40 <strong>Piero</strong> <strong>Sraffa</strong>Actually, there was one particularly important weak point in the analyticrepresentation Ricardo offered of the classical conception of theeconomy, and that was the hypothesis of relative prices proportionalto the quantity of labour required for the production of the variouscommodities, which is inconsistent with the assumption of a uniformrate of profits in the various industries. For a coherent representationof the capitalist economy the problem had to be solved. <strong>Sraffa</strong>’s effortswere already moving in this direction when he began work on theRicardo edition, and the two lines of research were pursued in paralleland alternately for decades. Finally, in 1960, <strong>Sraffa</strong> published his littlejewel, Production of Commodities by Means of Commodities.The next chapters are devoted to this work: a general presentationof it (Chapter 3), and a more detailed analysis of two aspects, thedistinction between basic and non-basic commodities (Chapter 4)and the construction of a unit of measure, the standard commodity(Chapter 5).3Production of Commoditiesby Means of Commodities3.1 From Ricardo to <strong>Sraffa</strong>This chapter is devoted to <strong>Sraffa</strong>’s major contribution: a relativelyslender volume – 92 pages of text, including the Preface – work onwhich began in 1927, when the author moved to Cambridge, and wasfinally published in 1960 in English, with the Italian edition followinga few weeks later. 1 As we shall see, in Production of Commodities by Meansof Commodities <strong>Sraffa</strong> comes up with a solution to the problem of valueframed in terms of the classical conception, simultaneously determiningrelative prices and one of the two distributive variables, the wagerate and the rate of profits, with the other distributive variable consideredas exogenously given.There is a close link between the critical edition of Ricardo’s Works andCorrespondence and the theoretical research <strong>Sraffa</strong> himself was engagedin. In the 1930s and 1940s his work proceeded along two parallel paths,with greater intensity on the Ricardo edition in the 1930s and withrenewed focus on the book in the early 1940s; 2 in the second half of1The Italian edition was prepared, as mentioned before, under the impulse andwith the decisive help of <strong>Sraffa</strong>’s life-long friend, the banker Raffaele Mattioli.The publisher, Giulio Einaudi, was also a friend of <strong>Sraffa</strong>’s and son of his professor,Luigi Einaudi; for years <strong>Sraffa</strong> was a highly respected adviser to his publisher,who played an important role in the shaping of Italy’s left-wing culture.2A multi-volume edition of the <strong>Sraffa</strong> Papers has been announced as forthcomingsince about a decade ago, under the general editorship of Heinz Kurz, withCambridge University Press. For a general presentation of the <strong>Sraffa</strong> Papers cf.Kurz (1998), Smith (1998, 2000); the catalogue prepared by Jonathan Smith isavailable on the Internet at http://www.lib.trin.cam.ac.uk. In the meantime,availability of the <strong>Sraffa</strong> papers held in Trinity College, Cambridge, stimulated, atan increasing rate over the past decade, researches on the original development(Continued)41
42 <strong>Piero</strong> <strong>Sraffa</strong>the 1950s, as the work on Ricardo came to completion (apart from theindexes, which at the time <strong>Sraffa</strong> hoped would be drawn up by somebodyelse), <strong>Sraffa</strong> concentrated on preparing his more strictly analyticcontribution for publication. 