Community-driven development decision tools for rural - IFAD

More documents

Recommendations

Info

25. Mansuri, G.; Vijayendra Rao. 2002. “Evaluating Community-Driven Development: A reviewof the evidence”. Draft paper.26. Nelson, R.; Gerrand, C.; Heath, J.; Kumar, N. “OED’s Seven Leading Rural Lessons”. WorldBank.27. Perret, G. 2002. ‘Community-Driven Development. Review of Financial Issues”. Internal IFADmemorandum.28. Perret, H. 2004. “Development Funds in IFAD Projects: Some Emerging Lessons”.29. Platteau, J.P.; Gaspart, F. 2003. “The Risk of Resource Misappropriation in Community-Driven Development”. World Development, v.31.30. Platteau, J.P. 2003. “Institutional and distributional aspects of sustainability of communitydrivendevelopment”.31. Pretty, J. 2003. “Social Capital and Connectiveness: Issues and Implications for Agriculture,Rural Development and Natural Resource Management in ACP Counties”. CTA WorkingDocument 8032.32. Ribot, J.C. 2002 “Democratic Decentralization of Natural Resources”, World ResourcesInstitute.33. Ribot, J.C. 2003. “Framework for Analysis of Community-Driven Development”.34. Romeo, L. 2002. “The road from decentralization to poverty reduction and the role ofexternal assistance”. United Nations Capital Development Fund.35. Strand, A; Toje, H.; Jerve, A.M.; Samset, I. 2003. “Community-Driven Development inContext of Conflict”. Concept Paper commissioned by World Bank to the ChristianMichelsen Institute.36. Summer,; Mejia Acosta, A.; Cabral, L.; Kapur, R.; Bahadur, A.; Bobde, S.; Hussein, K.;Brouillet, A.-S. 2009. “Access to Governance and Policy processes: what enables theparticipation of the poor”, background paper prepared for IFAD Rural Poverty Review.37. Tendler, J. “Why are Social Funds so popular?”38. Thirion, S. 2006. “Proposal for Indicators of CDD Approach and Global Governance”. IFADSecond Workshop on CDD. Accra.39. Van Vliet, G. 2005. « La Gouvernance Fracturée ». Dakar agricole.40. Van Vliet, G. 1998. “An Introduction to Carlos Mathur’s Strategic Situational Planning”.41. Williams, M.; J. Hangkok, J. and others. “Tables to analyse CDD typology, logframes, etc.”42. World Bank. 2002. “Fiduciary Management for Community-Driven Development Projects: aReference Guide.”43. World Bank. 2000. “Sourcebook on Community-Driven Development in the Africa Region:Community Action Programs”.44. World Bank. 2006. “The Effectiveness of World Bank Support for Community Development”.An OED EvaluationIFAD project documents45. « Dispositif de Suivi-Evaluation du FODESA ». 2000.46. Government of Cape Verde. 2000. “Programa Nacional de Luta contra a Pobreza no MedioRural, Manual de Procedimentos para a Primera Phase do Empréstimo FIDA”.47. Government of Ghana. Village Infrastructure Project. “Aide Memoire of 2001 Mid-termreview”.48. Government of Ghana. Village Infrastructure Project. “Report of the preparatory reviewmission”, 2001.97
49. Government of Ghana. Village Infrastructure Project. « Aide Memoire of 2002Implementation Support Mission ».50. Government of Ghana, Ministry of Agriculture. 2000. “Village Infrastructure ProjectImplementation Manual”, 2000.51. Government of Islamic Republic of Mauritania. 1994. “IFAD Appraisal Report of the OasesDevelopment Project Phase II”.52. Government of Islamic Republic of Mauritania. 2003. “Interim Evaluation of the OasesDevelopment Project Phase II”.53. Government of Mali. 1998. “Sahelian Area Development Fund Programme (FODESA):Appraisal Report”.54. Gouvernement du Mali. 2003. « Evaluation du premier cycle du FODESA ».55. Gouvernement du Sénégal. 2001. « POGV-2. Projet de Manuel de procédures ».56. Gouvernement du Sénégal. 2000. « Projet d’Organisation et de gestion villageoise (POGV) :Rapport d’achèvement de la première phase du projet ».57. IFAD. 2002. “The challenge of multi-donor partnerships: discussion note on the VillageInfrastructure Project”.58. IFAD. 2000. « Projet d’Organisation et de Gestion Villageoise Deuxième Phase (POGV-2) :Rapport de pré évaluation ».59. IFAD. 2003. « Rapport de supervision du FODESA ».60. IFAD. 2000. « Notes sur le dispositif de Suivi & Evaluation du FODESA ».61. IFAD; Government of Cape Verde. 1999. “Rural Poverty Alleviation Programme: AppraisalReport”.98
Page 1 and 2:
Community-driven developmentdecisio
Page 3 and 4:
The opinions expressed in this publ
Page 5 and 6:
PART B. CDD PROJECT DESIGN DECISION
Page 8:
ForewordThe CDD Decision Tools is t
Page 11 and 12:
What is CDD?A definition of communi
Page 13 and 14:
mechanisms on a list of priority ne
Page 15 and 16:
Figure 1Example of decision tree on
Page 17 and 18:
ICDD’s emphasis on communitiesand
Page 19 and 20:
The answer to the second question i
Page 21 and 22:
IICDD and local governanceDefinitio
Page 23 and 24:
communities and local governance in
Page 25 and 26:
IIIPoverty focus of CDDIFAD’s spe
Page 27 and 28:
The way that partnership is negotia
Page 29 and 30:
Risk of elite captureNon-exclusion
Page 31 and 32:
Elite capture by local, professiona
Page 33 and 34:
Box 17Lessons learned about targeti
Page 35:
Poverty and poor resilience against
Page 38 and 39:
espect. For the political setting t
Page 40 and 41:
IFAD’s CDD projects do not need g
Page 42 and 43:
domain of a community or a small cl
Page 44 and 45:
Government procedures andprocesses
Page 46 and 47:
Part B.CDD project design decisions
Page 48 and 49: To link community development and t
Page 50 and 51: CDD and production and marketing in
Page 52 and 53: Table 2Degrees of CDD in rural fina
Page 54 and 55: Partnership issues in CDD projectsV
Page 56 and 57: eduction when there is government d
Page 58 and 59: The government ideally should inclu
Page 60 and 61: the CBOs (i.e. VDCs and different t
Page 62 and 63: territory that may include several
Page 64 and 65: Implementation arrangementsfor CDD
Page 68 and 69: • conformance with conditions imp
Page 70 and 71: A larger CDD content is achieved by
Page 72 and 73: Sustainable arrangements tofinance
Page 74 and 75: contribution to building a sustaina
Page 76 and 77: Financing projects through CSOs of
Page 78 and 79: Managing CDD projectsXIMost common
Page 80 and 81: Managing expectations about paceDur
Page 82 and 83: management. In many cases, the meth
Page 84: political or project management int
Page 87 and 88: A note on fiscal decentralization1.
Page 89 and 90: to use the money in the way it deci
Page 92 and 93: Appendix 291
Page 94 and 95: targeting around 30 per cent of the
Page 96 and 97: In both Mali and Guinea, the interv
Page 101 and 102: CONTACTSMohamed ManssouriCountry Pr
show all

Community-driven development decision tools for rural - IFAD

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?