13.07.2015 Views

Analysis of Air Transportation Systems Fundamentals of Aircraft ...

Analysis of Air Transportation Systems Fundamentals of Aircraft ...

Analysis of Air Transportation Systems Fundamentals of Aircraft ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Introductory Remarks<strong>Air</strong> vehicles are significant different than their groundvehicle counterparts in three aspects:• Most aircraft require a prepared surface to operate fromwhich affects the overall capability <strong>of</strong> the vehicle to carryuseful payload• <strong>Air</strong>craft operate in a dynamic atmospheric environmentwhere changes in temperature, density, and speed <strong>of</strong>sound are drastic and cannot be neglected• <strong>Air</strong>craft mass expenditures are significant and thus needto be accounted for in the air vehicle performanceanalysis. For example, a Boeing 747-400 can take<strong>of</strong>f atnear 390 metric tons and yet land at its destination at 220Virginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 2


metric tons thus making the fuel expenditure asignificant factor in how the vehicle performs along theflight path• The analysis <strong>of</strong> NAS performance is related to theperformance <strong>of</strong> the vehicles operating in it (i.e., airportrunway and airspace sector capacity depends on aircraftcharacteristics)• The analysis <strong>of</strong> airline operations requires a carefulexamination <strong>of</strong> the aircraft performance that matches aspecific route segment (i.e., DOC, travel time, seatingcapacity, etc.)Virginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 3


<strong>Air</strong>craft Performance Basics(International Standard Atmosphere)Virginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 4


Assumptions <strong>of</strong> the International StandardAtmosphere• Linear variation in temperature with altitude up to 11,000meters (Troposphere)• Constant temperature betwen 11,000 and 82,300 ft (25.1kilometers) in the so-called stratosphere region• Linearly increasing temperature from 82,300 ft. andabove• Most <strong>of</strong> the analysis we do in this class requiresknowledge <strong>of</strong> temeperature variations up to 15,600meters (51,000 ft.) thus only the first two layers <strong>of</strong> theatmosphere are <strong>of</strong> interest to usVirginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 5


Basic Relationships to Uderstand theAtmosphereEquation <strong>of</strong> state:p = !RT(1)where:pis the air pressure (N/m 2 ),constant (287 N-m/ o K),Tis the absolute air temperature ( o K)!Ris the universal gasis the air density (kg/m 3 ), andVirginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 6


Basic Relationships (Hydrostatic Equation)the hydrostatic equation that relates air pressure, densityand height above sea level <strong>of</strong> a fluid is,dp=where: is rate <strong>of</strong> change in air pressure, is thegravity constant (9.81 m/s 2 ), is the air density (kg/m 3 ),h–!gdhdpand is the altitude <strong>of</strong> the fluid element above sea levelconditions (m)Note: For derivations <strong>of</strong> these equations consult any fluiddynamics textbook or aerodynamics text!g(2)Virginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 7


Atmosphere with Constant TemperatureUsing equations (1) and (2),dp-----p=–gdh------------RT(3)This equation can be integrated to obtain a basicrelationship between atmospheric pressures at variouslayers in the atmosphere as a function <strong>of</strong> altitudep"dp-----p=h"h 0–gdh------------RT(4)p 0where the subindex0denotes a reference condition.Virginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 8


Atmosphere with Constant Temperaturep--- = ep 0g– ------# % RT$& ( h – h0 )(5)and!---- = e! 0g– ------# % RT$& ( h – h0 )(6)if the temperature is constant - isothermal layer (only truein the stratosphere).In this analysis we have assumed a constant value for thegravity constant. This is a good approximation in thetropopause and stratosphere.Virginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 9


Atmosphere with Linear Temperature VariationAccording to the International Standard Atmosphere(ISA), the variation <strong>of</strong> temperature is linear up to 11,000meters. Then,dTT = T o + '( h – h o ) = T o + ----- ( h – h o )dhwhere:'=dT-----dhis the temperature lapse rate withaltitude (i.e., rate <strong>of</strong> change in temperature with altitude)(7)andT 0is the reference temperature (typically sea level)Virginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 10


Atmosphere with Linear Temperature VariationSincedh=dT-----'using the equation (4) we find anexpression to relate the change in pressure with altitude ina non-isothermal layer <strong>of</strong> the atmosphere,p"p 0dp-----p=h"h 0–g------ dT -----R' T(8)p---p 0=T----# % $&T 0g– ------# % R' $&(9)Virginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 11


Atmosphere with Linear Temperature VariationUsing the equation <strong>of</strong> state for two refence points (sealevel denoted by subidex zero and at altitude denoted bya function <strong>of</strong> altitude:p---p 0=----!----T# % $&! 0T o(10)----!! 0=----T# % $&T 0g– ------# % R' $& – 1(11)Virginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 12


Reference Values <strong>of</strong> Interest at ISA ConditionsConstantValueT 0'! op oaRreference temperature 273.2 o Ktemperature lapse rate -0.0065 o K per meterair density 1.225 kg/m 3air pressure 101,325 N/m 2speed <strong>of</strong> sound340.3 m/suniversal gas constant 287 N-m/ o KVirginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 13


International Standard AtmosphereCharacteristics <strong>of</strong> the International Standard Atmosphere.GeopotentialAltitude (m.)Temperature ( o K)TDensity (kg/m 3 )!0 288.2 1.225 340.31000 281.7 1.112 336.42000 275.2 1.007 332.53000 268.7 0.909 328.64000 262.2 0.819 324.65000 255.7 0.736 320.56000 249.2 0.660 316.47000 242.7 0.589 312.38000 236.2 0.525 308.1Speed <strong>of</strong> Sound(m/s)aVirginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 14


Characteristics <strong>of</strong> the International Standard Atmosphere.GeopotentialAltitude (m.)Temperature ( o K)TDensity (kg/m 3 )!9000 229.7 0.466 303.810000 223.2 0.413 299.511000 216.7 0.364 295.112000 216.7 0.311 295.113000 216.7 0.266 295.114000 216.7 0.227 295.115000 216.7 0.194 295.116000 216.7 0.169 295.1Speed <strong>of</strong> Sound(m/s)aVirginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 15


