Budget - National Nuclear Security Administration

Annual Performance Results and Targets(R = Results; T = Targets)Performance IndicatorsFY 2006ResultsFY 2007ResultsFY 2008Results FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 Endpoint TargetR: 5.0%Secretarial Priority: Security: Reduce nuclear dangers and environmental risksGPRA Unit Program Number: 25, Office of the AdministratorFederal Administrative Costs: N/A N/A N/Aless than 6% (Efficiency) aMaintain the Office of theAdministrator Federaladministrative costs as apercentage of total WeaponsActivities and Defense NuclearNonproliferation program costs atT: 5.9%T: 5.9% T: 5.9% T: 5.9% T: 5.9% T: 5.9% T: 5.9% In keeping with OMB and DOEexpectations that administrativecosts be minimized, maintain theOffice of the Administrator Federaladministrative costs as a percentageof total Weapons Activities andDefense Nuclear Nonproliferationprogram costs at less than 6% . aPMCDP Certification:Cumulative percent of activeNNSA projects managed by aFederal Project Director, certifiedat the appropriate level through theProject Management CareerDevelopment Program (Long-termOutput) a N/A N/A N/A R: 76%T: 4%Annual average NNSA Programscore on the OMB ProgramAssessment Rating Tool (PART)assessment indicating progress inbudget performance integration andresults (Efficiency)R: 82%T: 80%R: 84.3%T: 85%R: 85%T: 85%T: 80% T: 85% T: 90% T: 95% T: 100% T: 100% By 2014, 100% of NNSA FederalProject Directors will be certified atthe appropriate level though theProject Management CareerDevelopment Program. aT: N/A b T: N/A T: N/A T: N/A T: N/A T: N/A T: N/A By 2007, increase annual averagePART scores to 85%.a New measure developed for FY 2009.b Prior to FY 2008, the cumulative average NNSA PART score was used as the indicator of the overall health of the organization. This metric was replaced with two newmetrics that better depict the overall health of the organization.Office of the Administrator/Program Direction Page 25FY 2011 Congressional Budget