106 MICROFINANCE INDIAin terms <strong>of</strong> land holding in joint name was very lowin spite <strong>of</strong> awareness among <strong>the</strong>se women about<strong>the</strong>ir rights. 70 per cent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> women studied werein <strong>the</strong> confines <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir homes; with <strong>the</strong> support <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong>ir spouses and micr<strong>of</strong>inance <strong>the</strong>y got an opportunityto earn and contribute to <strong>the</strong>ir family. Theirincomes, however meagre, have given <strong>the</strong>m confidenceand made <strong>the</strong>m feel worthwhile, though withincreased physical burden. This new found economicindependence does give <strong>the</strong>m a lot <strong>of</strong> hope. We needhowever to distinguish economic independence fromempowerment. To <strong>the</strong>se women, Micr<strong>of</strong>inance seemsa transformation to economic independence. ForMicr<strong>of</strong>inance to effectively contribute to women’s empowerment,or facilitate it at some level, <strong>the</strong> womeninvolved must perceive <strong>the</strong>mselves as being providedchoices, which <strong>the</strong>y never had in <strong>the</strong> past. Unless anduntil this mindset is present, we are not likely to findempirically that micr<strong>of</strong>inance leads to women’s empowerment.Women’s empowerment seems a nonissueto <strong>the</strong>m, hence an illusion, at least as <strong>of</strong> now.The point to ponder is whe<strong>the</strong>r micr<strong>of</strong>inancehas an ideological position on gender empowermentin <strong>the</strong> midst <strong>of</strong> doing business. Some parts<strong>of</strong> micr<strong>of</strong>inance seem exploitative <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> nature <strong>of</strong>women, especially with regard to recoveries. Financing<strong>of</strong> single women and unmarried girls isconsidered a risk, even when migration <strong>of</strong> adultmales is more common. The question that needsan answer is what kind <strong>of</strong> product and processchanges need to take place to make micr<strong>of</strong>inancemore gender sensitive?Is it <strong>the</strong> responsibility <strong>of</strong>MFIs alone?The initiatives on SPM are targeted at MFIs approaching<strong>the</strong>ir customers from a responsible andwelfare viewpoint even as <strong>the</strong>y strive to achieve<strong>the</strong>ir business goals. MFIs are expected to have a sociallyrelevant mission, introduce customer friendlyproducts, appropriate processes, invest in customereducation, exercise restraint in pricing and <strong>of</strong>ferservices beyond finance to improve livelihoods andquality <strong>of</strong> life. MFIs are but a part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sector thatseeks to reach out to vulnerable customers. Thefunders, donors and government have an equallyimportant role to play if MFIs are to deliver whatis expected <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m. A review <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> operations <strong>of</strong>MFIs on <strong>the</strong> ground makes it clear that smaller MFIsand Community Owned Micr<strong>of</strong>inance Institutions(COMFI) deliver more social content and are responsibleto <strong>the</strong>ir customers. Higher level agencieswith an objective <strong>of</strong> maximizing social performancewould do well to support <strong>the</strong>se institutions that arealready well engaged in appropriate practices. Butsmall institutions and COMFIs face extraordinarydifficulties in accessing mainstream funds. Theyare increasingly forced to change form to becomeNBFCs. It is amply evident that an entity becomingNBFC loses its original DNA. Regardless <strong>of</strong> howeverhard NBFCs try, investor control and shareholdervalue considerations would limit <strong>the</strong>ir social performancefocus. The contrarian signals that emanatefrom banks and socially minded investors that pushsocially committed MFIs first to choose forms thatare not natural social entities and <strong>the</strong>n to demand<strong>of</strong> such institutions that <strong>the</strong>y perform socially aredifficult to comprehend. Enabling environmentfor smaller institutions and COMFIs to get accessto bulk funds, equity and capacity building supportwill bolster SPM in micr<strong>of</strong>inance as much as allo<strong>the</strong>r ongoing effort addressed at commercial MFIs.In not providing a good environment to smallerMFIs and those in non-pr<strong>of</strong>it forms, <strong>the</strong> funders donot practice what <strong>the</strong>y preach. In respect <strong>of</strong> price<strong>of</strong> loans, training <strong>of</strong> staff on SPM, improved loanproducts and practices, funders should also lead <strong>the</strong>way. Good practices emerge from good examples.Funders and donors should introduce changes in<strong>the</strong> manner <strong>the</strong>y deal with <strong>the</strong> MFIs and <strong>the</strong>n demand<strong>of</strong> MFIs that <strong>the</strong>y behave similarly towards<strong>the</strong>ir customers.In sum, <strong>the</strong> bottom <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> pyramid customers arenot only vulnerable but also lack <strong>the</strong> skills and resourcesto negotiate markets. Despite all attempts atliteracy and education, <strong>the</strong>y will find it hard to acquire<strong>the</strong> kind <strong>of</strong> competence required to contractloans and savings with financial institutions thatcome with highly advanced skills. It is incumbenton <strong>the</strong>se pr<strong>of</strong>essional institutions to deliver <strong>the</strong> best<strong>of</strong> services on conditions favourable to <strong>the</strong> customerwithout being asked ei<strong>the</strong>r by <strong>the</strong> customer or by<strong>the</strong> external institutions. Responsible finance hasmeaning only when <strong>the</strong>se acts that are in <strong>the</strong> customers’interest are performed voluntarily withoutbeing asked. If this has to be externally stipulated,enforced and monitored on a long term, <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong>meaning <strong>of</strong> responsible finance is lost especiallywhen <strong>the</strong> institutional mandate stipulates that <strong>the</strong>ydeal exclusively with vulnerable people for <strong>the</strong>irbetterment.Notes1. Micr<strong>of</strong>inance Institutions Network is an industryassociation <strong>of</strong> NBFCs in Micr<strong>of</strong>inance, set up lastyear, currently having 39 members.2. Sadhan is a network <strong>of</strong> MFIs, MFOs and o<strong>the</strong>r institutionsworking in micr<strong>of</strong>inance sector. It had 230members —financial and non-financial entities.
