02.12.2012 Views

CO-NH2 CO-NH2 „„CO-NH2 CO-NH2

CO-NH2 CO-NH2 „„CO-NH2 CO-NH2

CO-NH2 CO-NH2 „„CO-NH2 CO-NH2

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

12 METHADONE, MORPHINE, PETHIDINE AND <strong>CO</strong>DEINE<br />

TABLE III—"ANALGESIC" POTENCY RATIOS OF METHADONE, MORPHINE, PETHIDINE AND<br />

<strong>CO</strong>DEINE AS DETERMINED BY S.C. INJECTION IN MICE AND RATS<br />

IN FORTY-SIX DIFFERENT EXPERIMENTAL <strong>CO</strong>NDITIONS<br />

Methadone : morphine<br />

Morphine : pethidine<br />

Pethidine : codeine<br />

Methadone : pethidine<br />

Methadone : codeine<br />

Morphine : codeine<br />

Average<br />

1-8<br />

3-4<br />

1-7<br />

5-8<br />

70<br />

3-7<br />

* n = number of comparative results.<br />

Mice s.c.<br />

Minimum<br />

1-1<br />

1-0<br />

10<br />

1-8<br />

2-7<br />

1-3<br />

Maximum<br />

3-8<br />

5-7<br />

2-1<br />

100<br />

130<br />

6-8<br />

The data listed in Tables II and III show:<br />

17<br />

14<br />

5<br />

12<br />

8<br />

8<br />

Average<br />

1-9<br />

4-5<br />

21<br />

7-8<br />

16 7-6<br />

Rats s.c.<br />

Minimum<br />

1-2<br />

2-4<br />

11<br />

4-5<br />

7-2<br />

5-6<br />

Maximum<br />

2-8<br />

81<br />

3-5<br />

11-0<br />

280<br />

9-9<br />

(a) That the results obtained in mice and in rats are quite similar.<br />

(b) That the variations of the results obtained in methods characterized<br />

by similar noxious stimuli, are as large as the variation of the combined<br />

results.<br />

(c) That there is no detectable correlation between "equiactive" dose<br />

level and potency ratio.<br />

(d) That the potency ratios and "equiactive" dose levels determined<br />

after i.p. injection are not significantly different from those obtained after<br />

s.c. injection.<br />

(e) That the results obtained after oral or i.v. administration are quite<br />

different from the s.c. and i.p. results. The agreement among different<br />

authors is very poor.<br />

(f) That too few experiments with other species have been carried out to<br />

allow for useful discussion.<br />

(g) That factors, other than those listed in Table II, must play an important<br />

role in determining the outcome of the experiments.<br />

10<br />

6<br />

3<br />

5<br />

4<br />

4

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!