3A crucial point in the development of <strong>Sraffa</strong>’s thinking consists – as hehimself points out in the Preface to his 1960 book, and as we shall seemore clearly in Chapter 7 – in the transition from the idea that analysisof competition requires the assumption of constant returns to scale tothe idea that no hypotheses on returns need be involved. The need forsuch hypotheses was disturbing for <strong>Sraffa</strong> not only on account of theanalytic difficulties which they entailed, discussed in his 1925 and 1926papers and directly concerning the Marshallian partial equilibriumapproach, but also for a more general, methodological, reason, namelyhis aversion to relying on ‘any idealistic argument that obscured […]objective reference’ and his reliance on ‘physical’ data. 4 The transitiontook place somewhere between 1927 and 1930 (probably closer to thelatter part of the period), constituting the culmination of <strong>Sraffa</strong>’s efforts,beginning with the 1925 article, to supersede the Marshallian approach.In this period <strong>Sraffa</strong> also realised that physical costs alone are insufficientfor determining exchange values, and that income distributionbetween wages and profits is also relevant.(Continued)of <strong>Sraffa</strong>’s ideas in the second half of the 1920s (Garegnani 2004, Rosselli 2004),on the role of Marxian influences (De Vivo 2004, Gilibert 2004), on the developmentsin the 1930s and 1940s (De Vivo 2000, 2001, Rosselli 2001 focusedon the work on the Ricardo edition, Pasinetti 2001, Gilibert 2004), on <strong>Sraffa</strong>’sbiography (Bellofiore and Potier 1998, Naldi 1998, Potier 2000, Daniele 2000,D’Orsi 2001, Naldi 2001 and 2004, Marcuzzo 2001 and 2004) and on specificissues, such as money and banking (Panico 1998 and 2001, Bellofiore 2001) or<strong>Sraffa</strong>’s interaction with his mathematical friends while working on his 1960book (Kurz and Salvadori 2001, 2004, 2008). We should recall, however, thatthis literature, though interesting and useful in itself, can only have an indirectbearing on the interpretation of <strong>Sraffa</strong>’s thought, which – as <strong>Sraffa</strong> himself alwaysinsisted – must be firmly grounded on his published writings. In other words, inthe hierarchy of sources, published material must always take precedence overunpublished material (and this, of course, must take precedence over the oraltradition).3In the early 1950s <strong>Sraffa</strong>’s work was delayed by ‘a terrible mountaineering accidentin a sadly famous holyday in Norway’ (Pasinetti 2007: 178).4Kurz (1998: 24–5) quotes the passage above from <strong>Sraffa</strong> Papers D3/12/9.46,where <strong>Sraffa</strong> takes a few notes from a paper on ‘Goethe’s view of nature’, andrecalls <strong>Sraffa</strong>’s preference for the ‘physician’s outlook of Petty’ (<strong>Sraffa</strong> PapersD3/12/4.3). On this cf. also Naldi (2004: 100). On Petty and <strong>Sraffa</strong>, cf. Roncaglia(1977).Production of Commodities by Means of Commodities 43After this brief introduction, the rest of this chapter is devoted tosurvey of the content of <strong>Sraffa</strong>’s 1960 book (§ 3.2), illustration of its classical(mainly Ricardian) roots (§ 3.3), and discussion of certain aspectsof <strong>Sraffa</strong>’s conceptual framework. Thus we will look into the notionof socially necessary techniques (§ 3.4), the assumption of wages paidat the end of the period of production and the very notion of periodof production (§ 3.5). In conclusion we will take a general overview of<strong>Sraffa</strong>’s impact on economic culture, amounting to what may indeed beconsidered a Sraffian revolution, as slow in the making as in the deployingof its effects (§ 3.6).In <strong>Sraffa</strong>’s analysis, as in that of the classical economists and Marx, theanalytic condition upon which determination of the prices of production(the ‘natural’ prices of the classical economists) rests, consists quitesimply in an equal rate of profits in the various sectors. This assumptioncorresponds to the idea, pondered by Smith and Marx among others,that the unity of the capitalist system is guaranteed by the free flow ofcapital from one sector to another