13.07.2015 Views

The Dispensational View of the Davidic Kingdom - The Master's ...

The Dispensational View of the Davidic Kingdom - The Master's ...

The Dispensational View of the Davidic Kingdom - The Master's ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

226 <strong>The</strong> <strong>Master's</strong> Seminary Journalcovenanted kingdom. <strong>The</strong> allegation that Christ is seated on <strong>the</strong>fa<strong>the</strong>r's throne reigning over a spiritual kingdom, <strong>the</strong> church, simplydoes not fulfill <strong>the</strong> promises <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> covenant." 51 In a more recent work,he also speaks <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>of</strong>fer, rejection, and postponement <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>kingdom:In His covenant with David (2 Sam. 7:16), God promised that adescendant <strong>of</strong> David would sit on David's throne and rule over hishouse. This covenanted program was <strong>of</strong>fered to Israel, but wasrejected by <strong>the</strong> nation. Because <strong>the</strong> covenants are eternal, unconditional,and <strong>the</strong>refore irrevocable, <strong>the</strong> <strong>Davidic</strong> kingdom programwould not be canceled. It could, however, be postponed. 52He adds, "Christ's central teaching was that <strong>the</strong> <strong>Davidic</strong> kingdomwould be postponed until a future time." 53 He also discusses <strong>the</strong>church, and though he refers to it as a "new form <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> kingdom," heexplicitly holds to <strong>the</strong> withdrawal and postponement <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Davidic</strong>kingdom. 54After referring to <strong>the</strong> views <strong>of</strong> Walvoord, Ryrie, and Pentecost,Blaising claims, "In response to <strong>the</strong> criticisms <strong>of</strong> George Ladd, <strong>the</strong>ydropped <strong>the</strong> kingdom distinctions <strong>of</strong> Sc<strong>of</strong>ield, modified his essentialstructure in different ways and introduced <strong>the</strong>ir own terminology. Asa result, <strong>the</strong>re is no revised dispensational kingdom <strong>the</strong>ology butcompeting interpretations which have had various levels <strong>of</strong>influence." 55 He ignores, however, <strong>the</strong> agreement among <strong>the</strong>mconcerning <strong>the</strong> postponement <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Davidic</strong> kingdom, as documentedabove, and obscures <strong>the</strong>ir agreement with each o<strong>the</strong>r and with <strong>the</strong>irpredecessors.51J. Dwight Pentecost, Things To Come (Findlay, Ohio: Dunham, 1958) 114.52J. Dwight Pentecost, Thy <strong>Kingdom</strong> Come (Wheaton, Ill.: Victor, 1990) 233.53Ibid., 234.54Ibid., 234-35.55Craig Blaising, "Contemporary <strong>Dispensational</strong>ism," Southwestern Journal <strong>of</strong><strong>The</strong>ology 36 (Spring 1994):9.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!