STATES OF EMERGENCY - Patrick Lagadec

More documents

Recommendations

Info

182 Technological crises and the actors involvedshould note that we often neglect the presence of PCBs themselves. Here, theanalyses performed a week later proved that there were large amounts.Certain writers have stated that the Villeurbanne experience should teachus to be less hasty in the future. That may well be true as far as thecontamination of the water table is concerned, but it's easy to say so after thefact. There are a lot less volunteers for Russian roulette than for the statelottery.P.L.: What do these two cases have in common?L. ABENHAIM: I chose these two examples because they illustrate the kindsof choices facing public health practitioners more and more today. We haveto make decisions in environments full of uncertainty. Worse yet, theproblems are posed in scientific terms (e.g. risks, toxic effects), but science isin fact unable to provide formal answers.There are more than 60,000 commercially available chemical compounds,and 1000 more hit the market each year. We have knowledge of the acuteeffects of some of them, but we only have epidemiological data on the longtermeffects of a few dozen, less than a hundred of them. It takes years tostudy a compound sufficiently and to understand its chronic effects on humanbeings.Animal experiments have been done and have revealed teratogenic orcarcinogenic effects, under conditions that are incomparable, in terms ofeither dosage or exposure, to the conditions encountered by human beings. Atthose levels, you almost always find some effect in animals. On the otherhand, some substances are carcinogenic for humans but not for animals.Should we wait for proof that a substance is dangerous for humans, orrather, in the absence of proof that it is innocuous, should we assume there isa hazard?For the public, we understandably have to take the fewest risks possible,but the dilemma lies in the fact that these decisions themselves are not neutralor risk-free. To cite the examples I've given, banning work on VDTs for allwomen of childbearing age would undoubtedly lead to unemploymentproblems, with non-negligeable consequences that can also affect health. Ifnothing else, declaring that working on computer terminals was dangerouswould lead to job-site discrimination, in an age when computers are evermore commonplace. In the same way, thousands of people cannot beevacuated without a certain amount of stress, and without re-entry problems.What's more, recent incidents in France have shown that large-scaleevacuations are very difficult to carry out.Often, populations are exposed to a hazard through an accident, or duringthe introduction of a new technological procedure. Under thesecircumstances, that means there is practically no scientific knowledge aboutthe conditions created by exposure. In other words, the expert's evaluation isbased on judgment and on an interpretation of the data, which necessarilyleaves a wide margin of uncertainty. The expert is called on to make noneother than an educated guess based on the information available.
L. Abenhaim: Crisis and public health decision 183Making a public health decision is something neither technical nor trulyscientific. It's more like the obstetrician who must choose between a caesarianand a breech birth without knowing exactly which is the better solution. Thisis where operating know-how, an epidemiological sixth sense, and aknowledge of the distribution of morbid phenomena in a given population canall play a crucial role.
Page 1 and 2:
STATES OF EMERGENCYTechnological Fa
Page 3 and 4:
viiiContents- Edgar Fasel..........
Page 5 and 6:
IntroductionIn recent years, a whol
Page 7 and 8:
Introduction 3And what goes for maj
Page 9 and 10:
Introduction 5It is not hard to mea
Page 11 and 12:
Introduction 7Look for example at t
Page 13 and 14:
PART ONETechnical Breakdown,Crisis
Page 15 and 16:
12 Technical breakdown, crisis and
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 38 and 39:
Organizations with their backs to t
Page 40 and 41:
Page 42 and 43:
Page 44 and 45:
3. In the thick of thingsThe most r
Page 46 and 47:
MARC BECAMThe oil spill from the
Page 48 and 49:
M. Becam: The "Amoco Cadiz" 47Trava
Page 50 and 51:
M. Becam: The "Amoco Cadiz" 49quest
Page 52 and 53:
M. Becam: The "Amoco Cadiz" 51M. BE
Page 54 and 55:
M. Becam: The "Amoco Cadiz" 53way:
Page 56 and 57:
RICHARD THORNBURGHThree Mile Island
Page 58 and 59:
R. Thornburgh: Three Mile Island 57
Page 60 and 61:
Page 62 and 63:
Page 64 and 65:
Page 66 and 67:
Page 68 and 69:
D.K Burrows: Mississauga 67We chose
Page 70 and 71:
D .K Burrows: Mississauga 69look af
Page 72 and 73:
D.K Burrows: Mississauga 71D.K. BUR
Page 74 and 75:
D.K Burrows: Mississauga 73P.L.: No
Page 76 and 77:
76 Technological crises and the act
Page 78 and 79:
Page 80 and 81:
Page 82 and 83:
Page 84 and 85:
EDGAR FASELSchweizerhalleand the po
Page 86 and 87:
Page 88 and 89:
Page 90 and 91:
PHILIPPE VESSERONThe case of the Se
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
Page 98 and 99:
Page 100 and 101:
100 Technological crises and the ac
Page 102 and 103:
Page 104 and 105:
Page 106 and 107:
Page 108 and 109:
Page 110 and 111:
Technological crises and the actors
Page 112 and 113:
Technological crises and the actors
Page 114 and 115:
Page 116 and 117:
Page 118 and 119:
Page 120 and 121:
Page 122 and 123:
Page 124 and 125:
Page 126 and 127:
Page 128 and 129:
Page 130 and 131:
Page 132 and 133: 132 Technological crises and the ac
Page 172 and 173: LUCIEN ABENHAIMUncertainty, the exp
Page 184 and 185: PIERRE BOBE AND JACQUES FOURNIERIn
Page 190 and 191: ROBERT L. DILENSCHNEIDEREthics and
Page 196 and 197: FRANÇOIS AILLERETAn attitude of op
Page 208 and 209: LAURENT FABIUSOur societies: ill-pr
Page 214 and 215: 214Technological crises and the act
Page 222 and 223: ENRICO QUARANTELLIThirty years of c
Page 232 and 233:
PART THREELandmarks for ActionQuest
Page 234 and 235:
236 Landmarks for action. Questions
Page 236 and 237:
Page 238 and 239:
Page 240 and 241:
Page 242 and 243:
Page 244 and 245:
Page 246 and 247:
Page 248 and 249:
Page 250 and 251:
6. Perspectives: the debate is open
Page 252 and 253:
Perspectives: the debate is open 25
Page 254 and 255:
Page 256 and 257:
Page 258 and 259:
Page 260 and 261:
Page 262 and 263:
Page 264 and 265:
Page 266 and 267:
Page 268 and 269:
Page 270 and 271:
Page 272 and 273:
276 Conclusionsituations of excepti
Page 274 and 275:
ReferencesIntroduction1. P. Lagadec
Page 276 and 277:
References 281Chapter 21. Newsweek,
Page 278:
References 28314. Interview with Lu
show all

STATES OF EMERGENCY - Patrick Lagadec

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?