- Page 1 and 2:
Coastal Cutthroat Trout as Sentinel
- Page 3 and 4:
3Sea-run cutthroat caught and relea
- Page 5 and 6:
5EXECUTIVE SUMMARYA provincial stra
- Page 7:
74. Cutthroat Nursery Habitat Resto
- Page 10 and 11:
10Cutthroat trout are prized by man
- Page 12 and 13:
12Vancouver Island. Large streams w
- Page 14 and 15:
14excessively warm and too low in d
- Page 16 and 17:
16prefer pools in allopatric condit
- Page 18 and 19:
18that are warmer and more producti
- Page 20 and 21:
20Comparative benefits to densities
- Page 22 and 23:
222, 23 % saltwater age 3 and 15 %
- Page 24 and 25:
24are sexually immature (Leider 199
- Page 26 and 27:
26management concerns are related t
- Page 28 and 29:
28practices. Life-history profiling
- Page 30 and 31:
30available in south coastal Britis
- Page 32 and 33:
32Cutthroat smolt survivals are abo
- Page 34 and 35:
34unproductive or oligotrophic stre
- Page 36 and 37:
36were only small variable numbers
- Page 38 and 39:
38Populations of juvenile cutthroat
- Page 40 and 41:
40Unlike flood boxes with sluice ty
- Page 42 and 43:
42weight/m 2 /yr (Wipfli and Gregov
- Page 44 and 45:
44juvenile fish and non-target spec
- Page 46 and 47:
46Figure 12. Trend in sea-run cutth
- Page 48 and 49:
48at Hood Canal in Puget Sound (Big
- Page 50 and 51:
50years owing to operational constr
- Page 52 and 53:
5249 adult cutthroat were counted (
- Page 54 and 55: 54Table 4. Areas of anadromous and
- Page 56 and 57: 56population estimation and samplin
- Page 58 and 59: 58Clayburn Creek, Draper Creek, Win
- Page 60 and 61: 60females in 2000; hatchery females
- Page 62 and 63: 625.2.4. Cutthroat Stream Stock Man
- Page 64 and 65: 64Table 7. Cutthroat lake (stream)
- Page 66 and 67: 66because piscivorous Taylor Lake c
- Page 68 and 69: 68and- Angler use was largely at th
- Page 70 and 71: 70spawners. This suggests that prot
- Page 72 and 73: 72• Public education initiative t
- Page 74 and 75: 74Management Strategy 3: Recovery o
- Page 76 and 77: 76successful (Ptolemy 1997), and fu
- Page 78 and 79: 78It is widely assumed that most ad
- Page 80 and 81: 80annual frequency of repeat spawne
- Page 82 and 83: 82• Refinement of the minimum siz
- Page 84 and 85: 848. ReferencesAndrusak, H. and T.G
- Page 86 and 87: 86Clark, B.J. 1988. The status of c
- Page 88 and 89: 88Glova, G. L.1987. Comparison of a
- Page 90 and 91: 90Knight, R. and J. Teskey. 1992. H
- Page 92 and 93: 92eastern Fraser Valley. Prepared f
- Page 94 and 95: 94Thomson, A.R. and Associates. 200
- Page 96 and 97: 969. GlossaryIt should be noted tha
- Page 98 and 99: 98large woody debris (LWD): Entire
- Page 100 and 101: 100Appendix 1. Known coastal cutthr
- Page 102 and 103: 102CHEAMSLOUGHCHEEKYERIVERCHEHALISR