12.07.2015 Views

future harv/est - Search CIMMYT repository

future harv/est - Search CIMMYT repository

future harv/est - Search CIMMYT repository

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

536 K. Adhikari, K.B. Koirala alld M. SubediTable 5. Per capita consumption offood grains, g/day, 1971-1996.Year Maize Rice Wheat Population(million)1971/72 140.0 467.0 47.7 11.51981/82 137.2 467.0 73.0 15.01991/92 175.7 468.5 111.1 18.71995/96 174.5 469.0 132.9 20.8The area, production and productivity has marginally improved over the last twenty-five years inTerai, whereas in mid and high hills area under maize has increased by 200% but productivity hasdeclined by 17%. This might have resulted due to:• Research efforts in the past concentrated mainly on accessible areas of Terai whichoccupies only 20% of the total maize area.• Decline of soil fertility in rainfed marginal hill land which occupies 80% area andunavailability of production inputs poses a serious threat for higher sustainable production.• In hills, maize production is a part of complex system with extreme environmentalvariability and hence needs a system-based approach which has been neglected in the past.• Maize yield, therefore, is far below the expectation. There is a wide gap between potentialyield of open-pollinated varieties (OPVs) having 5.0 t/ha (on-station experimental yields),attainable yield of about 3.5 tlha (on-farm yield with improved practices) and actual yieldof 1.7 t/ha (national average 1995/96) (Fig 1). Hence, it is important that new researchfocuses in alternative technological approaches to break this yield barrier.6Yield tlha5432oOn-StationOn-FarmFarmers FieldProduction environmentFigure 1Yield gap in maize

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!