Myron Hess, National Wildlife Federation

More documents

Recommendations

Info

CONSERVATION v. EFFICIENCY• DEFINITION OF WATER CONSERVATION IN TEXASWATER CODE INCLUDES REUSE• THAT DEFINITION ALSO RECOGNIZES THATEFFICIENCY IS A SEPARATE CONCEPT FROMREUSE• INCREASED REUSE DOESN’T AUTOMATICALLYMEAN INCREASED WATER USE EFFICIENCY
REUSE ≠ EFFICIENCY• City A• 1,000 people• 150,000 gpd diverted• 150 gallons per person• 60% return factor• 60,000 gpd net flow lossCity B1,000 people150,000 gpd diverted150 gallons per person60% return factor60,000 gpd net flow loss
Page 1 and 2: Myron HessManager, Texas Water Prog
Page 3 and 4: WASTERWATER REUSE: + OR - FORTHE EN
Page 5 and 6: REUSE CONTEXT IN DALLAS-FT. WORTH R
Page 12 and 13: USUALLY PORTION OFWATER DIVERTED IS
Page 14 and 15: USUALLY PORTION OFWATER DIVERTED IS
Page 16 and 17: HOLES IN REGULATORY APPROACH• DEF
Page 18 and 19: PHARMACEUTICAL RETURN FLOW CYCLE
Page 20: WITH THE RIGHT REGULATORY APPROACH,

Myron Hess, National Wildlife Federation

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?