NATIONAL THEME: Protect <strong>Forest</strong>s from Harm<strong>Forest</strong> condition or health can be assessed by examining the interactionsbetween three components: a for est’s resilience to disturbance; its abilityto sustain a natural range of biological diversity; and its ability to meet thecurrent and future needs of people in terms of values, products and services(CSFS 2002). The majority of <strong>Colorado</strong>’s forested landscapes are considereddisturbance driven, meaning their condition is integrally linked with naturalcycles of wildfi re and insect and disease infestations, as well as periodicfl ooding, avalanches or windstorms. Without this regular rejuvenation, forestscan become overcrowded and less diverse than they were in the past. Thestress of competing for sunlight, water and other essential resources underthese conditions renders trees vulnerable to insect and disease activity, fi re ordrought, and sets the stage for much faster and more devastating events tomove across the landscape (CSFS 2002).In <strong>Colorado</strong>, the lack of regular disturbance is the culprit behind many of thestate’s forest health challenges. More than a century of virtual fi re exclusion,along with changes in land management priorities and practices, have leftmany of the state’s forests highly susceptible to wildfi re, insects and disease.Recent cycles of drought and the emerging impacts of climate change furtherexacerbate this situation.Restore Fire-Adapted Lands and Reduce Risk of Wildfire ImpactsOverview: Although fi re is only one of many processes that operate withina forest, it often is such a dominant process that to a great degree it candetermine the composition, structure and dynamics of the entire ecosystem(Pyne 1996). Over thousands of years, forests and associated vegetationhave adapted to a certain cycle and intensity of fi re. These adaptations, suchas thick bark or serotinous cones, enable vegetation to respond favorablyto these naturally recurring events. When fi re does not occur according tothese cycles, forest resilience can decrease and fi re events that do occur cancause long-term damage to soil, vegetation, wildlife and other ecosystemcomponents (Pyne 1996).In an effort to better classify the role fi re plays in various ecosystems,scientists have identifi ed fi ve primary fi re regimes that describe the frequencyand characteristics of historic (pre-settlement) fi res. In Fire Regime I, forexample, fi res return every 1 to 35 years, are of low to mixed severity, andgenerally replace less than 25 percent of the dominant overstory vegetation.In Fire Regime V, fi res occur every 200 years or more and usually are standreplacing. In recent years, scientists and land managers have developedan additional system to classify and assess the role of fi re using fi re regimecondition class (FRCC). This classifi cation ranks ecosystems from 1 to 3based on their level of departure from a set of reference conditions that refl ectthe vegetation and structure that would have existed on the landscape prior toEuropean settlement (FRCC Guidebook 2008).In <strong>Colorado</strong>, LANDFIRE data indicate that the forest types on 6.8 million acreshave signifi cantly departed from expected reference conditions. The primarycause of this departure is a management philosophy that virtually excludedfi re from the landscape for over a century. This exclusion has been particularlydamaging to forests in <strong>Colorado</strong>, including ponderosa pine, mixed conifer andpiñon-juniper, which evolved with frequent, low- to moderate-intensity fi res.26
Analysis: <strong>Forest</strong> management, such as mechanical thinning of overly densestands and use of prescribed fi re, can reduce unwanted wildfi re impactsby increasing forest resilience and restoring fi re to a more natural role onthe landscape. As part of this assessment, two data layers were analyzedto identify areas where forest management could play a benefi cial role inrestoring fi re-adapted lands and reducing the risk of negative fi re impactsto both the environment and human values. These layers are focused on:1) wildfi re susceptibility, and 2) potential for wildfi re intensity. While theselayers are useful on their own, they also can provide valuable informationwhen combined with other data related to water supply, wildlife habitat,recreation and the wildland-urban interface.Wildfire SusceptibilityThe fi rst wildfi re-related layer is the product of a 2008 analysis done by theSanborn Map Company for the CSFS in order to identify forested areasacross the state with a high susceptibility to fi re starts. 