13.07.2015 Views

High quality care for all NHS Next Stage Review - Antibiotic Action

High quality care for all NHS Next Stage Review - Antibiotic Action

High quality care for all NHS Next Stage Review - Antibiotic Action

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>High</strong> Quality Care For All – <strong>NHS</strong> <strong>Next</strong> <strong>Stage</strong> <strong>Review</strong> Final Report5115. In primary <strong>care</strong>, the Quality andOutcomes Framework alreadyprovides a range of valuable data on<strong>quality</strong>, particularly <strong>for</strong> the <strong>quality</strong>of <strong>care</strong> <strong>for</strong> people with long-termconditions. Chapter 3 set out howwe will ensure GP practices willhave incentives and opportunitiesto engage in prevention activity. Wewill introduce a new strategy <strong>for</strong>developing the Quality and OutcomesFramework, which will includean independent and transparentprocess <strong>for</strong> developing and reviewingindicators. We will discuss with NICEand with stakeholders includingpatient groups and professionalbodies how this new process shouldwork. We will discuss how to reducethe number of organisational orprocess indicators, and refocusresources on new indicators ofprevention and clinical effectiveness.We will explore the scope to givegreater flexibility to PCTs to workwith primary health<strong>care</strong> teams toselect <strong>quality</strong> indicators (from anational menu) that reflect localhealth improvement priorities.Publishing <strong>quality</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance16. Commitments have been madeover a number of years to publishin<strong>for</strong>mation on clinical effectiveness. 91Too often these commitments havebeen held up by uncertainties aboutwhat was needed to make progress91 The publication of surgical outcomes wasrecommended by the then Secretary of State <strong>for</strong>Health’s Response to the Bristol Royal InfirmaryInquiry on 18 July 2001, who acknowledged thatthis would take time as such data needed to be“robust, rigorous and risk-adjusted.”and disagreements about who shouldbe in charge. This is unacceptable.We should be seeking to create amore transparent <strong>NHS</strong>. It may be acomplex task, but we should developacceptable methodologies and thencollect and publish in<strong>for</strong>mation sothat patients and their <strong>care</strong>rs canmake better in<strong>for</strong>med choices, clinicalteams can benchmark, compareand improve their per<strong>for</strong>mance andcommissioners and providers canagree priorities <strong>for</strong> improvement.17. There<strong>for</strong>e, to help make <strong>quality</strong>in<strong>for</strong>mation available, we will require,in legislation, health<strong>care</strong> providersworking <strong>for</strong> or on behalf of the <strong>NHS</strong>to publish their ‘Quality Accounts’from April 2010 – just as they publishfinancial accounts. These will bereports to the public on the <strong>quality</strong> ofservices they provide in every serviceline – looking at safety, experienceand outcomes. Easy-to-understand,comparative in<strong>for</strong>mation will beavailable on the <strong>NHS</strong> Choices websiteat the same time. The Care QualityCommission will provide independentvalidation of provider andcommissioner per<strong>for</strong>mance, usingindicators of <strong>quality</strong> agreed nation<strong>all</strong>ywith DH, and publish an assessmentof comparative per<strong>for</strong>mance.18.The CQC will publish an annualreport to Parliament on the provisionof <strong>NHS</strong> <strong>care</strong> within England. Buildingon the strengths of the Health<strong>care</strong>Commission and the Commission <strong>for</strong>Social Care Inspection, the CQC willthere<strong>for</strong>e provide assurance <strong>for</strong> thepublic that in<strong>for</strong>mation about the<strong>quality</strong> of <strong>care</strong> is reliable.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!