Important <strong>Air</strong>craft Speed Terms to KnowIndicated <strong>Air</strong>speed (IAS) - is the speed registered in thecockpit instrumentTrue <strong>Air</strong>speed (TAS) - is the actual speed <strong>of</strong> the vehiclewith respect <strong>of</strong> the mass <strong>of</strong> air surrounding the aircraft(accounts for compressibility effects)Calibrated <strong>Air</strong>speed (CAS) - similar to IAS but correctedfor instrument position errors (airflow problems outsidethe vehicle).Ground speed (GS) - TAS corrected for windStalling Speed (V stall) - minimum speed for safe flightVirginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 16


Mach Number - ratio <strong>of</strong> the aircraft speed to thespeed <strong>of</strong> sound, a (note a varies with altitude)Mach number can be easily computed using the followingequation,a=(RT(12)where:Ris the universal gas constant (287 N-m/ o K),(( = 1.4is the air temperature ( o K) andheat at constant volume ( for air)is the ratio <strong>of</strong> specificTVirginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 17


<strong>Air</strong> Compressibility EffectsA mathematical expression to estimate true airspeed (interms <strong>of</strong> true Mach number) from CAS follows:M true 5 ! 0---- 1 0.2 V CAS------------! # % 661.5$& 2 3.5=+– 1# % $& + 10.286– 1(13)where: M true is the true mach number, V CAS is the calibratedairspeed in knots (CAS = IAS) in our analysis, ! 0 is theatmospheric density at sea level, ! is the density at thealtitude the aircraft is flying, and the constants 0.2 and661.5 account for the specific heat <strong>of</strong> the air and the speed<strong>of</strong> sound at sea level (in knots), respectively.Virginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 18


Defining true mach number ( M true ) as the ratio <strong>of</strong> thetrue aircraft speed ( V TAS ) and the speed <strong>of</strong> sound ( a) at theflight level in question we have,V TAS=aM true(14)Virginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 19


Example ComputationBoeing 737-300 (a medium size jet transport) flies at 250knots (IAS) at an altitude <strong>of</strong> 5.0 km. in a standardatmosphere. What is TAS?A quick glance at the ISA Table reveals that air density at5.0 km. is about 0.736 kg/m 3 thus resulting in a true machnumber <strong>of</strong> 0.4824 (use Equation 10).Since the speed <strong>of</strong> sound at that altitude is 320.5 m/s (seeTable) then the true airspeed <strong>of</strong> the aircraft is 154.62 m/sor 300.56 knots.Virginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 20


Sample Computation (continuation)Note that in this case there is a difference <strong>of</strong> 50.56 knotsbetween IAS and TAS.As the aircraft climbs the value <strong>of</strong> TAS increases even ifIAS remains constant. True <strong>Air</strong>speed (TAS) is needed toestimate Ground Speed (GS).GS is ultimately responsible for the travel time betweenairports and thus it is important to learn how to estimateTAS for any feasible flight condition.Later analysis will introduce more details on how toestimate travel times between Origin-Destination airportsVirginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 21


Sample Matlab Code Used (ISAM.m)Virginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 22


Plot <strong>of</strong> True Mach Number vs. AltitudeVirginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 23


Plot <strong>of</strong> CAS vs. TAS (Subsonic <strong>Air</strong>craft)Virginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 24


<strong>Air</strong>craft Performance Estimation(Runway Length)Virginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 25


<strong>Air</strong>craft Runway Length PerformanceEstimationCritical issue in airport engineering and planning (errorsin runway length are costly to the operator and perhapsunsafe)LTED)mgF fFigure 1.Forces Acting in the <strong>Air</strong>craft During Take<strong>of</strong>f.Virginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 26


NomenclatureT - thrust force (also called tractive effort) provided by thevehicle powerplantL- lifting force provided by the wing-body <strong>of</strong> the vehicleD - drag force to the vehicle body, nacelle(s), landinggears, etc.,F f- friction force due to rolling resistanceThe functional form <strong>of</strong> these forces has been derived fromdimensional analysis (review your math course notes) andfrom extensive knowledge <strong>of</strong> fluid mechanics (windtunnels and water tank experiments)Virginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 27


Functional Forms <strong>of</strong> the ForcesThe functional form <strong>of</strong> these forces is as follows:L=1--!V 2 SC L2(15)D=1--!V 2 SC D2(16)T = f( V , !)F f = ( mg cos)– L)f roll(17)(18)V is the vehicle speed (TAS), ! is the air density (kg/m 3 ), Sis the aircraft gross wing area, C L is the lift coefficient(nondimensional), C D is the drag coefficient(nondimensional), f roll is the rolling friction coefficient(nondimensional), is the engine thrust iin Newtons andTVirginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 28


) is the angle comprised between the runway planeand the horizontalVirginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 29


Notes on Various Parameters1) C L and C D are specific to each airframe-flapconfiguration2) f roll is usually a function <strong>of</strong> runway surface conditionsand aircraft speedT (N)Sea Levelf rollBias-Ply TireHigh ElevationRadial TireV (m/s)V (m/sec)V (m/s)V (m/sec)Figure 2. Typical Variations <strong>of</strong> T and with <strong>Air</strong>craft Speed.f rollVirginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 30


Estimating Runway AccelerationUsing Newton's second law and summing forces in thehorizontal direction <strong>of</strong> motion ( x),ma x = T( V , !)– D– ( mg cos) – L)f roll – mg sin)(19)linear variations <strong>of</strong> T (tractive effort or thrust) and f roll canbe assumed to be linear with respect to airspeed for therange <strong>of</strong> speed values encountered in practice. For smallangles this equation can be expressed as,ma x = T( V , !) – D – ( mg – L)f roll(20)ma x = T( V , !)11– --! V 2 sc D – mg – --! V 2 SC L2 # % 2 $& froll(21)1a x = --- ( T(V , ! )m+1--! V 2 S( C L f roll – C D ) – mgf roll2(22)Virginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 31


