- Page 1 and 2: What Kind ofEuropeanBudget for 2013
- Page 3 and 4: ContentsAbstract 3Foreword 4Conclud
- Page 8 and 9: contributing countries of the West
- Page 10 and 11: udgetary solidarity (the distributi
- Page 12 and 13: The advantage of the “defense fun
- Page 14 and 15: The European Budget at the Test of
- Page 16 and 17: decision, which in turn leads to a
- Page 18 and 19: Graph 2. The Distribution of Commit
- Page 20 and 21: covered the 10 adhering countries u
- Page 22 and 23: Since 1984, the Germans have obtain
- Page 24 and 25: Graph 6. Share of Each country in O
- Page 26 and 27: Graph 9. Beneficiaries and Net Cont
- Page 28 and 29: though its reunification rendered i
- Page 30 and 31: (contributions being due only for t
- Page 32 and 33: illion Euros at 1999 prices, the ne
- Page 34 and 35: The importance of “new policies
- Page 36 and 37: 4.2. ExpenditureThe Commission has
- Page 38 and 39: of an intergovernmental nature) and
- Page 40 and 41: category “other old Member States
- Page 42 and 43: In the absence of any correction of
- Page 44 and 45: The application of this mechanism w
- Page 46 and 47: mechanism. Another solution would b
- Page 48 and 49: Future of the EU Budget and Financi
- Page 50 and 51: And, finally, the fifth part shows
- Page 52 and 53: developing other common policies an
- Page 54 and 55: price pegging and export subsidies
- Page 56 and 57:
superficially and quickly. Furtherm
- Page 58 and 59:
governments to apply themselves the
- Page 60 and 61:
Le Cacheux, Jacques (dir.) (1996),
- Page 62 and 63:
The 1987 Single European Act introd
- Page 64 and 65:
and the introduction of tolls in mo
- Page 66 and 67:
political stability and to the fina
- Page 68 and 69:
patterns of the economy is essentia
- Page 70 and 71:
Portugal continues to have very low
- Page 72 and 73:
funds to training for civil servant
- Page 74 and 75:
Regional and Cohesion Policy After
- Page 76 and 77:
The aim of the ESF is to promote em
- Page 78 and 79:
2001 the GDP per capita (in terms o
- Page 80 and 81:
Lithuania, it amounts to 40-44% of
- Page 82 and 83:
concerns certain Spanish, Greek and
- Page 84 and 85:
GNP is less than 90% of the Communi
- Page 86 and 87:
eligibility for an aid will be regi
- Page 88 and 89:
Towards a European Budget Dedicated
- Page 90 and 91:
In spite of the various obstacles t
- Page 92 and 93:
- A budgetary building should be in
- Page 94 and 95:
The A2 line aims at the opening of
- Page 96 and 97:
- The existence of adequate disposi
- Page 98 and 99:
the adoption, the enforcement and t
- Page 100 and 101:
The Council not having the capacity
- Page 102 and 103:
Part ThreeEuropean Budget and Polit
- Page 104 and 105:
Community will require a framework
- Page 106 and 107:
provides for the efficient counter-
- Page 108 and 109:
Graph 3. Euroland Output Gaps and E
- Page 110 and 111:
the overall stability of the aggreg
- Page 112 and 113:
4. Integrating European and Nationa
- Page 114 and 115:
4.3. Harmonizing European Preferenc
- Page 116 and 117:
MacDougall Report (1977), EC Commis
- Page 118 and 119:
1.1.1. The advantages of the curren
- Page 120 and 121:
- Finally, the computing modalities
- Page 122 and 123:
money, by the tax. The tax was alwa
- Page 124 and 125:
eceives in return. This type of cal
- Page 126 and 127:
2.1.2. The evoked oppositions• Bu
- Page 128 and 129:
2.2. Possible OpeningsIn spite of a
- Page 130 and 131:
It is also necessary to reassure:-
- Page 132 and 133:
• Evaluation testTwo ways seem to
- Page 134 and 135:
Part FourThree Alternative Scenario
- Page 136 and 137:
- a “competitiveness-solidarity
- Page 138 and 139:
1.2. Analysis of Net BalancesAccord
- Page 140 and 141:
2. “Competitiveness-Solidarity”
- Page 142 and 143:
improvement in their situation; Spa
- Page 144 and 145:
order programs (objective 3). The k
- Page 146 and 147:
3.2. Analysis of Net BalancesPrior
- Page 148 and 149:
Graph 1. Comparison of Net Balances
- Page 150:
the poorest countries, but it is sy