Myron Hess, National Wildlife Federation

More documents

Recommendations

Info

USUALLY PORTION OFWATER DIVERTED ISRETURNED TO THE STREAM90,000 gpd150,000 gpdNet loss for stream of 60,000 gpdTEST CASE of attempt to whiteout underlying text box throughuse og a rough approach to see if itwill work
• City AREUSE ≠ EFFICIENCYCity B• 1,000 (1,200) people 1,000 (1,200) people• 150,000 gpd diverted 150,000 gpd diverted• 150 gallons per person 150 gallons per person• 60% return factor 60% return factor• 60,000 gpd net flow loss 60,000 gpd net flow loss• Efficiency (30,000 gpd) Reuse (30,000 gpd)• 150,000 diverted 150,000 diverted + 30,000• 1,200 people = 125 gal/person 1,200 people = 150 gal/person• 60,000 gpd net flow loss 72,000 gpd net flow loss
Page 1 and 2: Myron HessManager, Texas Water Prog
Page 3 and 4: WASTERWATER REUSE: + OR - FORTHE EN
Page 5 and 6: REUSE CONTEXT IN DALLAS-FT. WORTH R
Page 10 and 11: CONSERVATION v. EFFICIENCY• DEFIN
Page 14 and 15: USUALLY PORTION OFWATER DIVERTED IS
Page 16 and 17: HOLES IN REGULATORY APPROACH• DEF
Page 18 and 19: PHARMACEUTICAL RETURN FLOW CYCLE
Page 20: WITH THE RIGHT REGULATORY APPROACH,

Myron Hess, National Wildlife Federation

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?