12.07.2015 Views

1 Lévy Processes and Infinite Divisibility - Department of ...

1 Lévy Processes and Infinite Divisibility - Department of ...

1 Lévy Processes and Infinite Divisibility - Department of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The term “<strong>Lévy</strong> process” honours the work <strong>of</strong> the French mathematicianPaul <strong>Lévy</strong> who, although not alone in his contribution, played an instrumentalroleinbringingtogetheranunderst<strong>and</strong>ing<strong>and</strong>characterisation<strong>of</strong>processeswithstationary independent increments. In earlier literature, <strong>Lévy</strong> processes can befound under a number <strong>of</strong> different names. In the 1940s, <strong>Lévy</strong> himself referred tothem as a sub-class <strong>of</strong> processus additifs (additive processes), that is processeswith independent increments. For the most part however, research literaturethrough the 1960s <strong>and</strong> 1970s refers to <strong>Lévy</strong> processes simply as processes withstationary independent increments. One sees a change in language through the1980s<strong>and</strong>bythe1990stheuse<strong>of</strong>the term“<strong>Lévy</strong>process”hadbecomest<strong>and</strong>ard.From Definition 1.1 alone it is difficult to see just how rich a class <strong>of</strong> processesthe class <strong>of</strong> <strong>Lévy</strong> processes forms. De Finetti [4] introduced the notion<strong>of</strong> an infinitely divisible distribution <strong>and</strong> showed that they have an intimaterelationship with <strong>Lévy</strong> processes. This relationship gives a reasonably good impression<strong>of</strong> how varied the class <strong>of</strong> <strong>Lévy</strong> processes really is. To this end, let usnow devote a little time to discussing infinitely divisible distributions.Definition 1.2 We say that a real-valued r<strong>and</strong>om variable Θ has an infinitelydivisible distribution if for each n = 1,2,... there exist a sequence <strong>of</strong> i.i.d. r<strong>and</strong>omvariables Θ 1,n ,...,Θ n,n such thatΘ d = Θ 1,n +···+Θ n,nwhere = d is equality in distribution. Alternatively, we could have expressed thisrelation in terms <strong>of</strong> probability laws. That is to say, the law µ <strong>of</strong> a real-valuedr<strong>and</strong>om variable is infinitely divisible if for each n = 1,2,... there exists anotherlaw µ n <strong>of</strong> a real valued r<strong>and</strong>om variable such that µ = µ ∗nn . (Here µ ∗ n denotesthe n-fold convolution <strong>of</strong> µ n ).In view <strong>of</strong> the above definition, one way to establish whether a given r<strong>and</strong>omvariable has an infinitely divisible distribution is via its characteristic exponent.Suppose that Θ has characteristic exponent Ψ(u) := −logE(e iuΘ ) for all u ∈ R.Then Θ has an infinitely divisible distribution if for all n ≥ 1 there exists acharacteristic exponent <strong>of</strong> a probability distribution, say Ψ n , such that Ψ(u) =nΨ n (u) for all u ∈ R.The full extent to which we may characteriseinfinitely divisible distributionsis described by the characteristic exponent Ψ <strong>and</strong> an expression known as the<strong>Lévy</strong>–Khintchine formula. 2Theorem 1.1 (<strong>Lévy</strong>–Khintchine formula) A probability law µ <strong>of</strong> a realvaluedr<strong>and</strong>om variable is infinitely divisible with characteristic exponent Ψ,∫e iθx µ(dx) = e −Ψ(θ) for θ ∈ R,R2 Note, although it is a trivial fact, it is always worth reminding oneself <strong>of</strong> that one worksin general with the Fourier transform <strong>of</strong> a measure as opposed to the Laplace transform onaccount <strong>of</strong> the fact that the latter may not exist.3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!