Social performance, transparency and responsible finance 1073. Alok Prasad, CEO MFIN.4. ‘Access to Finance in Andhra Pradesh’, CMF-IFMRfor CMR-BIRD funded by NABARD.5. ‘Access to finance in Andhra Pradesh, <strong>2010</strong>’, CMF-IFMR for CMR-BIRD funded by NABARD.6. Micr<strong>of</strong>inance Transparency is a non-pr<strong>of</strong>it companyregistered in <strong>the</strong> USA, with a mandate to promotetransparency in pricing across <strong>the</strong> world. It has alreadypublished transparent prices for four countriesand is actively working with 20 more countries(including India) for publishing transparent pricesin public domain.7. ‘Micr<strong>of</strong>inance Synergies and Trade-<strong>of</strong>fs: Social versusFinancial Performance Outcomes in 2008’, AdrianGonzalez, MIX Data Brief no 7.8. Popular MIS s<strong>of</strong>tware from <strong>the</strong> Grameen stable.9. Social Performance Task Force (SPTF) is an internationalcoalition <strong>of</strong> institutions engaged in promotingand facilitating <strong>of</strong> social performance content inmicr<strong>of</strong>inance programmes across <strong>the</strong> world.10. ‘Micr<strong>of</strong>inance Synergies and Trade-<strong>of</strong>fs: Social versusFinancial Performance Outcomes in 2008’, AdrianGonzalez, MIX Data Brief no 7.11. Joshua Wan, intern in CMF-IFMR guided by JustinOliver, Shreyas Gopinath and <strong>the</strong> author <strong>of</strong> thisreport carried out <strong>the</strong> survey <strong>of</strong> respondents andprovided <strong>the</strong> data on social and financial orientationscores, providing <strong>the</strong> basis for <strong>the</strong> fur<strong>the</strong>r analysiscontained in <strong>the</strong> report.12. The assumptions were that high return-on-assetsand high yields are not socially aligned as <strong>the</strong>ycause distress to <strong>the</strong> customer. Though financialsector return-on-assets hovers around 1 per cent,looking to <strong>the</strong> peculiarities <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Micr<strong>of</strong>inancesector return-on-assets <strong>of</strong> 4 per cent was deemed<strong>the</strong> threshold for an institution to be consideredas socially aligned. Return-on-assets in excess <strong>of</strong> 4,<strong>the</strong>refore, was not considered ‘social’ for this scoring.Similarly, yield in excess <strong>of</strong> 30 per cent wasnot deemed ‘social’. Disclosure <strong>of</strong> interest rates toborrowers was deemed social. If MFIs had decliningyields when <strong>the</strong>ir costs declined, <strong>the</strong> action wasdeemed social. Where yields increased despite a decreasein operating costs or where cost savings werenot reflected in declining yields, <strong>the</strong> same was notdeemed ‘social’.13. ‘The Illusion <strong>of</strong> Women Empowerment in Micr<strong>of</strong>inance:A case study’, Lakshmi Kumar, Faculty,IFMR.
