12.07.2015 Views

Microbial survival and heat generation during online sterilization of ...

Microbial survival and heat generation during online sterilization of ...

Microbial survival and heat generation during online sterilization of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

(a) Heat output rate(b) Volumetric <strong>heat</strong> outputFig. 7. Output <strong>heat</strong> per unit volume <strong>of</strong> flowing cheese whey in conventional <strong>and</strong>coil reactors.(a) Conventional reactor(b) Coil reactorFig. 8. Photographs showing fouling on UV lamps <strong>of</strong> photo-reactors.consumed in a photochemical reactiondecreased with increase in flow rate. Intheir study on <strong>heat</strong> <strong>generation</strong> <strong>and</strong> itsimpact on lamp fouling <strong>during</strong> cheesewhey <strong>sterilization</strong> using a conventionalUV reactor, Mahmoud <strong>and</strong> Ghaly (2004)found that the <strong>heat</strong> generated by a lowpressure mercury arc lamp decreasedwhile the effective radiation that isconsumed in the photochemical reactionincreased with decreasing flow.FoulingSuspended particles <strong>and</strong> high turbidity <strong>of</strong>the liquid medium have been found toreduce the penetration ability <strong>of</strong> the UVlight <strong>and</strong> thus reduce the efficiency <strong>of</strong> theUV conventional reactor (Mahmoud <strong>and</strong>Ghaly 2004). Similarly, microorganismscan aggregate or clump together, formingparticles that potentially protectmicroorganisms within aggregates thatwould otherwise be inactivated (USEPA1999). Visual observation <strong>of</strong> the UVlamps revealed less fouling in the coilreactor compared to conventional reactor(Fig. 8). As a result <strong>of</strong> secondary flow inthe coil reactor, the hydraulics <strong>of</strong> the flowdiffered from that in the conventionalreactor <strong>and</strong> resulted in less fouling.CONCLUSIONThe coil reactor was found to be moreefficient than the conventional reactor asit resulted in higher microbial destructionin shorter retention time. The destructionefficiency <strong>of</strong> the conventional reactordecreased from 99.4% (at 5 mL/min) to31.58% (at 70 mL/min), whereas thedestruction efficiency in the coil reactorincreased from 60.77% (at 5 mL/min) to99.98% (at 30 mL/min) <strong>and</strong> thendecreased with further increases in flowrate reaching 46.2% (at 70 mL/min). Therate <strong>of</strong> microbial destruction was found tobe exponential in the conventional reactor<strong>and</strong> polynomial in the coil reactor. Theflow was laminar in both reactors (Re =1.4 - 20.1). Dean flow was observed inthe coil reactor (De = 1.09 - 15.41) <strong>and</strong>Dean vortices resulted in higherdestruction efficiencies <strong>and</strong> increased<strong>heat</strong> transfer as compared to theconventional reactor. The maximumeffluent temperatures in the conventionalreactor <strong>and</strong> coil reactor were 45.8 <strong>and</strong>46.1EC, respectively. The <strong>heat</strong> <strong>generation</strong><strong>and</strong> thus effective radiation that wasconsumed in the photochemical reactionin the conventional <strong>and</strong> coil reactors was3.10LE GÉNIE DES BIOSYSTÈMES AU CANADA SINGH <strong>and</strong> GHALY

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!