- Page 1: Coastal Cutthroat Trout as Sentinel
- Page 5 and 6: 5EXECUTIVE SUMMARYA provincial stra
- Page 7: 74. Cutthroat Nursery Habitat Resto
- Page 10 and 11: 10Cutthroat trout are prized by man
- Page 12 and 13: 12Vancouver Island. Large streams w
- Page 14 and 15: 14excessively warm and too low in d
- Page 16 and 17: 16prefer pools in allopatric condit
- Page 18 and 19: 18that are warmer and more producti
- Page 20 and 21: 20Comparative benefits to densities
- Page 22 and 23: 222, 23 % saltwater age 3 and 15 %
- Page 24 and 25: 24are sexually immature (Leider 199
- Page 26 and 27: 26management concerns are related t
- Page 28 and 29: 28practices. Life-history profiling
- Page 30 and 31: 30available in south coastal Britis
- Page 32 and 33: 32Cutthroat smolt survivals are abo
- Page 34 and 35: 34unproductive or oligotrophic stre
- Page 36 and 37: 36were only small variable numbers
- Page 38 and 39: 38Populations of juvenile cutthroat
- Page 40 and 41: 40Unlike flood boxes with sluice ty
- Page 42 and 43: 42weight/m 2 /yr (Wipfli and Gregov
- Page 44 and 45: 44juvenile fish and non-target spec
- Page 46 and 47: 46Figure 12. Trend in sea-run cutth
- Page 48 and 49: 48at Hood Canal in Puget Sound (Big
- Page 50 and 51: 50years owing to operational constr
- Page 52 and 53:
5249 adult cutthroat were counted (
- Page 54 and 55:
54Table 4. Areas of anadromous and
- Page 56 and 57:
56population estimation and samplin
- Page 58 and 59:
58Clayburn Creek, Draper Creek, Win
- Page 60 and 61:
60females in 2000; hatchery females
- Page 62 and 63:
625.2.4. Cutthroat Stream Stock Man
- Page 64 and 65:
64Table 7. Cutthroat lake (stream)
- Page 66 and 67:
66because piscivorous Taylor Lake c
- Page 68 and 69:
68and- Angler use was largely at th
- Page 70 and 71:
70spawners. This suggests that prot
- Page 72 and 73:
72• Public education initiative t
- Page 74 and 75:
74Management Strategy 3: Recovery o
- Page 76 and 77:
76successful (Ptolemy 1997), and fu
- Page 78 and 79:
78It is widely assumed that most ad
- Page 80 and 81:
80annual frequency of repeat spawne
- Page 82 and 83:
82• Refinement of the minimum siz
- Page 84 and 85:
848. ReferencesAndrusak, H. and T.G
- Page 86 and 87:
86Clark, B.J. 1988. The status of c
- Page 88 and 89:
88Glova, G. L.1987. Comparison of a
- Page 90 and 91:
90Knight, R. and J. Teskey. 1992. H
- Page 92 and 93:
92eastern Fraser Valley. Prepared f
- Page 94 and 95:
94Thomson, A.R. and Associates. 200
- Page 96 and 97:
969. GlossaryIt should be noted tha
- Page 98 and 99:
98large woody debris (LWD): Entire
- Page 100 and 101:
100Appendix 1. Known coastal cutthr
- Page 102 and 103:
102CHEAMSLOUGHCHEEKYERIVERCHEHALISR
- Page 104:
104CRANBY LAKE LAKE ERROCK SAKINAW