Remarks About the <strong>Air</strong>craft AccelerationEquation• The acceleration capability <strong>of</strong> the aircraft decreases asspeed is gained during the take<strong>of</strong>f roll due to a reductionin the thrust produced by the engines• If Eq. 22 is integrated twice between an initial speed, V 0and the lift-<strong>of</strong>f speed, V lo the distance traversed during thetake<strong>of</strong>f roll can be found• Usually this requires a computer simulation since manyparameters such as T and f roll vary with speed (timevarying) making the coefficient <strong>of</strong> the differentialequation <strong>of</strong> motion time dependent.Virginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 32


Aerodynamic Coefficients• The flap setting affects C D and C L and hence affectsacceleration and runway length required for a take<strong>of</strong>f.Typical variations <strong>of</strong> C D with flap angle are shown belowC DConstant Angle <strong>of</strong> AttackC LConstant Angle <strong>of</strong> Attack5 10 15 20 255 10 15 20 25Flap Angle (degrees)Flap Angle (degrees)Figure 3.Typical Variations <strong>of</strong> C D and C L with <strong>Air</strong>craft Wing Flap Angle.Virginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 33


Flap Angle• Angle formed between the flap chord and the wing chord• Flaps are used to increase lift (but they increase drag too)during take<strong>of</strong>f and landing maneuvers• Flaps reduce the stalling speed <strong>of</strong> the aircraftWing cross section(cruise condition)Wing cross section(landing and take<strong>of</strong>f)Flap angleVirginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 34


Remarks About Aerodynamic Coefficients• An increase in flap angle increases both C L and C D .However, these increments are not linear andconsequently are more difficult to interpret• Increasing the flap angle * f increases and thusreduces the lift-<strong>of</strong>f speed required for take<strong>of</strong>f due to anincrease in the lifting force generated.( ) C LC D• Increments in flap angle increases the value <strong>of</strong> morerapidly which tends to reduce more drastically theacceleration <strong>of</strong> the aircraft on the runway thus increasingthe runway length necessary to reach the lift <strong>of</strong>f speedVirginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 35


Remarks• The mass <strong>of</strong> the aircraft affects its acceleration(according to Newton’s second law).+ Larger take<strong>of</strong>f masses produce corresponding increments in therunway length requirement.• The density <strong>of</strong> the air,!decreases with altitude+ Lower thrust generation capability at high airfield elevations+ The runway length increases as the field elevation increases+ The density also affects the second and third terms in Equation2.10 (less drag at higher altitude)Virginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 36


<strong>Air</strong>craft Operational Practices (Take<strong>of</strong>f)• At small flap settings (i.e., 5 or 10 degrees) the take<strong>of</strong>frunway length is increased due to small gains in C L (littleincrease in the lifting force). Useful for high-hot take<strong>of</strong>fconditions.• At medium flap angle settings (15-25 degrees) the gainsin lift usually override those <strong>of</strong> the drag force. These arethe flap settings typically used for take<strong>of</strong>f except underextremely abnormal airport environments such as highelevation, hot temperature airport conditions and highaircraft weights or a combination <strong>of</strong> both. Note that themaximum allowable take<strong>of</strong>f weight (MTOW)increases as the take<strong>of</strong>f flap setting is reduced.Virginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 37


• At large flap angles (> 25 degrees) C D is excessiveand the airplane requires unreasonable large take<strong>of</strong>frunway lengths. These flap settings are only used forlanding since pilots want to land at the lowest speedpossible thus reducing runway length.Virginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 38


Application <strong>of</strong> Equations <strong>of</strong> Motion to Take<strong>of</strong>fRunway Length Requirements• Equation 22 describes the motion <strong>of</strong> an air vehicle as itaccelerates on a runway from an initial speed V o to a finallift<strong>of</strong>f speed V l<strong>of</strong>• This equation can be integrated twice with respect totime to obtain the distance traveled from a starting pointto the point <strong>of</strong> lift<strong>of</strong>f• With a little more effort we could also predict thedistance required to clear a 35 ft. obstacle as required byFederal Aviation Regulations Part 25 or 23 that setsairworthiness criteria for aircraft in the U.S.• <strong>Air</strong>port engineers use tabular or graphical data derivedfrom this integration procedureVirginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 39


A Word on Stalling and Lift-<strong>of</strong>f SpeedsThe stalling speed can be estimated from the basic liftequationL=1--!V 2 SC L2Under steady flight conditionsL+mgso,V=2mg------------!SC LdefinethenC Lmaxas the maximum attainable lift coefficient,V stall=2mg-----------------!SC LmaxVirginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 40


FAR Regulation PrinciplesRegulations (FAR 25) specify that:• <strong>Air</strong>craft should lift <strong>of</strong>f at 10% above the stalling speed( V l<strong>of</strong> )• <strong>Air</strong>craft climb initially at 20% above the stalling speed( V 2 )• <strong>Air</strong>craft speed during a regular approach be 30% abovethe stalling speed ( V app )• During take<strong>of</strong>f aircraft should clear an imaginary 11 m(35 ft.) obstacle• During landing aircraft should cross the runwaythreshold 15 m (50 ft.) above ground)Virginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 41


These considerations are necessary to estimatetake<strong>of</strong>f and landing distances (and thus size runwaylength)Virginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 42


Variation <strong>of</strong> Approach Speed with <strong>Air</strong>craft Mass<strong>Air</strong>craft Mass x 10 4Virginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 43


Integration <strong>of</strong> Acceleration EquationFirst obtain the aircraft speed at time t,1 1V t = --- ( T ( V, ! ) + --!V 2 S( C Lf roll – C D ) – mg f roll ) dtm 2V l<strong>of</strong>"V o(23)Now get the distance traveled,S tD"l<strong>of</strong>oS t = V t dt(24)Virginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 44


Sample Results (Boeing 727-200 Data)The following results apply to a medium-size transportaircraft32.5Sea Level1250 m22500 m1.510 10 20 30 40 50Roll Time (s)Figure 4.Sensitivity <strong>of</strong> <strong>Air</strong>craft Acceleration vs. Field Elevation.Virginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 45


<strong>Air</strong>craft Speed During Take<strong>of</strong>f RollNote how speed increases at a nonlinear pace120100Sea Level1250 m80602500 m402000 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40Roll Time (s)Figure 5.Sensitivity <strong>of</strong> <strong>Air</strong>craft Speed vs. Field Elevation.Virginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 46