25 To produce this layer,Sanborn developed a Wildfi re Susceptibility Index (WFSI) for the forestedareas of <strong>Colorado</strong> based on the probability of fi re occurrence and predictedrate of spread once a fi re started. Key inputs to this analysis included weather,historic fi re occurrences, topography, surface fuels and canopy closure. 26Sanborn worked with local fi re behavior specialists to update the underlyingdataset to account for changes in vegetative condition and structure due tolarge wildland fi res and mountain pine beetle, and other insect and diseaseepidemics that have occurred since the LANDFIRE data were collected. TheEastern Plains were not included in the assessment because LANDFIRE datawas not available at the time of the assessment.This layer shows more than 2 million acres with a high to very high WFSI in<strong>Colorado</strong>. While all of the state’s forest types contain some acreage in thesecategories, the majority of the high rankings fall in piñon-juniper forests,followed by ponderosa pine forests and oak shrublands. Notably, privatelandowners control nearly 800,000 acres in the high to very high categories,followed by the BLM and then the USFS. <strong>Forest</strong> management in landscapesranked high to very high could be benefi cial for mitigating hazardousconditions in areas where fi re starts and rapid fi re spread are likely.25For more information on the Sanborn Map Company, Inc., please see their website at www.sanmap.com.26It is important to note that the output of this analysis is limited by the lack of consistent and complete fire reportingdata across all jurisdictions in the state.27
- Page 1 and 2: Colorado Statewide ForestResource A
- Page 3: Table of ContentsI. Executive Summa
- Page 6 and 7: II.BackgroundThe Colorado Statewide
- Page 8 and 9: National Guidance for Statewide For
- Page 10 and 11: III. Overview of Colorado’s Fores
- Page 12 and 13: Spruce-Fir 9Spruce-fi r is among th
- Page 14 and 15: Mixed Conifer 14The mixed conifer f
- Page 16 and 17: Oak ShrublandsOak shrublands cover
- Page 18 and 19: Windbreaks, shelterbelts and their
- Page 20 and 21: Owner Spruce-Fir Lodgepole Aspen Mi
- Page 22 and 23: forest management costs per acre ha
- Page 24 and 25: include standard ownership data and
- Page 26 and 27: The second metric is an estimate of
- Page 28 and 29: Map 4 - Colorado Forest Legacy Area
- Page 32 and 33: Map 7 - Wildland Fire Susceptibilit
- Page 34 and 35: Map 8 - Wildland Fire Intensity Ind
- Page 36 and 37: ot (CSFS 2001 and 2002). Some insec
- Page 38 and 39: Map 10 - Insect and Disease Mitigat
- Page 40 and 41: is legally mandated, as well as dal
- Page 42 and 43: change, including species extinctio
- Page 44 and 45: transport of materi als that can ad
- Page 46 and 47: Map 15 - Post-Fire Erosion RiskMap
- Page 48 and 49: environment, many homes and other s
- Page 50 and 51: Owner 0.5 mile 1 mile 2 mile TotalU
- Page 52 and 53: Map 18 - Wildland-Urban Interface w
- Page 54 and 55: Map 20 - Wildland-Urban Interface w
- Page 56 and 57: They also are important partners in
- Page 58 and 59: Forest TypeAcres for Wood Products
- Page 60 and 61: of fragmentation to help forest man
- Page 62 and 63: Forest Type Low Moderate High Very
- Page 64 and 65: Map 25 - Important Habitat for Econ
- Page 66 and 67: ACRESImp. Habitat for Econ.Imp. Spe
- Page 68 and 69: Forest Type Low Moderate High Very
- Page 70 and 71: Map 28 - Community Forestry Opportu
- Page 72 and 73: Enhance Public Benefits from Trees
- Page 78 and 79: VI. ReferencesAlexander, K. [Intern
- Page 80 and 81:
Neely, B., Comer, P., Moritz, C., L
- Page 82 and 83:
VII. Statewide Assessment Steering
- Page 84 and 85:
APPENDIX A - Colorado Statewide For
- Page 86 and 87:
• Identify and conserve high prio
- Page 88 and 89:
assessments and resource strategies
- Page 90 and 91:
National Theme: Protect Forests fro
- Page 92 and 93:
Protect, conserve, and enhance wild
- Page 94:
States are encouraged to draw from