12.07.2015 Views

future harv/est - Search CIMMYT repository

future harv/est - Search CIMMYT repository

future harv/est - Search CIMMYT repository

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

542 K Adhikari, K.B. Koirala alld M. SubediStalk rot complex: In a fanner's field in Chitwan about 80% grain yield loss was <strong>est</strong>imated dueto stalk rot complex (Batsa and Neupane, 1982).Development of disease resistant varietiesGermplasm screening against major diseases of maize has been an integral part of maizeresearch and developoment program in Nepal. In the past, most of the screenings were based on fieldt<strong>est</strong> under natural disease pressure. These days attempts have also been made through artificialinoculation.Downy mildew: The importance of downy mildew disease was well recognized in the past.However, work on development of downy mildew resistant varieties started only from 197 I byintroducing downy mildew resistant germplasm Thai Compo x Suwan-l from Thailand and throughlACP trials (Lal, 1983). Due to its excellent performance both in research stations and farmers field itwas recommended in 1975 by the name Rampur Composite.Similarly, Philippines DMR-2 (College white x Tuxpeno) was also found high yielding andresistant to downy mildew in lACP trials-2 after extensive t<strong>est</strong>ing at research stations and farms. Itwas recommended in the same year (1975) by the name of Sarlahi Seto to meet the long felt need ofwhite maize growing areas of Terai and inner Terai (Lal, 1983) and eastern mid and lower hills.Northern leaf blight: Most of the maize genotypes so far t<strong>est</strong>ed were observed susceptible tomoderately susceptible to the disease. However, some genotypes such as BA 932126, Pool 9A andArun-l have been found moderately resistant. At present, efforts have been made to improveManakamana-l for resistance to northern leaf blight (Table 9).Table 9.Improvement cycle of Manakamana-1 maize variety for resistant to H. lurcicum,1989-1996.YearMaterialTotal no. of families t<strong>est</strong>edNo. of selected families1989/90WinterManakamana-l variety(1500 plants were selfed)1990/91Manakamana-l families250481991192312841992/9336151993/9481251994/951995/961996/97Selected families were bulkedMaintenance and seed increaseof bulked materials.Comparative study of resistanceversion of Manakamana-l withother varieties for agronomictraits

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!