12.07.2015 Views

2007 Wetland Inventory for the Eyre Peninsula

2007 Wetland Inventory for the Eyre Peninsula

2007 Wetland Inventory for the Eyre Peninsula

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

22.2 Aquatic floraThis records <strong>the</strong> abundance and diversity of aquatic vegetation. Low (1) indicates no or very little aquaticvegetation, moderate (3) indicates some aquatic vegetation cover ei<strong>the</strong>r in <strong>the</strong> <strong>for</strong>m of floating or rootedvegetation, high (5) indicates good diversity of aquatic vegetation with a range of rooted vegetation such asreeds and rushes and floating vegetation such as water ribbons.Eleven sites received a low score, 16 sites a moderate score and no sites received high scores.23.0 RIPARIAN VEGETATION RAPID ASSESSMENTRiparian native vegetation is assessed in three zones. These are <strong>the</strong> toe of bank (low water – high water),bank (high water mark – buffer) and buffer (top of <strong>the</strong> bank to <strong>the</strong> buffer which can extend between 10metres and 100 metres). The vegetation association <strong>for</strong> each zone consists of <strong>the</strong> dominant or co-dominantover storey species and understorey species. The vegetation association <strong>for</strong> each zone is scoredconsidering <strong>the</strong> level of disturbance and vegetation cover within each zone.The vegetation association scoring system consists of: Degraded or no vegetation (1) with less than 30% vegetation cover, with high level of disturbance, Natural (3) between 30 – 75% vegetation cover, with little disturbance Intact (5) over 75% vegetation cover with little or no disturbance.Table 3. Riparian vegetation Rapid Assessment.Degraded Natural IntactToe of bank 10 10 7Bank 11 8 8Buffer 13 11 524.0 WETLAND CONDITION SCOREThe wetland score reflects <strong>the</strong> previous rapid assessment scores <strong>for</strong> aquatic fauna, aquatic vegetation andriparian vegetation values. The combination of <strong>the</strong>se values and <strong>the</strong> interpretation of o<strong>the</strong>rs parametersrecorded during <strong>the</strong> survey (such as land degradation and water chemistry) <strong>for</strong>m <strong>the</strong> basis of <strong>the</strong> wetlandcondition score.The wetland score consists of: Degraded (1) those sites that have a high level of disturbance and received low rapid assessmentscores. Natural (3) those sites that have little disturbance, received moderate to high rapid assessmentscores and that are sites usually protected within <strong>the</strong> reserve system or by privateconservation. Pristine (5) those sites with no obvious sign of disturbance, scored very highly in <strong>the</strong> rapid assessmentand are <strong>for</strong>mally conserved within <strong>the</strong> State reserve system.<strong>Wetland</strong> condition scores are very subjective. Although 17 sites received a natural score, significantdisturbances are present at most sites. Nine sites scored as degraded and no sites received apristine score.42

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!