Distance Traveled During the Take<strong>of</strong>f Roll35003000250020001250 mSea Level150010002500 m50000 10 20 30 40 50Roll Time (s)Figure 6.Lift-Off Distance vs. Field Elevation.Virginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 47


Take<strong>of</strong>f Roll Distance vs. <strong>Air</strong>craft Mass35003000250020002500 m. Field ElevationDTW = 60,000 kgDTW = 66,000 kg15001000500DTW = 72,000 kg00 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45Roll Time (s)Figure 7.Lift-Off Distance vs. <strong>Air</strong>craft Weight.Virginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 48


Regulatory Method to EstimateRunway Length at <strong>Air</strong>portsVirginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 49


General Procedure for Runway Length Estimation(Runway Length Components)Runways can have three basic components:• Full strength pavement (FS)• Clearways (CL)• Stopways (SW)Full strength pavement should support the full weight <strong>of</strong> the aircraftClearway is a prepared area are beyond FS clear <strong>of</strong> obstacles (maxslope is 1.5%) allowing the aircraft to climb safely to clear animaginary 11 m (35’ obstacle)Stopway is a paved surface that allows and aircraft overrun to takeplace without harming the vehicle structurally (cannot be used fortake<strong>of</strong>f)Virginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 50


Runway ComponentsEach runway end will have to be considered individually for runwaylength analysisStopway (SW)Clearway (CL)Full Strenght Pavement (FS)Virginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 51


FAR Certification ProceduresFAR 25 (for turbojet and turb<strong>of</strong>an powered aircraft) consider threecases in the estimation <strong>of</strong> runway length performance• Normal take<strong>of</strong>f (all engines working fine)• Engine-out take<strong>of</strong>f condition- Continued take<strong>of</strong>f- Aborted take<strong>of</strong>f• LandingAll these cases consider stochastic variations in piloting technique(usually very large for landings and smaller for take<strong>of</strong>fs)Regulations for piston aircraft do not include the normal take<strong>of</strong>f case(an engine-out condition is more critical in piston-powered aircraft)Virginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 52


NomenclatureFL = field length (total amount <strong>of</strong> runway needed)FS = full strength pavement distanceCL = clearway distanceSW = stopway distanceLOD = lift <strong>of</strong>f distanceTOR = take<strong>of</strong>f runTOD = take<strong>of</strong>f distanceLD = landing distanceSD = stopping distanceD35 = distance to clear an 11 m (35 ft.) obstacleVirginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 53


Landing Distance CaseThe landing distance should be 67% longer than the demonstrateddistance to stop an aircraftLarge landing roll variations exist among pilotsExample touchdown point variations (µ=400 m, ,=125 m for Boeing727-200 landing in Atlanta)LD = 1.667 * SDFS land = LDSD15 m (50 ft)LDVirginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 54


Normal Take<strong>of</strong>f CaseThe Take<strong>of</strong>f Distance (TOD) should be 115% longer than thedemonstrated Distance to Clear an 11m (35 ft.) obstacle (D35)CL nClearwayTOD n = 1.15 * D35 nLOD nD35 n11 m (35 ft)1.15 LOD nTOD n - 1.15 LOD nRelationshipsCL n = 1/2 (TOD-1.15 LOD)TOR n = TOD n - CL nFS n = TOR nFL n = FS n + CL nVirginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 55


Engine-Out Take<strong>of</strong>f CaseDictated by two scenarios:Continued take<strong>of</strong>f subcase• Actual distance to clear an imaginary 11 m (35 ft.) obstacle D35(with an engine-out)Aborted or rejected take<strong>of</strong>f subcase• Distance to accelerate and stop (DAS)Note: no correction is applied due to the rare nature <strong>of</strong> engine-outconditions in practice for turb<strong>of</strong>an/turbojet powered aircraftVirginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 56


Engine-Out <strong>Analysis</strong>V 1 = decision speedStopwayClearway11 m (35 ft)D35 eoD35 eo - LOD eoAborted Take<strong>of</strong>fFS eo-a = DAS - SWFL eo-a = FS eo-a + SWLOD eoDASContinued Take<strong>of</strong>fTOD eo = D35 eoCL eo = 1/2 (D35 eo -LOD eo )TOR eo = D35 eo - CL eoFS eo-c = TOR eoFL eo-c = FS eo-c + CL eoVirginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 57


Runway Length Procedures (AC 150/5325-4)Two different views <strong>of</strong> the problem:• For aircraft with MTOW up to 27,200 kg (60,000 lb.) use theaircraft grouping procedure- If MTOW is less than 5,670 kg use Figures 2-1 and 2-2 in FAA AC150/5325-4- If MTOW is > 5,670 kg but less than 27,200 kg use Figures 2-3 and 2-4 provided in Chapter 2 <strong>of</strong> the AC 150/5325-4• For aircraft whose MTOW is more than 27,200 kg (60,000 lb.) usethe critical aircraft concept- The critical aircraft is that one with the longest runway performancecharacteristics- This aircraft needs to be operated 250 times in the year from thatairportReview some examplesVirginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 58


Advisory Circular 150/5325-4Virginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 59


Contents <strong>of</strong> Advisory Circular 150/5325-4Be familiar with all items contained in FAA AC 150/5325-4• Chapter 1 - Introduction (background)• Chapter 2 - Runway length design based on aircraft groupings• Chapter 3 - Runway length design for specific aircraft- <strong>Air</strong>craft performance curves- <strong>Air</strong>craft performance tables• Chapter 4 - Design rationale- <strong>Air</strong>port temperature and elevation- Wind and runway surface- Difference in runway centerline elevations• NOTE: The runway length procedure using declared the distanceconcept is outlined in FAA AC 150/5300-13Virginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 60


Advisory Circular 150/5325-4The following examples illustrates the use <strong>of</strong> Figures 2-1 through 2-4in AC 150/5325-4• These procedures apply to a collection <strong>of</strong> aircraft (a group <strong>of</strong>aircraft)• The process requires correction <strong>of</strong> runway length due to runwayslope and wet pavement conditions- Wet pavement correction is critical for landing aircraft- Runway gradient (or slope) is critical for departing aircraft- Apply the largest correction possibleVirginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 61


