12.07.2015 Views

Dowel design - cticm

Dowel design - cticm

Dowel design - cticm

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Precobeam - Composite dowelsDesign guideRiccardo ZANONOliver HECHLERwww.arcelormittal.com/sectionsSections.tecom@arcelormittal.com19/10/2012 Confidential 0October 2012


Field of application<strong>Dowel</strong> in upper flange<strong>Dowel</strong> in lower flange• Simple or double Precobeam• Steel grades:S235 - S460• Concrete grades: C20/25 – C60/7515/10/2012 Recent developments 3


Typical Precobeam element(1) Steel flange: Absorbs stresses from bendingmoments and provides cross-section stiffness.(2) Steel web: Transmission of longitudinal shear forces,ensures steel flange – concrete web distance whereneeded (e.g. to avoid concrete cracking).(3) Composite dowel: Transmit longitudinal shear forcesbetween concrete and steel.(4) Prefabricated concrete web: <strong>design</strong>ed uponstructural demands and is reinforced with the externalsections.(5) Prefabricated concrete plate: 10-12cm thickconcrete-plate which serves as formwork and scaffoldingfor the in-situ concrete and is <strong>design</strong>ed for loads fromconstructions stages.(6) In situ concrete plate: It completes the prefabricatedconcrete-plate and is <strong>design</strong>ed upon structural needs forthe crucial load combinations in the final stages.(7) In situ Longitudinal reinforcement: It is assembledwithin the in-situ concrete-slab for the final constructionstage.(8) Precast Longitudinal reinforcement: <strong>design</strong>ed uponstructural needs for loads from construction stage(s).(9) Transversal shear reinforcement: <strong>design</strong>ed uponstructural needs from transversal shear under specialconsideration of dowel action.(10) Confinement reinforcement: <strong>design</strong>ed uponapproaches from local dowel action. It is essential toensure a ductile load bearing behaviour.15/10/2012 Recent developments 4


Steel dowel geometry+ =• On the basis of the past experience, which showed a better fatigue behaviour and easy fabrication process,it is advised to use the modified clothoidal shape (MCL) for the <strong>design</strong> of road and railway bridges.15/10/2012 Recent developments 5


Steel dowel geometry EN• The principle is that the basic shape can be scaled in function of e x .• The dowel axis distance e x is the considered as the basis dimension:150 mm ≤ e x ≤ 500mm, usually e x = 250mm, h D = 115mm, h D / e x = 0.4615/10/2012 Recent developments 6


Steel dowel geometry EN• The principle is that the basic shape can be scaled in function of e x .• The dowel axis distance e x is the considered as the basis dimension:150 mm ≤ e x ≤ 500mm, usually e x = 250mm, h D = 115mm, h D / e x = 0.4615/10/2012 Recent developments 7


Field of application• Longitudinal cross-section:• Transversal cross-section:15/10/2012 Recent developments 9


Field of application• Definition of characteristics of the dowel:1) Steel dowel2) <strong>Dowel</strong> root3) <strong>Dowel</strong> top4) <strong>Dowel</strong> base5) Concrete dowel6) <strong>Dowel</strong> core7) <strong>Dowel</strong> reinforcement8) Upper reinforcement15/10/2012 Recent developments 10


Table of content• Content– Introduction to structural concept– <strong>Dowel</strong> <strong>design</strong> – Ultimate limit state– <strong>Dowel</strong> <strong>design</strong> – Serviceability limit state– <strong>Dowel</strong> <strong>design</strong> – Fatigue limit state– Conclusion15/10/2012 Recent developments 11


Load Bearing Behavior– Static loading• Standard Push-out tests for headed-studs (EN1994-1-1, Annex B):15/10/2012 Recent developments 12


Load Bearing Behavior– Static loading• Standard Push-out tests for composite dowels:15/10/2012 Recent developments 13


Load Bearing Behavior– Static loading• Standard Push-out tests for composite dowels:700600<strong>Dowel</strong> force [kN]5004003002001000Slip [ mm]SA-A-1PZ-A-2CL-A-30 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40Slilp [mm]15/10/2012 Recent developments 14


Experimental background15/10/2012 Recent developments 15


27 Beam tests• Slabs• Beams• Pos./Neg. Moment• Beam distance15/10/2012 Recent developments 16


65 Push-out / Pull-out tests• <strong>Dowel</strong> geometry• Web thickness• Reinforcing type• <strong>Dowel</strong> distance• <strong>Dowel</strong> height15/10/2012 Recent developments 17


Load Bearing Behavior– Static loading• Contribution of the different load bearing mechanisms:15/10/2012 Recent developments 18


<strong>Dowel</strong> <strong>design</strong> – Static loadingVerification of longitudinal shear transmission:Static loadingConcrete failureSteel failureFailure criteria:Concrete shearing Pry-Out Spalling concrete coverage Steel failure15/10/2012 Recent developments 19


Concrete shear failure15/10/2012 Recent developments 20


<strong>Dowel</strong> <strong>design</strong> – Concrete shear failureConcrete dowel failure on shear:Design equation:A DWith:15/10/2012 Recent developments 21


Concrete pry-out15/10/2012 Recent developments 22


<strong>Dowel</strong> <strong>design</strong> – Concrete pry-outPry-out of concrete cone:Design equation:With:15/10/2012 Recent developments 23


<strong>Dowel</strong> <strong>design</strong> – Concrete pry-outReduction factor for overlapping of concrete cones:15/10/2012 Recent developments 24


