13.07.2015 Views

Nature, Not Human Activity, Rules the Climate - Science ...

Nature, Not Human Activity, Rules the Climate - Science ...

Nature, Not Human Activity, Rules the Climate - Science ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

climate. <strong>Science</strong> 254: 698-700.Gallego et al, 2006. Change in frequency and intensity ofdaily precipitation over <strong>the</strong> Iberian Peninsula. J. Geoph. Res.111, D24105, doi: 10.1029/2006JD0077280.Gleadow, R.M., Foley, W.J. and Woodrow, I.E. 1998.Enhanced CO2 alters <strong>the</strong> relationship betweenphotosyn<strong>the</strong>sis and defense in cyanogenic Eucalyptuscladocalyx F. Muell. Plant Cell Environ. 21: 12-22.Goldenberg, S.B., C.W. Landsea, A.M. Mestas-Nunez, andW.M. Gray 2001. The recent increase in Atlantic hurricaneactivity: Causes and implications. <strong>Science</strong> 293: 474-479.Goodrich, J.D. 1996. Comments on Regional Simulations ofGreenhouse Warming Including Natural Variability. Bulletinof <strong>the</strong> American Meteorological Society 77:3-4 (July).Gouretski, V. and K.P. Koltermann 2007. How much is <strong>the</strong>ocean really warming? Geophysical Research Letters 34L01610.Haigh, J.D. 1996: The impact of solar variability on climate.<strong>Science</strong> 272: 981-985.Haigh, J.D. 2003. The effects of solar variability on <strong>the</strong>Earth’s climate. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London Ser. A 361:95-111.Hall, B. 2007. http://hallofrecord.blogspot.com/2007/02/extreme-temperatures-wheres-global.html.Hansen, J.E. 2006. The threat to <strong>the</strong> planet. New YorkReview of Books 53, July 13, 2006.Hansen, J.E., et al. 1998. <strong>Climate</strong> forcings in <strong>the</strong> industrialera. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95: 12753-12758.Hansen, J.E., et al. 2005. Earth’s energy imbalance:Confirmations and implications. <strong>Science</strong> 308 (5727):1431-1435.Hayden, H. 2007. Private communication.Held, I.M., and B.J. Soden 2006. Robust responses of <strong>the</strong>hydrological cycle to global warming. J. Clim. 19: 5686-5699.Henderson, D. 2005. SRES, IPCC, and <strong>the</strong> Treatment ofEconomic Issues: What Has Emerged. Energy andEnvironment 16 (3 & 4).Holgate, S.J. 2006. On <strong>the</strong> decadal rates of sea-level changeduring <strong>the</strong> twentieth century. Geophys Res Lett 34. DOI:10.1029/2006GL028492,2007.Idso, C.D. and Idso, K.E. 2000. Forecasting world foodsupplies: The impact of <strong>the</strong> rising atmospheric CO2concentration. Technology 7S: 33-56.Idso, K.E. 1992. Plant responses to rising levels of carbondioxide: A compilation and analysis of <strong>the</strong> results of adecade of international research into <strong>the</strong> direct biologicaleffects of atmospheric CO2 enrichment. ClimatologicalPublications Scientific Paper #23, Office of Climatology,Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ.Idso, K.E. and Idso, S.B. 1994. Plant responses toatmospheric CO2 enrichment in <strong>the</strong> face of environmentalconstraints: A review of <strong>the</strong> past 10 years’ research.Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 69: 153-203.Idso, S.B. 1989. Carbon Dioxide: Friend or Foe? IBR Press,Tempe, AZ.Idso, S.B., and Quinn, J.A. 1983. Vegetational Redistributionin Arizona and New Mexico in Response to a Doubling of<strong>the</strong> Atmospheric CO2 Concentration. Laboratory ofClimatology, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona.Information Quality Act 2004. www.it.ojp.gov/documents/crs_iq_act_omb_guidance_and_implementation.pdf.IPCC 2008. “About IPCC,” http://www.ipcc.ch/about/index.htm, accessed 2/15/08.IPCC-AR4 2007. <strong>Climate</strong> Change 2007: The Physical<strong>Science</strong> Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to <strong>the</strong>Fourth Assessment Report of <strong>the</strong> Intergovernmental Panel on<strong>Climate</strong> Change. Cambridge University Press.IPCC-FAR 1990. Scientific Assessment of <strong>Climate</strong> Change.Contribution of Working Group I to <strong>the</strong> First AssessmentReport of <strong>the</strong> Intergovernmental Panel on <strong>Climate</strong> Change.Cambridge University Press.IPCC-SAR 1996. <strong>Climate</strong> Change 1995: The <strong>Science</strong> of<strong>Climate</strong> Change. Contribution of Working Group I to <strong>the</strong>Second Assessment Report of <strong>the</strong> Intergovernmental Panelon <strong>Climate</strong> Change, Cambridge University Press.IPCC-TAR 2001. <strong>Climate</strong> Change 2001: The ScientificBasis. Contribution of Working Group I to <strong>the</strong> ThirdAssessment Report of <strong>the</strong> Intergovernmental Panel on<strong>Climate</strong> Change. Cambridge University Press.Jaworowski, Z. 1994. Ancient atmosphere - validity of icerecords. Environmental <strong>Science</strong> & Pollution Research 1(3):161-171.Jaworowski Z., Segalstad T.V., and Ono N. 1992. Doglaciers tell a true atmospheric CO 2 story? The <strong>Science</strong> of <strong>the</strong>Total Environment 114: 227-284.Karl, T.R., S.J. Hassol, C.D. Miller, and W.L. Murray (eds.)2006. Temperature Trends in <strong>the</strong> Lower Atmosphere: Stepsfor Understanding and Reconciling Differences. A report by<strong>the</strong> <strong>Climate</strong> Change <strong>Science</strong> Program and Subcommittee onGlobal Change Research, http://www.climatescience.gov/Library/sap/sap1-1/finalreport/default.htm.Karl and Knight, 1998. Secular trend of precipitationamount, frequency and intensity in <strong>the</strong> United States. Bull.Am. Met. Soc. 79: 231 - 242.32

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!