Groupings Method AC 150/5325-4 (Figure 2-1)Virginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 62


Example # 1 AC 150/5325-4Suppose we want to size a runway for a small general aviation airportall serving single engine aircraft (MTOW < 5,670 kg)The airport is to be located on plateau 915 m. above sea levelThe proposed airport site has a mean daily temperature <strong>of</strong> the hottestmonth <strong>of</strong> 24 o C (75 o F)Solution:Consulting Figure 2-1 in AC 150/5325-4 we obtain:RL = 4,600 ft. (or 1,403 m.)Virginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 63


Sample Calculations (FAA AC 150-5325-4 Individual <strong>Air</strong>craft)Virginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 64


Runway Length Requirements Using AC/150-5325-4Outline <strong>of</strong> runway length requirement procedures from FAAAdvisory AC 150/5325-4.The method considers take<strong>of</strong>f and landing phases as independentevents. This method already factors for a take<strong>of</strong>f engine failure andwet runways in the solution. Three intermediate computations are:NOTE: the new advisory circular has eliminated a large number<strong>of</strong> aircraft tables. The procedure advocated by the new advisorycircular is to use design charts provided by each aircraftmanufacturer for aircraft above 60,000 lb. (MTOW)I) Landing <strong>Analysis</strong>Estimate the maximum allowable landing weight (MALW) at thegiven airport conditions.Compare this MALW with that <strong>of</strong> the desired weight (DTW).Virginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 65


a) If MALW > DTW use DTW in your computationsb) If MALW < DTW use MALW for in your computations.FAA method - Estimate the runway length required and use theshortest Landing Runway Length <strong>of</strong> all possible flap configurationsallowed.NOTE: This method is dangerous because if an engine failure occursafter take<strong>of</strong>f and the pilot would want to come back and land theaircraft it would have to dump large amounts <strong>of</strong> fuel. Using the lowestflap setting provides a safer design and thus can be used instead.II) Take<strong>of</strong>f <strong>Analysis</strong>a) Estimate the desired take<strong>of</strong>f weight (DTW) for payload/range dataprovided.DTW = OEW + FW + PYLwhere:Virginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 66


OEW = Operating empty weightPYL = PayloadFW = Fuel weight (be sure to include reserve fuel)b) Estimate the maximum allowable take<strong>of</strong>f weight for each flapsetting (allowable)NOTE: Discard those flap settings that do not allow a take<strong>of</strong>f atDTW.c) For each flap setting/aircraft operation combination find referencefactors and required take<strong>of</strong>f distances.NOTE: This procedure is executed in two steps.d) Select the shortest runway length from step (c) as this will be thepilot’s choice from an operational point <strong>of</strong> view since pilots wouldlike to depart using the shortest take<strong>of</strong>f roll possible.e) Adjust the take<strong>of</strong>f runway length as needed for effective gradient.Virginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 67


III) Landing and Take<strong>of</strong>f Runway Length ReconciliationOnce the previous computations have been done select the longestrunway length <strong>of</strong> this method.Virginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 68


Sample Computation (Old Tabular Method)• Boeing 727-200 with Pratt and Whitney JTD8-15 engines• 20 o mean daily maximum temperature <strong>of</strong> the hottest month• 1000 m. field elevation• 1,200 statute mile stage length• 150 passengers• Maximum difference in elevation <strong>of</strong> runway centerlines is 30 ft.Virginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 69


I) Landing <strong>Analysis</strong>a) Estimate the Desired Take<strong>of</strong>f Weight (DTW) as a preliminary stepDTW = OEW + FW + PAYOEW = 54,325 kg. (from table AC 150/5325-4)FW = (6.2 kg/km) (1200) (1.609) = 11,970.96 kg.PAY = (150 Pax/kg) (100 kg) = 15,000 kg.DTW = 54,325 + 15,000 + 11,970.96 + 0DTW = 81,296 kg. OK, below MTOW (maximum allowablestructural weight)For several flap settings (- f )the following numbers were obtained.Note that using a flap setting <strong>of</strong> 40 degrees will exceed the MALWfor this flap setting and thus 40 degrees is not recommended for alanding in case <strong>of</strong> an engine failure and return to the airfield. In thisVirginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 70


case the small flap setting is used because the aircraft is notcapable <strong>of</strong> landing at the departing airport even after all the fuel hasbeen expended.- f(Deg.)MALW(kg)ELWa (kg.)40 64,600 69,325*Runway(m)Check30 72,500 69,325 1,777.50 NOa.ELW stands for emergency landing weight(assuming all fuel is dumped after take<strong>of</strong>f toreturn for a landing.Virginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 71


Simple interpolation for a flap angle <strong>of</strong> 30 degrees yields arunway length needed <strong>of</strong> 1,777 meters thus is rounded <strong>of</strong>f to thenearest largest integer, say 1,800 m.Weight(kg.)72,000(72,500)74,000Elevation = 1000mts.1,765( ? )1,815R 0f = 30f= 1777.50 mR L0S30== 1,800 mVirginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 72


- f2520155II) Take<strong>of</strong>f <strong>Analysis</strong>a) Recall the desired take<strong>of</strong>f weight DTW = 82,396 kg.b) Verify all flap settings that will allow the aircraft to execute a safetake<strong>of</strong>f.The following table illustrates all possible flap angle take<strong>of</strong>fconfigurations for the Boeing 727-200.(Deg.) MTOW (kg) Check76,50081,80086,90089,400Note that the aircraft can use 3 flap settings at this elevation/payloadcombination. Therefore, 3 options for runway length requirementsneed to be investigated.NO aOKOKOKa.DTW is greater than the maximum allowable take<strong>of</strong>f weight so do not consider.Virginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 73


c) Compute the take<strong>of</strong>f runway length requirements for allpermissible flap angle configurations.- f (Deg.) “R” Factor RL TO (mts.) “Round Off” (m)2015570.6074.3084.502,6962,8623,3032,7002,9003,300- fd) The values <strong>of</strong> runway length were obtained using double linearinterpolation from each table (see AC 150/5325-4 for a samplecomputation). The optimum flap angle for these conditions is =20 0 and the one that should be used by pilots and airport engineers tosize the runway. the resulting runway length is 2,800 m.e) Correct for runway gradient. For a 30 ft. change in elevation isequivalent to 9.146 m. For a 2,700 m. runway this implies a 0.339%effective gradient Increase 10% for every 1% in effective gradientR LTO = ( 2,700) ( 1.0339) = 2,787.40rounding <strong>of</strong>f we get 2,800 m <strong>of</strong> runway needed for take<strong>of</strong>f.Virginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 74