Spalling of concrete coverage15/10/2012 Recent developments 25


<strong>Dowel</strong> <strong>design</strong> – Spalling concrete coverageSpalling of concrete coverage:Design equation:Pcov, k1=ex⋅4⋅lhcr2⋅e2x0,3⋅f0,15+h ⋅bpo3ckc2⎛⎜ 1−⎝hD2⋅hpo⎞⎟⎠15/10/2012 Recent developments 26


<strong>Dowel</strong> <strong>design</strong> – Confinement reinforcementFor girders it is recommended to provide confinement reinforcement:Design equation for sufficient confinement reinforcement:If sufficient confinement reinforcement is provided, pry-out of concrete cone andspalling of concrete coverage are prevented and may be disregarded.15/10/2012 Recent developments 27


<strong>Dowel</strong> <strong>design</strong> – Concrete pry-out for girdersMinimal confinement reinforcement:In general for girders, confinement reinforcement should be foreseen.15/10/2012 Recent developments 28


<strong>Dowel</strong> <strong>design</strong> – Steel failure15/10/2012 Recent developments 29


<strong>Dowel</strong> <strong>design</strong> – Steel failureSteel failure – interaction of local bending and longitudinal shear inthe critical section:Design equation:15/10/2012 Recent developments 30


Table of content• Content– Introduction to structural concept– <strong>Dowel</strong> <strong>design</strong> – Ultimate limit state– <strong>Dowel</strong> <strong>design</strong> – Serviceability limit state– <strong>Dowel</strong> <strong>design</strong> – Fatigue limit state– Conclusion15/10/2012 Recent developments 31


<strong>Dowel</strong> <strong>design</strong> – Cyclic loadingVerification of longitudinal shear transmission:Cyclic loadingSteelstressesFailure criteria:Steel failureShearconnectionCyclic pry-outConcretestressesConcrete loosening15/10/2012 Recent developments 32


<strong>Dowel</strong> <strong>design</strong> – Stress verificationStress pattern in the composite dowel:• Local Forces• σ x• Surface of increased stresses :o Consideration of stress concentration factors forboth local dowel action andglobal bending• σ x• σ x • σ x• Influence from local dowel-action• Influence from global bending15/10/2012 Recent developments 33


<strong>Dowel</strong> <strong>design</strong> – Stress verification34Stress concentration for local and global action:Local dowel-actionGlobal bendingHot-spot steel stress:σ s=fLV⋅tLw⋅S⋅ Iyy+fG⎛⋅ ⎜⎝MIyy⋅ z+NA⎞⎟⎠15/10/2012 Recent developments 34


<strong>Dowel</strong> <strong>design</strong> – Stress verificationSafe sided assumption:f local.max = 7,3f global.max = 1,515/10/2012 Recent developments 35


Concrete loosening under cyclic loading15/10/2012 Recent developments 36


<strong>Dowel</strong> <strong>design</strong> – Concrete looseningAvoiding of concrete loosening under cyclic loading to avoid the softening of theshear connection:Stiff shear connectionPartial shear connectionCyclic load which may cause concrete loosening:15/10/2012 Recent developments 37


<strong>Dowel</strong> <strong>design</strong> SLS – verifications:Characteristic combination - Limitation of steel stresses:σsV x Sy⎛ N M ⎞= kf Lk ⎜f Gz ⎟,⋅ +,⋅ + ⋅D≤ 1. 3⋅Iy× twA I⎝ y ⎠f global = 1,5 f Local = 7,95fyCharacteristic combination – Limitation of force in the concrete dowel:( P ; P P )PLD, ser≤ 0.7 minsh.k po.k;co.kCharacteristic combination – Limitation of force in the concrete dowel:PLD,ser≤Pcyc15/10/2012 Recent developments 38


Table of content• Content– Introduction to structural concept– <strong>Dowel</strong> <strong>design</strong> – Ultimate limit state– <strong>Dowel</strong> <strong>design</strong> – Serviceability limit state– <strong>Dowel</strong> <strong>design</strong> – Fatigue limit state– Conclusion15/10/2012 Recent developments 39


Steel failure by fatigue15/10/2012 Recent developments 41


<strong>Dowel</strong> <strong>design</strong> – Fatigue verificationStress concentration for local and global action:Test• Geometrical KerfDesign according the structural stress concept – EN1993-1-9:∆Vx Sy∆ σ = kf , L⋅ + kf , GIy× tw⎛⎜∆N⋅⎝ A+∆MIy⋅ zD⎞⎟ ≤⎠∆σSγMf-f local = 6,45-f global = 1,5−∆σ s= 125 for machine gas-cut edges with shallow or regular drag-lines−∆σ s= 140 for machine gas cut or sheared material with grinded edges− In general re-entrant corners have to be improved by grinding (slope < 1 / 4)15/10/2012 Recent developments 42


Table of content• Content– Introduction to structural concept– <strong>Dowel</strong> <strong>design</strong> – Ultimate limit state– <strong>Dowel</strong> <strong>design</strong> – Serviceability limit state– <strong>Dowel</strong> <strong>design</strong> – Fatigue limit state– Conclusion15/10/2012 Recent developments 43


Conclusion15/10/2012 Recent developments 44


Conclusion15/10/2012 Recent developments Vigaun bridge (2008, ÖBB, 45 AT)


Conclusion?15/10/2012 Recent developments Vigaun bridge (2008, ÖBB, 46 AT)


ConclusionVigaun bridge1m dowel10 … 30 shear connectors15/10/2012 Recent developments Vigaun bridge (2008, ÖBB, 47 AT)


AcknowledgementsPreco+: Partners: Support:15/10/2012 Recent developments 48


Many thanks for your kind attention!4915/10/2012 Recent developments 49

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!