The Dispensational View of the Davidic Kingdom - The Master's ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

216 The Master's Seminary Journalthe view that the church in its present form is unrelated to and distinctfrom the Davidic kingdom.This essay argues that the rejection, postponement, and entirelyfuture fulfillment of the Davidic kingdom is and has been aconsistently held view within "normative" dispensationalism. 7 Itfurther argues that this position serves as a distinguishing feature ofdispensationalism, differentiating it from non-dispensational theology.The progressives reject this position and consequently at least blur thedistinction between dispensational and non-dispensational views. 8The first section of this essay will examine the rejected/postponedDavidic kingdom view throughout the history of dispensationalism,beginning with the work of John Nelson Darby. This section will alsoexamine how non-dispensationalists note this concept withindispensationalism. The second section will assess the currentlandscape, giving attention to the rejected/postponed Davidickingdom view in PD. Next will follow a look at the ramifications ofthe current discussion for normative dispensationalism. However, inorder to interact with the claims of Blaising concerning whether thedispensational tradition of the kingdom has changed, a discussion ofthe meanings of "development" and "change" is in order.Kingdom Distinctions in Normative DispensationalismCharles C. Ryrie has argued for the need to distinguish betweenthe concepts of development and change, and this is especially true interms of examining the history of doctrines and doctrinal systems. Hesums up his discussion by noting, " (1) development and change arenot synonymous but have different meanings; and (2) in order todecide whether something is developing or changing one must7The term "normative" follows Larry Crutchfield, The Origins of Dispensationalism:The Darby Factor (Lanham, Md.: University Press of America, 1992) 23-42. It includesthe entire dispensational tradition (classic and revised), excluding the progressives.8Cf. "The essence of dispensationalism, then, is the distinction between Israel andthe Church," Charles C. Ryrie, Dispensationalism Today (Chicago: Moody, 1965) 47; cf.idem, Dispensationalism (Chicago: Moody, 1995) 41.
Dispensational View of the Davidic Kingdom 217consider what the essentials of the matter are." 9 The issue of thekingdom serves as a fitting example. Admittedly, a difference exists inviews of the substantive distinction between the phrases kingdom ofGod and kingdom of heaven within the dispensational tradition. 10Clarence Mason in his helpful words on this issue poses thequestion: "The kingdom of heaven and the kingdom of God: distinctor equated?" 11 He reflects his respect for both C. I. Scofield and L. S.Chafer, prefacing his critique of their view that the phrases themselvesrepresent a substantive distinction. 12 He then writes, "However, . . . Icame to the conclusion that this distinction . . . is not a validdistinction," and he proceeds to argue that the terms are usedsynonymously in Daniel and the Gospels. 13 However, in regard toroot distinctions between the phrases and the concepts underlyingthem, Mason adds, "It seems to me that the simpler and better solutionis to recognize that the terms are synonymous and that the variation isdue to context, not the variant word." 14 He then proposes the"Multiple uses of the idea (or word `kingdom') in the Bible." 15 Ryrieconcurs in reasoning that Scripture speaks of various concepts of the9Charles C. Ryrie, "Update On Dispensationalism," in Issues In Dispensationalism 16;cf. idem, Dispensationalism 161-81.10For the teaching of the distinction by earlier dispensationalists, see J. N. Darby,Collected Writings (Sunbury, Pa.: Believers Bookshelf, reprint, 1971) 25:47; C. I.Scofield, Scofield Reference Bible (Oxford: University Press, 1917) note on Matt 6:33; L.S. Chafer, Systematic Theology (Dallas: Seminary Press, 1948) 7:223-25.11Clarence Mason, Prophetic Problems with Alternate Solutions (Chicago: Moody,1973) 101.12Mason acknowledges his early dependence on the Scofield Reference Bible. Healso served on the revision committee for the New Scofield Reference Bible, (1967). Hefurther points out how he was a member of the first class at Dallas TheologicalSeminary (then named the Evangelical Theological College), sitting under theteaching of Chafer (ibid., 102).13Ibid., 102-3, 103-7.14Ibid., 105.15Ibid., 107.
Page 1 and 2: TMSJ 7/2 (Fall 1996) 213-239THE DIS
Page 3: Dispensational View of the Davidic
Page 7 and 8: Dispensational View of the Davidic

The Dispensational View of the Davidic Kingdom - The Master's ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?