III) Landing and Take<strong>of</strong>f Runway LengthReconciliationSince the runway needed for take<strong>of</strong>f is larger than that required toland select the take<strong>of</strong>f runway length as this is the critical dimension.RL = 2,800 metersNOTE: This procedure accounts for wet runways so no furthercorrection is needed.Virginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 75


Runway Length <strong>Analysis</strong> using<strong>Air</strong>craft Manufacturer Data for<strong>Air</strong>port DesignVirginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 76


Boeing 777-200 High Gross WeightEstimate the runway length to operate a Boeing 777-200 High GrossWeight (HGW) from Washington Dulles to Sao Paulo Guarulhosairport in Brasil (a stage length <strong>of</strong> 4,200 nm) at Mach .84.After consultation with the airline you learned that their B777s have agross weight <strong>of</strong> 592,000 lb. (HGW option) and have a standard threeclassseating arrangement.The airline has B 777-200 HGW withGeneral Electric engines. Assume hot day conditions.Virginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 77


IAD-BGR TripIAD4,200 nmBGRVirginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 78


Discussion <strong>of</strong> Computations1) Estimation <strong>of</strong> Desired Take<strong>of</strong>f Weight (DTW)where:DTW = PYL + OEW + FWPYLis the payload carried (passengers and cargo)OEWis the operating empty weightFWis the fuel weight to be carried (usually includes reserve fuel)Note: PYL and OEW can be easily computedVirginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 79


Boeing 777-200 (GE Engines)Virginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 80


Computation <strong>of</strong> Payload and OEWJust look at the tables for the specific aircraft:OEW = 592,000 lb. = 138,100 kg.PYL = (305 passengers)(200 lb. /passengers) = 61,000 lb. = 27,727kg.OEW + PYL = 165,827 kg. = 364,820 lb.The fuel weight requires knowledge <strong>of</strong> fuel consumption rates duringthe flight. These can be extracted from the Payload-Range diagramnext.Virginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 81


Computation <strong>of</strong> Fuel WeightThis analysis requires information on fuel consumption for thisaircraft flying at a specific cruising condition. Use the payload rangediagram <strong>of</strong> the aircraft to estimate the average fuel consumption inthe trip.The Payload-Range Diagram is a composite plot that shows theoperational trade-<strong>of</strong>f to carry fuel and payload.• As the payload carried increases the amount <strong>of</strong> fuel to conduct aflight might be decreased thus reducing the actual range (distance)<strong>of</strong> the mission• P-R diagrams consider operational weight limits such as MZFW,MTOW and MSPLVirginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 82


Range-Payload Diagram for Boeing 777-200(I)(II)(III)Virginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 83


Explanation <strong>of</strong> Payload-Range DiagramBoundariesFrom this diagram three corner points representing combinations <strong>of</strong>range and payload are labeled with roman numerals (I-III). Anexplanation <strong>of</strong> these points follows.Operating point (I) represents an operational point where theaircraft carries its maximum payload at departs the origin airport atmaximum take<strong>of</strong>f gross weight (note the brake release gross weightboundary) <strong>of</strong> 297.6 metric tons.The corresponding range for condition (I) is a little less than 5,900nautical miles. Note that under this conditions the aircraft can carryits maximum useful payload limit <strong>of</strong> 56,900 kg (subtract 195,000 kg.from 138,100 kg. which is the OEW for this aircraft).Virginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 84


Payload-Range Diagrams ExplanationsOperating Point (II) illustrates a range-payload compromise whenthe fuel tanks <strong>of</strong> the aircraft are full (note the fuel capacity limitboundary).Under this condition the aircraft travels 8,600 nm but can only carry20,900 kg <strong>of</strong> payload (includes cargo and passengers), and a fuelcomplement <strong>of</strong> fuel (171,100 liters or 137,460 kg.).The total brake release gross weight is still 297.6 metric tons forcondition (II).Virginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 85


Payload-Range Diagrams ExplanationsOperating Point (III) represents the ferry range condition where theaircraft departs with maximum fuel on board and zero payload. Thiscondition is typically used when the aircraft is delivered to itscustomer (i.e., the airline) or when a non-critical malfunctionprecludes the carrying <strong>of</strong> passengers.This operating point would allow this aircraft to cover 9,600 nauticalmiles with 137,460 kg.<strong>of</strong> fuel on board and zero payload for a brakerelease gross weight <strong>of</strong> 275,560 kg. (137,460 + 138,100 kg.) or belowMTOW.Virginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 86


Limitations <strong>of</strong> P-R Diagram InformationA note <strong>of</strong> caution about payload range diagrams is that they onlyapply to a given set <strong>of</strong> flight conditions.For example, the previous Payload-Range diagram is only applicableto zero wind conditions, 0.84 Mach, standard day conditions (e.g.,standard atmosphere) and <strong>Air</strong> Transport Association (ATA) domesticfuel reserves (this implies enough fuel to fly 1.25 hours at economyspeed at the destination point).If any <strong>of</strong> these conditions changes so does the payload-rangediagram. Later on we examine the sensitivity <strong>of</strong> Range to variousother conditions.Virginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 87


Sample Payload Range DiagramsPayload RangeDiagrams (B747)Virginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 88


Payload Range Diagrams (B767)Virginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 89


Payload Range Diagrams (B777)Virginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 90


Payload Range Diagrams (B757)Virginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 91


Payload Range Diagrams (A320)Virginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 92


Payload Range Dagrams (A330)Virginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 93


Payload Range Dagrams (A380)Virginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 94