- Page 1:
Microfinance India
- Page 4 and 5:
Copyright ©ACCESS Development Serv
- Page 7 and 8:
List of Tables, Figures, Boxes,Abbr
- Page 9 and 10:
List of Tables, Figures, Boxes, Abb
- Page 11 and 12:
List of Tables, Figures, Boxes, Abb
- Page 13 and 14:
ForewordAfter coping with the uncer
- Page 15:
ForewordxvI’m happy that the 2010
- Page 18 and 19:
xviiiMICROFINANCE INDIASadhan’s c
- Page 20 and 21:
2 MICROFINANCE INDIARBI is focused
- Page 22 and 23:
4 MICROFINANCE INDIAcent in 2009. 1
- Page 24 and 25:
6 MICROFINANCE INDIAMFIs did not se
- Page 26:
8 MICROFINANCE INDIA(DFID) had prio
- Page 29:
Overview—the juggernaut decelerat
- Page 32 and 33:
14 MICROFINANCE INDIASavings Perfor
- Page 34 and 35:
16 MICROFINANCE INDIAamply clear th
- Page 36 and 37:
18 MICROFINANCE INDIAyears have a l
- Page 38 and 39:
20 MICROFINANCE INDIAThe study whil
- Page 40 and 41:
22 MICROFINANCE INDIAper cent peopl
- Page 42 and 43:
24 MICROFINANCE INDIAState andname
- Page 44 and 45:
26 MICROFINANCE INDIAinnovation tha
- Page 46 and 47:
28 MICROFINANCE INDIAANNEX 2.2Micro
- Page 48 and 49:
30 MICROFINANCE INDIARegion/StateF
- Page 50 and 51:
32 MICROFINANCE INDIAMFIs in the mi
- Page 52 and 53:
34 MICROFINANCE INDIAreturn-on-asse
- Page 54 and 55:
36 MICROFINANCE INDIAneeds introspe
- Page 56 and 57:
38 MICROFINANCE INDIACompetition an
- Page 58 and 59:
40 MICROFINANCE INDIAIt looks unfai
- Page 60 and 61:
42 MICROFINANCE INDIAwas a commenda
- Page 62 and 63:
44 MICROFINANCE INDIAterms of ideas
- Page 64 and 65:
46 MICROFINANCE INDIAfast growth of
- Page 66 and 67:
48 MICROFINANCE INDIASecond wave of
- Page 68 and 69:
50 MICROFINANCE INDIABut to make MF
- Page 70 and 71:
52 MICROFINANCE INDIA11. In Chapter
- Page 72 and 73:
54 MICROFINANCE INDIAflow of funds
- Page 74 and 75: 56 MICROFINANCE INDIAThe MHP requir
- Page 76 and 77: 58 MICROFINANCE INDIAto boomerang o
- Page 78 and 79: 60 MICROFINANCE INDIAlocal populati
- Page 80 and 81: 62 MICROFINANCE INDIAInvestor Inves
- Page 82 and 83: 64 MICROFINANCE INDIAand 3.1 in Eas
- Page 84 and 85: 66 MICROFINANCE INDIAto have the la
- Page 86 and 87: 68 MICROFINANCE INDIAand it also ha
- Page 89 and 90: Savings, investmentsand pensionMicr
- Page 91 and 92: Savings, investments and pension 73
- Page 93 and 94: Savings, investments and pension 75
- Page 95 and 96: Savings, investments and pension 77
- Page 97 and 98: Savings, investments and pension 79
- Page 99 and 100: On the other hand, a third of respo
- Page 101 and 102: Policy environmentand regulationThe
- Page 103 and 104: Policy environment and regulation 8
- Page 105 and 106: Policy environment and regulation 8
- Page 107 and 108: Technology in microfinanceMicrofina
- Page 109 and 110: Technology in microfinance 91Other
- Page 111 and 112: Technology in microfinance 93100%90
- Page 113 and 114: Social performance,transparency and
- Page 115 and 116: Social performance, transparency an
- Page 117 and 118: Social performance, transparency an
- Page 119 and 120: Social performance, transparency an
- Page 121 and 122: Table 9.2 Mission orientation and a
- Page 123: Social performance, transparency an
- Page 128 and 129: 110 MICROFINANCE INDIATable 10.1 Wh
- Page 130 and 131: 112 MICROFINANCE INDIAtransfer serv
- Page 132 and 133: 114 MICROFINANCE INDIAManaging BC n
- Page 134 and 135: 116 MICROFINANCE INDIAdoes not seem
- Page 136 and 137: 118 MICROFINANCE INDIASHG Sahayog N
- Page 138 and 139: 120 MICROFINANCE INDIATo conclude,
- Page 140 and 141: 122 MICROFINANCE INDIA6. Further, b
- Page 142 and 143: 124 MICROFINANCE INDIASl. No. Recom
- Page 144 and 145: 126 MICROFINANCE INDIA• To provid
- Page 146 and 147: 128 MICROFINANCE INDIAInstitutional
- Page 149 and 150: AppendixTable A.1 Fact sheet on cov
- Page 151 and 152: Appendix 133Name of the bankCommerc
- Page 153 and 154: Appendix 135mobilization by SHGs an
- Page 155 and 156: BibliographyThe Union Budget 2010-1
- Page 157: Bibliography 139‘How India Earns,