating inmateswhose serious mental illness presents a threatto <strong>the</strong>mselves <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs.accompany such transfer decisions.47Jones’El, 164 F. Supp. 2d at 1122.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!