13.07.2015 Views

Minimizing Losses in Hay Storage and Feeding - MSUcares

Minimizing Losses in Hay Storage and Feeding - MSUcares

Minimizing Losses in Hay Storage and Feeding - MSUcares

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

MINIMIZING LOSSES IN HAYSTORAGE AND FEEDINGEach year more than 60 million acresof forage crops are harvested for hay <strong>in</strong>the United States. Annual productionfrom this acreage is over 150 milliontons of hay valued at more than 12billion dollars. <strong>Hay</strong> is the most widelygrown mechanically-harvested agronomiccrop <strong>in</strong> the United States.As a source of nutrition for livestock,hay offers numerous advantages.It can be made from many differentcrops; when protected from theweather it can be stored <strong>in</strong>def<strong>in</strong>itelywith little nutrient loss; package sizes<strong>and</strong> shapes can vary greatly; <strong>and</strong>harvest<strong>in</strong>g, storage, <strong>and</strong> feed<strong>in</strong>g canvary from be<strong>in</strong>g done by h<strong>and</strong> to be<strong>in</strong>gcompletely mechanized. <strong>Hay</strong> often canmeet, or almost meet, the nutrientneeds of many classes of livestock.Because of its many merits, hay isthe most commonly used stored feedon livestock farms across the nation.Unfortunately, losses of hay dur<strong>in</strong>gstorage <strong>and</strong> feed<strong>in</strong>g are often high,particularly with round bales storedoutside <strong>in</strong> high ra<strong>in</strong>fall areas such asthe eastern United States. It is estimatedthat the total value of haystorage <strong>and</strong> feed<strong>in</strong>g losses nationwideexceeds three billion dollars annually!On some farms, such losses account forover 10% of the cost of livestockproduction.These are real, <strong>and</strong> not just potential,losses (time, labor, <strong>and</strong> monetary<strong>in</strong>puts are lost along with the hay).Unfortunately, many producersprobably do not realize how large theirlosses really are, or that with relativelylittle effort or expense they could bereduced considerably. The purpose ofthis publication is to provide <strong>in</strong>formationas to how <strong>and</strong> why hay lossesoccur, <strong>and</strong> how they can be reduced.TYPES OF STORAGE LOSSES<strong>Hay</strong> storage losses vary greatly depend<strong>in</strong>gupon several factors, but storagetechnique is of utmost importance.<strong>Losses</strong> of dry hay stored <strong>in</strong>side a barnare usually of little concern. However,even for barn stored hay, losses risesharply as moisture levels <strong>in</strong>creaseabove 20%, <strong>and</strong> losses from roundbales stored outside under adverseconditions can be much larger.Dur<strong>in</strong>g storage, hay can be subject todry matter losses as well as losses offorage quality.Dry Matter <strong>Losses</strong>Dry matter losses dur<strong>in</strong>g storage resultfrom plant respiration (the cont<strong>in</strong>uationof normal plant processes),microbial activity, <strong>and</strong> weather deterioration.Even at low moisture levels(20% or less) there is some loss due torespiration <strong>and</strong> low numbers ofmicroorganisms, but this is constantacross hay types <strong>and</strong> essentiallyunavoidable.At higher moisture levels (above20%) where mold growth is likely tobe visibly detectable, dry matter lossesare greater, <strong>and</strong> significant levels ofheat<strong>in</strong>g (which can also lower foragequality) occur due to microbial activity.Although numerous bacteria arepresent <strong>in</strong> hay, fungi account for mostof the microbial growth.Heat<strong>in</strong>g of hay is related to moisturecontent. Peak temperature is oftenreached with<strong>in</strong> a week after bal<strong>in</strong>g, butwith higher moisture hay <strong>and</strong> conditionswhich limit heat escape, it maytake as much as three weeks. At safemoisture levels (less than: 20% forrectangular bales; 18% for round bales;<strong>and</strong> 16% for large rectangular packages)<strong>in</strong>side storage losses are typicallyaround 5% of dry matter, but lossesseveral times higher have been reportedfor extremely moist hay.“Weather<strong>in</strong>g” (the term which iscommonly used to refer to the effects2which climatic conditions have on hay)is partially a physical process. Some ofthe dry matter loss which occursdur<strong>in</strong>g outside storage is caused byleach<strong>in</strong>g, which refers to the dissolv<strong>in</strong>g<strong>and</strong> removal of nutrients by the passageof ra<strong>in</strong> water over the surface of, <strong>and</strong>through, the bale. The more digestiblenutrients are, the more soluble theyare, <strong>and</strong> thus the more likely they areto be removed by leach<strong>in</strong>g.The switch from small rectangularbales to large round bales on most U.S.farms has resulted <strong>in</strong> higher storagelosses (<strong>in</strong> many cases, several timeshigher). Round bales are not <strong>in</strong>herentlysubject to greater losses, but they aremuch more likely to be subjected toadverse storage conditions, oftenrema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g outside with no protectionbetween bal<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> feed<strong>in</strong>g. Feed<strong>in</strong>glosses are usually sharply higher withround bales as well, partly because biground bales are generally fed on sodwhile rectangular bales are often fed<strong>in</strong> bunks.The extent of weather<strong>in</strong>g damagedur<strong>in</strong>g outside storage varies ma<strong>in</strong>lywith climatic factors <strong>and</strong> with foragespecies. Weather<strong>in</strong>g primarily affectshay <strong>in</strong> the outside circumference of alarge round bale rather than <strong>in</strong> theends. Consequently, package size(ma<strong>in</strong>ly the diameter) affects theproportion of the bale conta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> thesurface layer, <strong>and</strong> thus the magnitudeof losses (Figure 1).Figure 1. Dry matter loss vs. average spoilage depth <strong>in</strong>round bales of various diameters.*50%40%30%20%10%0%Bale diameter = 3 ft.4 ft.5 ft.6 ft.1 2 3 4 5 6Average spoilage depth (<strong>in</strong>ches)*SOURCE: Buckmaster, D.R., 1993. Evaluator for Round<strong>Hay</strong> Bale <strong>Storage</strong>. J. Prod. Agric., 6:378-385.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!