in pursuit of the most advantageousemployment. Nothing is stated on the relations between demand andsupply for each commodity; the hypothesis that equilibrium prices correspondto equality between demand and supply, characteristic of marginalisteconomic theory, finds no place in <strong>Sraffa</strong>’s treatment (a pointwe shall return to below, in § 3.3).3.2 Production of Commodities by Means of CommoditiesLet us now briefly survey the line of investigation followed in Productionof Commodities by Means of Commodities.When commodities are at the same time products and means ofproduction, the price of any one commodity cannot be determinedindependently of the others, nor the complex of relative prices independentlyof the distribution of income between profits and wages(which are expressed in terms of the commodity chosen as the unit ofmeasurement, and are thus real wages). One must therefore considerthe system as a whole, with all the interrelations running between thevarious productive sectors, tackling simultaneously income distributionand the determination of relative prices.As a first step, <strong>Sraffa</strong> (1960: 3) shows that in a system of productionfor mere subsistence, with no surplus product, and where ‘commoditiesare produced by separate industries and are exchanged for oneanother’ at the end of the production period, ‘there is a unique set ofexchange values which if adopted by the market restores the original
- Page 1 and 2: Piero SraffaAlessandro Roncaglia
- Page 3 and 4: ContentsList of FiguresIntroduction
- Page 5 and 6: Introduction ixWith this degree of
- Page 7 and 8: 2 Piero Sraffa(1874-1961), professo
- Page 9 and 10: 6 Piero Sraffarevaluation of the li
- Page 11 and 12: 10 Piero Sraffaadministration of th
- Page 13 and 14: 14 Piero Sraffa1.4 Imperfect compet
- Page 15: 18 Piero SraffaIn many fields of ec
- Page 18 and 19: 24 Piero SraffaAn Italian in Cambri
- Page 20 and 21: 28 Piero Sraffanot something fixed,
- Page 22 and 23: 32 Piero Sraffamonetary factors on
- Page 24 and 25: 36 Piero Sraffapartnered in his lab
- Page 28 and 29: 44 Piero Sraffadistribution of the
- Page 30 and 31: 48 Piero SraffaLet us recall at thi
- Page 32 and 33: 52 Piero Sraffathe other hand, the
- Page 34 and 35: 56 Piero Sraffaof production. 24 Bu
- Page 36 and 37: 4Basic and Non-Basic Products4.1 Ba
- Page 38 and 39: 64 Piero SraffaA line of argument s
- Page 40 and 41: 68 Piero Sraffathe system stemming
- Page 42 and 43: 72 Piero Sraffaplan that would yiel
- Page 44 and 45: 76 Piero Sraffaproduced less quanti
- Page 46 and 47: 80 Piero Sraffaterms of labour comm
- Page 48 and 49: 84 Piero Sraffaof value is, and mus
- Page 50 and 51: 88 Piero Sraffabeing invariant to c
- Page 52 and 53: 92 Piero Sraffa(variable plus const
- Page 54 and 55: 96 Piero Sraffaconsumption goods),
- Page 56 and 57: 100 Piero Sraffadirectly required f
- Page 58 and 59: 104 Piero Sraffaproduction’ (iden
- Page 60 and 61: 108 Piero SraffaCritique of the Mar
- Page 62 and 63: 112 Piero SraffaThe growing remoten
- Page 64 and 65: 116 Piero Sraffareturns: Sraffa’s
- Page 66 and 67: 120 Piero SraffaFurthermore, the cl
- Page 68 and 69: 124 Piero SraffaIn this way the pro
- Page 70 and 71: 128 Piero SraffaSraffa raised again
- Page 72 and 73: 132 Piero Sraffaconnected, but can
- Page 74 and 75: 136 Piero SraffaThe bridge between
- Page 76 and 77:
140 Piero SraffaSraffa’s work for
- Page 78 and 79:
144 Piero SraffaThis debate is stil
- Page 80 and 81:
148 Piero SraffaObviously the ‘Ma
- Page 82 and 83:
152 Piero SraffaIn comparison to th
- Page 84 and 85:
156 Piero Sraffaof the path actuall
- Page 86 and 87:
160 Piero SraffaHowever, this const
- Page 88 and 89:
164 ReferencesReferences 165——
- Page 90 and 91:
168 ReferencesReferences 169Levhari
- Page 92 and 93:
172 ReferencesReferences 173——
- Page 94 and 95:
176 ReferencesReferences 177——
- Page 96:
180 IndexIndex 181Marx K., 10, 29,