12.07.2015 Views

Investigation of the Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor

Investigation of the Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor

Investigation of the Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Audit and Control Director Frank Nastasi Offered Private Tax PreparationServices during <strong>Commission</strong> Working HoursEvery member <strong>of</strong> Audit and Control reported that Nastasi conducted a private taxbusiness. Some members testified to seeing tax clients enter and exit Nastasi’s<strong>Waterfront</strong> <strong>Commission</strong> <strong>of</strong>fice during <strong>the</strong> workday. The Inspector General was informedthat Nastasi submitted numerous boxes <strong>of</strong> his clients’ tax documents to be shredded. Anemployee determined that <strong>the</strong> boxes did not contain <strong>Waterfront</strong> <strong>Commission</strong> material.Nastasi admitted to operating a tax preparation business but denied conducting itduring his regular working hours at <strong>the</strong> <strong>Waterfront</strong> <strong>Commission</strong>. Nastasi didacknowledge that some private clients came to his <strong>Commission</strong> <strong>of</strong>fice “after hours”before his division moved to <strong>the</strong> new <strong>of</strong>fices located at 39 Broadway in early 2000. 23After <strong>the</strong> <strong>Waterfront</strong> <strong>Commission</strong> moved, Nastasi stated that his clients would only cometo <strong>the</strong> <strong>of</strong>fices to deliver documents. In response to <strong>the</strong> auditors’ assertions that he alwayskept his door closed, Nastasi stated that <strong>the</strong> <strong>of</strong>fice was very noisy.De Maria stated that he knew that Nastasi had a private tax business and heardthat a “couple <strong>of</strong> times” Nastasi’s clients came to <strong>the</strong> <strong>Waterfront</strong> <strong>Commission</strong>.According to De Maria, he instructed Nastasi to stop preparing taxes for his clientsduring <strong>Waterfront</strong> <strong>Commission</strong> hours. After that, De Maria stated that he learned <strong>of</strong> noadditional complaints alleging that Nastasi was operating a tax preparation businessduring <strong>Waterfront</strong> <strong>Commission</strong> hours. However, <strong>the</strong> testimony <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> auditors suggeststhat Nastasi continued to prepare tax documents during business hours. De Mariatestified that he did not know if Nastasi obtained permission to engage in outsideemployment as required by <strong>Commission</strong> policies because Nastasi pre-dated him and,<strong>the</strong>refore, he may have gotten permission prior to De Maria’s tenure. 24Nastasi Accessed Pornography on His <strong>Waterfront</strong> <strong>Commission</strong> ComputerDirector <strong>of</strong> Information Technology Lee Seeman testified that Nastasi accessedpornography and o<strong>the</strong>r inappropriate Web sites on his <strong>Waterfront</strong> <strong>Commission</strong> computerover a two-year period. Seeman testified that he informed <strong>the</strong>n-Executive Director DeMaria <strong>of</strong> Nastasi’s abuse <strong>of</strong> his <strong>Commission</strong> computer, but, when interviewed by <strong>the</strong>Inspector General, De Maria denied knowledge <strong>of</strong> it.Seeman stated from approximately 2006 through about eight months prior toNastasi’s retirement, Nastasi accessed or attempted to access pornographic material.According to Seeman, many <strong>of</strong> Nastasi’s attempts to access pornographic and lingerie23 The <strong>of</strong>fices <strong>of</strong> Audit and Control were located at 42 Broadway until early 2000.24 The <strong>Waterfront</strong> <strong>Commission</strong>’s Employee Manual, Section K, entitled “Outside Employment,” reads, inpart: “Employment with <strong>the</strong> <strong>Commission</strong> is full time and all personnel shall consider such employment as<strong>the</strong>ir sole occupation…. The <strong>Commission</strong> recognizes that an employee may find it necessary to engage inoutside employment on his or her own time. Before engaging in such employment, <strong>Commission</strong>employees shall state in writing <strong>the</strong> nature <strong>of</strong> employment giving details and shall obtain <strong>the</strong> approval <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> Executive Director…. No such additional work shall be permitted if, in <strong>the</strong> opinion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ExecutiveDirector, it will impair <strong>the</strong> ability <strong>of</strong> an employee to perform his or her <strong>Commission</strong> duties capably andefficiently.”31

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!