Back to Our Problem!Our critical aircraft flying (B777-200 HGW option) would fly 4,200nm with full passengers.• From the P-R diagram read <strong>of</strong>f the DTW as ~230,000 kg.• OEW + PYL = 165,827 kg.• The amount <strong>of</strong> fuel carried for the trip would be:FW = DTW - OEW - PYLFW = 64,173 kg.Since the P-R diagram tells us the DTW we could even skip the fuelcomputation and use DTW in our runway length analysis directly(see following pages).Virginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 95


Presentation <strong>of</strong> Runway Length InformationFor the aircraft in question we have two sets <strong>of</strong> curves available tocompute runway length:• Take<strong>of</strong>f• LandingThese curves apply to specific airfield conditions so you shouldalways use good judgement in the analysis. Typically two sets <strong>of</strong>curves are presented by Boeing:• Standard day conditions• Standard day + .T conditionswhere .T represents some increment from standard day conditions(typically 15 o ).Virginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 96


Boeing 777-200 HGW Take<strong>of</strong>f PerformanceVirginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 97


Boeing 777-200 HGW Take<strong>of</strong>f PerformanceVirginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 98


Take<strong>of</strong>f Runway Length <strong>Analysis</strong>From the performance chart we conclude:• RL take<strong>of</strong>f = 1,950 m.• Optimum flap setting = 20 degrees for take<strong>of</strong>f (see flap settinglines in the diagram)• DTW is way below the maximum capability for this aircraft.Virginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 99


Landing <strong>Analysis</strong>This analysis is similar to that performed under FAA AC 150/5325-4.Consider an emergency situation and compute the landing weight atthe departing airport.DTW = 230,000 kg.The maximum allowable landing weight for the aircraft is:MALW = 208,700 kg.Since DTW > MALW use MALW in the rest <strong>of</strong> the calculations.RL land = 1,850 m.Virginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 100


Boeing 777-200 HGW Landing PerformanceVirginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 101


Reconcile Take<strong>of</strong>f and Landing CasesSelect worst case scenario and use that as runway length requirement.RL take<strong>of</strong>f = 1,950 m.RL land = 1,850 m.Take<strong>of</strong>f dominates so use the RL take<strong>of</strong>f as the design number.Virginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 102


Observe Some Trends from Take<strong>of</strong>f Curves• If DTW increases the RL values increase non-linearly (explainusing the fundamental aircraft acceleration equation)• As field elevation increases (pressure altitude) the RL valuesincrease as well (temperature effect on air density)• As DTW and field elevation increase the optimum flap setting fortake<strong>of</strong>f decreases- This is consistent with our knowledge <strong>of</strong> C d and C L . Hot and highairfield elevations require very low flap settings during take<strong>of</strong>f toreduce the drag <strong>of</strong> the aircraft.• High airfield elevations (and large to moderate DTWs) could hit atire speed limit boundary. <strong>Air</strong>craft tires are certified to this limitand thus an airline would never dare to depart beyond this physicalboundary.Virginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 103


Other Considerations in Runway Length <strong>Analysis</strong>• So far the runway length analysis assumed that we haveplenty <strong>of</strong> land to build the runway.• There are many practical situations when this is not true.• Under land limited conditions use the Declared DistanceConcept for runway length estimation described inAppendix 14 <strong>of</strong> FAA AC 150/5300-13.• The application <strong>of</strong> declared distance is done on a caseby-casebasis and should be part <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Air</strong>port LayoutPlan (ALP)Virginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 104


Basic ConceptAccording to the FAA “by treating the airplane's runway performancedistances independently, provides an alternative airport designmethodology by declaring distances to satisfy the airplane's take<strong>of</strong>frun, take<strong>of</strong>f distance, accelerate-stop distance, and landingrequirements”.Declared distances are:• Take<strong>of</strong>f Run Available (TORA)• Take<strong>of</strong>f Distance Available (TODA)• Accelerate to Stop Distance Available (ASDA)• Landing Distance Available (LDA).Virginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 105


Some Runway Design TermsThe following are some definitions <strong>of</strong> terms employed in the declareddistance concept analysis.Runway Safety Area (RSA) -Runway Protection Zone (RPZ)Runway Object Free Area (ROFA)These critical runway areas are defined in Chapters 2 and 3 <strong>of</strong> theFAA AC 150/5300-13Virginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 106


Runway Protection Zone (RPZ)Trapezoidal shape area at the end <strong>of</strong> every runway and centered withthe runway centerlineTwo components make up the PRZ:• Controlled activity area• A portion <strong>of</strong> the Runway Object Free Area (ROFA)According to the FAA AC 5300-13 the function <strong>of</strong> the RPZ is to“enhance the protection <strong>of</strong> people and property on the ground.”• The airport controls the RPZ• RPZ are clear <strong>of</strong> incompatible objects• Ideally the control is exercised by buying the land <strong>of</strong> the RPZVirginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 107


Sketch <strong>of</strong> RPZVirginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 108


RPZ Dimensions (Table 2.4 in AC 5300-13)Virginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 109


Runway Object Free Area (ROFA or OFA)The runway object free area (OFA) is centered on the runwaycenterline and extends beyond the runway thresholds.Clearing standards:• no ground objects protruding above the runway safety area edgeelevation• Navigation equipment can be located inside OFA• Maneuvering aircraft OK• No parked aircraft or agricultural operations are allowed insideOFACheck out Tables 3.1 through 3.3 for OFA dimensional standards.Virginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 110


OFA Dimensions (Approach Cat. A/B and 3/4 mile)Virginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 111


OFA Dimensions (Approach Cat. C and D)Virginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 112


Runway Safety Area (RSA)Another area surrounding the runway that should be clear <strong>of</strong> objects,except for objects that need to be located in the runway or taxiwaysafety area because <strong>of</strong> their function (i.e., navigation equipment)• Objects higher than 3 inches (7.6 cm) should be mounted onfrangible structures• Manholes should be constructed at grade (or 7.6 cm. in height atmost)• No underground fuel storage facilities are allowed inside RSA (ortaxiway safety areas)Check out Tables 3.1 through 3.3 for RSA dimensional standards.Virginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 113


Example Runway Design for Boeing 777-200Assume a precision approach is needed for IFR conditionsRPZ =>• W 1 = 1,000 ft.• W 2 = 1,750 ft.• L = 2,500 ft.OFA• 800 ft. width and 1,000 ft. beyond runway endRSA• 500 ft. width and 1,000 ft. beyond runway endVirginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 114


