SEPP 65 & Residential Flat Design Code Review - Australian ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

A checklist would set a minimum standard. The use of a qualified landscapearchitect should be recommended on smaller sites with larger sites (to bedetermined) requiring input from a landscape architect in the site analysis.Demonstration by examples would assist planners and developers.6.2 What percentage of deep soil should be provided on small (for example 0 –850m2), medium (for example 850 – 1500m2) and large (for example 1500 –3000m2 and >3000m2) sites? Should this vary for different contexts? Whatexceptions should apply? Should a minimum dimension, volume or depth beapplied?Ideally deep soil should be mapped within planning controls to ensure continuityacross urban blocks and precincts. Minimum areas should be used as a guideline inthe absence of better strategic planning and will relate, again, to context and desiredfuture character. Minimum dimensions, volumes and depths should berecommended.6.3 Should the fences and walls sections be expanded to provide more guidanceon the public domain interface generally? Should numeric guidance beprovided on desirable or maximum level changes along streets and slopingsites? What maximum level changes would be appropriate?Yes, as this can often be a principal issue with surrounding existing developmentwhere a varied and intricate streetscape can be upset by insensitive newdevelopment. A greater use of the ground plane by ground floor apartments withindividual entries, for example, can provide for a more varied and safer streetenvironment. Most inner urban councils have controls over fencing design but oftendo not consider the scale of a new development on a street. Demonstration byexamples would assist planners and developers.6.4 Should the open space section be expanded to provide further guidance?Should there be flexibility in the percentage of open space requirement fordifferent contexts and in what circumstances? Should there be a requirementthat a percentage of the open space has solar access at certain times of theyear? Should guidance on the number of trees per square metre beprovided? What would be appropriate?Flexibility should be given to differing urban contexts. In suburban contexts onrelatively normal sites often the main designated open space will be overshadowed inwinter. The RFDC lays more emphasis on solar access to private open space at theexpense of COS on a site. Allowance for alternative COS on roof tops and podiamight be permitted in certain contexts. Demonstration by examples would assistplanners and developers.6.5 Is more guidance needed on how to consider impacts on neighbouring lots,other buildings and communal open space? What type of guidance isrequired? Should there be specific guidance for managing the orientation ofmultiple buildings on large sites?Yes, however this ideally should form part of the overall planning of a block orprecinct carried out by Councils or the regional planning authority. For the developerof an individual site to be required to model possible future development adjacent,while necessary now, is an imposition. New software should allow Councils to mapAustralian Institute of Architects (NSW)SEPP 65 & Residential Flat Design Code Review24 February 201211
in 3D and for developers to insert proposed developments within an existing andfuture context. On larger sites consolidating COS in larger areas should berecommended. Demonstration by examples would assist planners and developers.6.6 Should the planting on structures section be expanded to provide furtherguidance? Should the existing 6 soil depth categories be simplified? Howshould this be done? What soil depths are appropriate for suggestedcategories? How should tree categories be defined?More guidance is recommended however it is noted that while the developmentphase is one element, it is the lifetime maintenance and longevity that is as importantto consider. Demonstration by examples would assist planners and developers.6.7.1 Should there be a reduction in car parking rates for sites with good proximityto transport and centres as is the approach in the Affordable Housing SEPP?Yes – they should be consistent. Car parking should be related to a standard codethat relates to the proximity of transport. The RTA has recommended parking rates.However some councils still persist in requiring high parking rates. The City ofBotany Bay for example requires two spaces for every two bedroom apartment whichis substantially more than the two adjoining Councils and works against affordabilityand environmental impacts. A recommendation might be to include parking rates inthe SEPP itself as not being grounds for refusal if based, for example, on the RTA’scode.6.7.2 Is more guidance needed for building design incorporating above ground carparking? Should above ground car parking in centres have ceiling heights thatwill support conversion to another use over time? Should guidance for ongradecar parking be strengthened to provide more assistance about theextent of planting required?Above ground parking floors should be adaptable to other uses. In addition in largemaster planned sites, such as the case in Green Square, above ground parkingshould be planned across whole blocks to allow more flexibility.On-grade parking should be limited to accessible spaces for visitors outside the mainsecurity parking areas. Visitor parking numbers should be within the adopted code.Planting should be integrated with parking with existing trees retained as a priority.6.8 Should this section be renamed accessibility? What additional specificaspects should be included? Should a proportion of ground floor apartmentsbe accessible from the street? What percentage?Yes. The Australian Standards, the BCA, Access to Premises Act and DDA all haverequirements that need to be considered and should be noted in the RFDC.Demonstration by examples would assist planners and developers.7 Residential Flat Design Code – Part 37.1 Should the minimum apartment sizes be reviewed, what sizes would beappropriate? Should minimum room sizes and standard furniture size /dimensions be provided? Do apartment depths and widths need review?What preferred outcomes should guide review of depths and widths (forAustralian Institute of Architects (NSW)SEPP 65 & Residential Flat Design Code Review24 February 201212
Page 1 and 2: Australian Institute ofArchitectsSE
Page 3 and 4: Where does the Institute rank as a
Page 5 and 6: CONTENTSPageA GENERAL 1Guidelines o
Page 8 and 9: the area as a whole. The structure
Page 10 and 11: outside the SEPP when in specific t
Page 12 and 13: In areas of significant development
Page 14 and 15: 5.2 Would defining different contex
Page 18 and 19: example access to daylight and natu
Page 20: 8.2 Should controls be prepared for

SEPP 65 & Residential Flat Design Code Review - Australian ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?