Opening powerpoint presentation by H.G. Brauch, 21 November 2005

More documents

Recommendations

Info

10.7. Structure of the Seminar (1)Monday, 20 February 20069.00-10.30: Was the contextual change of 1989 or 2001 instrumental for aconceptual change of security?R-1: Brauch: IntroductionR-2: Pignot: Global international contextual changes: a) Yalta and Potsdam summits (1945), and b) Fall of Berlin wall (1989)10.45-12.15: Conceptual quartet of peace, security, devel-op-ment andenvironment since 1990R-3: Hildebrandt: Classical relationship: security and peace linkages in the UN charter (1945 and 2005 compared). InternationallawR-4: Schulz: The new relationship: Security and environment at the 6th IHDP Open meeting13.00-14.30: Three traditions of Hobbes, Grotius and Kant (M. Wight): ASecurity Council debate on war in IraqR-5: Steffen: The Hobbesian tradition: The realist ( neo(realist), structural realist, and neocon) schools where only power mattersR-6: NN: The Grotian tradition: The pragmatic school where cooperation mattersR-7: Apinyan: The Kantian tradition: The legal school where ideas matterWhat security means for policy makers: Role of mindsets (K. Booth) and/or operational codes (A. George)14.45-16.15: Widening and deepening of security during the 1990s: TheCopenhagen school on “securitisation”R-8: Gloye: Widening: the five dimensions: political, military, economic, societal, environmentalR-9: NN: Deepening: the five levels of analysis (human, societal, national, regional, global) and different referents (Møller)16.30-18.00: Referents of securitisation: State security vs. human securityR-10: Vuorimäki: The “State” as the key referent: concepts of global and international security of statesR-11: Kujawa: Humankind and the individual as the key referent: concepts of human security
10.8. Structure of the Seminar (2)Tuesday, 21 February 20069.00-10.30: Spatial context and referents of security concepts: national vs. societalsecurity: a disputeR-12: Le Jeune: Concepts of national securityR-13: Düro: Concepts of societal security10.45-12.15: Sectorialisation of security in internat. organisat. UNDP, IEA, FAO, UNUF-14: Hierl: Responding to the Oil Shocks of the 1970s: International Energy Agency and energy securityR-15: Pemtschew: From human development to human security: concept development in UNDP: Human Devel.Reports13.00-14.30: Environmental security as a theoretical construct: four phases of theconceptual debatesR-16: Bader: The Theoretical Approach of the Toronto school: Homer-Dixon on environmental conflictR-17: Ward: The Theoretical Approach of the Swiss school: Baechler on environmental conflict and cooperation14.45-16.15: Climate change and desertification as security threats, challenges,vulnerabilities and risksR-18: Schossig: Abrupt vs. gradual climate change as a security Threat? BMU Study vs. Pentagon studyR-19: Morrisson: Desertification as a security challenge: The NATO workshops in Valencia (2003): NATO ARW,UNCCD16.30-18.00: Environmental Security ConceptsR-20: German –American NATO CCMS Study on Environmental Security (1996-1999)R-21: Mierzejewska: ENVSEC initiative of OSCE, UNDP, UNEP and NATO on the Caucasus and Central Asia
Page 1 and 2:
15424 HS: SectorialisingSecurity in
Page 4 and 5:
Definition of security: concept, va
Page 6 and 7:
1.1. Defining Security:Science vs.
Page 9 and 10:
1.4. Security Perception:Worldviews
Page 11 and 12:
1.6. Robert Kagan*): Mars vs. Venus
Page 13 and 14:
1.8. Questions for any Security Con
Page 15 and 16:
1.10. New Linkages: 11th EADIInsecu
Page 17 and 18:
2.1. Global Contextual Change &Scie
Page 19 and 20:
2.3.Fall of the Berlin Wall:Change
Page 21 and 22:
2.5. New York 11 September 2001,Mad
Page 23 and 24:
2.7. Two causes forreconceptualisat
Page 25 and 26:
3. Widening, Deepeningand Sectorial
Page 27 and 28:
3.2. Focus: Sectorialising of Secur
Page 29 and 30:
3.4. Four Security Dangers: Threats
Page 31 and 32:
3.6. Ideal type worldviews on secur
Page 33 and 34:
4.1. Global Environmental Change(GE
Page 35 and 36:
4.3. Model: Global Environmental Ch
Page 37 and 38:
4.5. The Pressure (Cause), Effect,
Page 39 and 40: 4.7. International Policy Activitie
Page 41 and 42: 5.1. The Causes of GEC as Objects o
Page 43 and 44: 5.3. Climate Change and ConflictsHo
Page 45 and 46: 5.5. Desertification as a Cause and
Page 47 and 48: 5.7. Impact (Hazard & Disaster) & S
Page 49 and 50: 5.9. Scientific Goal: Enhancing Kno
Page 51 and 52: 5.11. Extreme Weather Events in 21
Page 53 and 54: 5.12.Diagnosis: Coexistence of Outc
Page 55 and 56: 5.14. Bangladesh: Disaster & Confli
Page 57 and 58: 6.1. Competing Schools andConcepts
Page 59 and 60: 6.3. Three Groups ofHuman Security
Page 61 and 62: 6.5. Human Security Network Members
Page 63 and 64: 6.7. Security vs. Survival dilemma?
Page 65 and 66: 7.1. Several Political Reassessment
Page 67 and 68: 8. Reconceptualising Security at UN
Page 69 and 70: 8.2. SG‘s High-level Panel on Thr
Page 71 and 72: 8.4. SG‘s High-level Panel on Thr
Page 73 and 74: 9.1. European Commission Barroso Go
Page 75 and 76: 9.3. Commission of the European Com
Page 77 and 78: 9.5. EU Commission: Communication:A
Page 79 and 80: 9.7. The European security strategy
Page 81 and 82: 9.9. Barroso: Guiding principles an
Page 83 and 84: 10. Reconceptualising Security:Goal
Page 85 and 86: 10.2. Montreal, Sopron, The Hague,2
Page 87 and 88: 10.4. Hexagon Series on Human andEn
Page 89: 10.6. Conclusions:Research & Policy
show all

Opening powerpoint presentation by H.G. Brauch, 21 November 2005

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?