Example Runway Design for Boeing 777-200OFARPZRunwayRSAVirginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 115


Climb PerformanceMany airport and airspace simulation models employsimplified algorithms to estimate aircraft climbperformance in the terminal area.TL(DmgVirginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 116


Basic Climb Performance <strong>Analysis</strong>The basic equations <strong>of</strong> motion along the climbing flightpath and normal to the flight path <strong>of</strong> an air vehicle are:dVm dt=T– D – mg sin((25)d(m V L – mg cos(dt(26)=Vwhere: m is the vehicle mass, is the airspeed, T and D are thetractive and drag forces, respectively; ( is the flight path angle. L isthe lift force and mg cos(is the gravitational component normal to theflight path.Virginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 117


Climb Performance Model SimplificationsFor small ( (flight path angle):sin(=T – D------------ –mg1dV--g dtwhere: the first term in the RHS accounts for possible changes inthe potential state <strong>of</strong> the vehicle (i.e., climb ability) and thesecond terms is the acceleration capability <strong>of</strong> the aircraft whileclimbing. Further algebraic manipulation yields,V sin(dh V[ T – D]= = --------------------- –dt mgVdV--g dtwhere: dh dt is the rate <strong>of</strong> climb and V is the true airspeed. Note thatif one neglects the second term (acceleration factor) assuming smallchanges in V as the vehicle climbs one can easily estimate the rate <strong>of</strong>the climb <strong>of</strong> the vehicle for a prescribed climb schedule.(27)Virginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 118


Incorporation <strong>of</strong> a Parabolic Drag Polar ModelLet lift and drag be expressed in the simple parabolicform,L=1--!SC L V 22(28)D=1--!SC D V 22where: C L and C D are the lift and drag coefficients (nondimensional),V is the airspeed, S is the wing area (reference area) and ! is thedensity <strong>of</strong> the air surrounding the vehicle.(29)Virginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 119


Final Derivation <strong>of</strong> Climb Rate ExpressionThe functional form <strong>of</strong> the lift and drag coefficients (simplest form is,C L,C D) in its2CC D = C D0 + C Di = C LD0 + -------------/ARe(30)C L=2mg-----------!SV 2(31)where: C D0 is the zero lift drag coefficient, and the second drag termaccounts for drag due to lift generation (i.e., induced drag).Then therate <strong>of</strong> climb function becomes,dhdt=1CV T (!,V)--!V 2 S C D0 ( M)L2 ( M,V)– 2 4 + --------------------- 352 0 /ARe 1--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------mg(32)Virginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 120


Mathematical Approximation for <strong>Air</strong>craftThrust and DragThrust and drag are two fundamental variables extracted fromwind-tunnel and flight tests.Drag CoefficientC D (total drag coefficient)C D0C DiThrust (KiloNewtons)200100Low SpeedBoundaryh = 0 m.h = 3000 m.High Speed Boundaryh = 6000 m.h = 9000 m.h = 12000 m.0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8Mach Number (M true )0.90.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9Mach Number (M true )Virginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 121


Modeling <strong>Air</strong>craft Thrust• Thrust is a function <strong>of</strong> aircraft speed and altitude• Basic thermodynamics dictates that thrust is the netresult <strong>of</strong> the speed differential between inlet and outlet <strong>of</strong>the engine<strong>Air</strong> Flowp oTurbinep eCompressorCombustionChamberV oT = f(V f - V o ) and f(p o -p e )V fVirginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 122


Basic Propulsion Forces Modeling Ideas• Thrust is a function <strong>of</strong> altitude (or density)+ A general thrust lapse function can be obtained using real enginedata (empirical data)• Thrust is a function <strong>of</strong> aircraft speed+ A more complex function can be obtained using real engine data(empirical data)+ The thrust losses during take<strong>of</strong>f troll are significant as illustratedin the figures below• Thrust functions are provided by the enginemanufacturer in terms <strong>of</strong> tables (thrust vs altitude andmach number and thrust specific fuel consumption vsaltitude and mach number)Virginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 123


Sample Thrust Variations (PW JT9D Engine)Observe the large variations <strong>of</strong> thrust with respect toaircraft altitudeMaximum Continuous ThrustVirginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 124


Modeling Thrust Using a Thrust Lapse GradientA simple way to model thrust as a function <strong>of</strong> altitude ispresented below:!T h Th0 ----# % $& m=! 0(33)where:T h is the thrust at altitude, T 0is the sea level static thrust,! h ! 0and are the density values at altitude and at sealevel, respectivelymis an empirical coefficient derived from real dataVirginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 125


Take<strong>of</strong>f Thrust Variations with SpeedRolls-Royce RB211-535E4EngineThrust ratio = T v / T staticSource: Mair and Birdsall (1992)Virginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 126


Variations <strong>of</strong> Climb TSFC (PW JT9D Engine)Virginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 127


Variations <strong>of</strong> Cruise TSFC (PW JT9D Engine)Virginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 128


Sample Climb Trajectory ResultsNumerical integration <strong>of</strong> equation (30) for a given flight speedschedule (speed time history) yields the following climb pr<strong>of</strong>iles.30000Four engine, turb<strong>of</strong>an-powered aircraftBoeing 747-200B <strong>Air</strong>craft DataTake<strong>of</strong>f Weight = 750,000 lbsClimb Pr<strong>of</strong>ile25000ISAISA+20Altitude (ft.)200001500010000Speed Schedule250 KIAS < 10 kft300 KIAS > 10 kft500000255075100125150175200225250Distance Traveled (n.m.)Virginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 129


Typical Rate <strong>of</strong> Climb EnvelopeIterative analysis <strong>of</strong> the rate <strong>of</strong> climb equation yields thefollowing results across the complete flight envelope.Rate <strong>of</strong> Climb (m/min.)1000600200Optimum Rate <strong>of</strong> Climb Pointsh = 0 m.h = 3,000 m.h = 6,000 m.h = 9,000 m.h = 12,000 m.0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9True Mach NumberVirginia Tech - <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Systems</strong> Laboratory 130

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!