13.07.2015 Views

Evaluation form – critical appraisal of a topic - Australian and New ...

Evaluation form – critical appraisal of a topic - Australian and New ...

Evaluation form – critical appraisal of a topic - Australian and New ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ABN 82 055 042 852Records ManagementCritically Appraise a TopicAUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALANDCOLLEGE OF ANAESTHETISTSSRACritically appraise a <strong>topic</strong> for internal evaluation <strong>and</strong> present it to the departmentThis evaluation <strong>form</strong> should be used by the departmental scholar role tutor or their nominee (who must beeligible to per<strong>form</strong> workplace-based assessments), to evaluate the <strong>critical</strong> <strong>appraisal</strong> <strong>of</strong> a <strong>topic</strong>, undertakenby the trainee <strong>and</strong> presented to the department.The <strong>form</strong> should be forwarded to the supervisor <strong>of</strong> training, for confirmation <strong>of</strong> the activity. Please do notsend the <strong>form</strong> to the College. It may be retained by the trainee for their records.1. PERSONAL INFORMATIONANZCA ID:Family name:First Name:Middle Name:2. EVALUATION DETAILSTitle <strong>of</strong> <strong>critical</strong> <strong>appraisal</strong>:Date <strong>of</strong> departmental presentation:Day Month Year<strong>Evaluation</strong> completed by:3. EVALUATIONDate:Day Month YearNotper<strong>form</strong>edImprovementrequiredWas the <strong>appraisal</strong> focused by a well-built question?(Use <strong>of</strong> PICO <strong>form</strong>at)Comments on question <strong>form</strong>ulation including what was done well <strong>and</strong> what could be improved upon:Per<strong>form</strong>anceacceptableWas an explicit <strong>and</strong> sensible process used to identify <strong>and</strong> select theevidence?Was the evidence appraised the best available to answer the questioni.e. key studies were not overlooked?Comments on search strategy <strong>and</strong> results including what was done well <strong>and</strong> what could be improved upon:28 May 2013PAGE 1 OF 2


ANZCA ID:AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALANDCOLLEGE OF ANAESTHETISTSWere appropriate validity criteria applied to the evidence appraised?Notper<strong>form</strong>edImprovementrequiredPer<strong>form</strong>anceacceptableComments on the <strong>appraisal</strong> <strong>of</strong> the evidence including what was done well <strong>and</strong> what could be improved upon:How strong is the conclusion?Does the <strong>appraisal</strong> address if the conclusion can be applied in theworkplace <strong>and</strong> to patients (where applicable)?Were all clinically important outcomes, benefits, harms <strong>and</strong> costsdiscussed?Has the author introduced a bias based on a conflict <strong>of</strong> interest/stronglyheld belief?Overall comments on production <strong>and</strong> outcome <strong>of</strong> <strong>appraisal</strong> including what was done well <strong>and</strong> what could be improvedupon:Adapted with thanks to the Department <strong>of</strong> Anaesthesia <strong>and</strong> Perioperative Medicine, Monash Health, Victoria, Australia28 May 2013PAGE 2 OF 2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!