Recommended SolutionThe Administration is recommending several reforms and new initiatives for Title VII <strong>of</strong> thefarm bill – entitled “Research and Related Matters.” Following is a list <strong>of</strong> the major components<strong>of</strong> the package.1. Consolidate <strong><strong>US</strong>DA</strong>’s Agricultural Research Service (ARS) and the Cooperative StateResearch, Education, and Extension Service (CSREES) into a single agency named theResearch, Education, and Extension Service (REES), which will coordinate bothintramural and extramural research, extension, and education programs. (For furtherinformation, see the proposal entitled “Research, Education And Economics (REE)Mission Area Reorganization” on pages 127– 128.)2. Rename the Research, Education, and Economics (REE) mission area the Office <strong>of</strong>Science. (For further information, see the proposal entitled “Research, Education AndEconomics (REE) Mission Area Reorganization” on pages 127 – 128.)3. Establish an annual $50 million Agricultural Bio-Energy and Bio-Based ProductsResearch Initiative to advance fundamental scientific knowledge for the improvedproduction <strong>of</strong> renewable fuels and bio-based products. (For further information, see theproposal entitled “Agricultural Bio-Energy and Bio-Based Products Research Initiative”on pages 129 – 130.)4. Establish an annual $100 million Specialty Crop Research Initiative to provide sciencebasedtools for the specialty crop industry. (For further information, see the proposalentitled “Specialty Crop Research Initiative” on pages 131 – 132.)5. Authorize <strong><strong>US</strong>DA</strong> to conduct research and diagnostics for highly infectious foreign animaldiseases on mainland locations in the U.S. (For further information, see the proposalentitled “Foreign Animal Disease Research” on page 133.)6. Invest an additional $10 million in mandatory funding to be available until expended fororganic research. This new funding would focus on conservation and environmentaloutcomes and new and improved seed varieties especially suited for organic agriculture.(For further information, see the proposal entitled “Organic <strong>Farm</strong>ing Initiatives” on pages166 – 167.)<strong><strong>US</strong>DA</strong> <strong>2007</strong> <strong>Farm</strong> <strong>Bill</strong> <strong>Proposals</strong> Page 126 <strong>of</strong> 183
RESEARCH, EDUCATION AND ECONOMICS (REE)MISSION AREA REORGANIZATIONRecommendation In BriefConsolidate <strong><strong>US</strong>DA</strong>’s Agricultural Research Service (ARS) and the Cooperative State Research,Education, and Extension Service (CSREES) into a single agency named the Research,Education, and Extension Service (REES), which will coordinate both intramural and extramuralresearch, extension, and education programs. Rename the Research, Education, and Economics(REE) mission area the Office <strong>of</strong> Science.Problem<strong><strong>US</strong>DA</strong> currently has two separate agencies responsible for agricultural science. CSREESsupports extramural programs (external <strong>of</strong> <strong><strong>US</strong>DA</strong>), while ARS conducts intramural research(internal to <strong><strong>US</strong>DA</strong>). Both agencies support basic and applied research spanning the full spectrum<strong>of</strong> agriculture related issues including plant and animal systems, food and nutrition, and naturalresources. Each agency maintains a separate National Program Staff (NPS) to manage programsand resources across these areas, leading to redundancy and administrative costs that couldinstead be invested in research and education.Consolidating agency administrations will ensure that <strong><strong>US</strong>DA</strong>’s intramural and extramuralscience programs are well-coordinated and are maximizing resources. In addition, consolidation<strong>of</strong> the two agencies will ensure <strong><strong>US</strong>DA</strong>’s research arm is able to respond to emerging issues andaddress some <strong>of</strong> the most critical issues facing agriculture.Additionally, the current structure can be confusing to <strong><strong>US</strong>DA</strong> partners and stakeholders. Concernregarding this issue was raised during the <strong>Farm</strong> <strong>Bill</strong> Forums. For example, Eugene from Iowaraised the following concern: “The <strong>Department</strong>’s dual research structure ARS/Land GrantUniversities has strengths and weaknesses but the intellectual and political challenges it faceshave never been more numerous or challenging….Is anyone really coordinating the <strong><strong>US</strong>DA</strong>’sresearch funding strategy?” And Steve, from California, expressed the need for “greatercoordination <strong>of</strong> research between government and colleges.”The Land Grant Universities have also called for more coordination <strong>of</strong> <strong><strong>US</strong>DA</strong>’s researchprograms. This is reflected in their Creating Research, Extension and Teaching for the 21 stCentury (CREATE-21) proposal, which advocates a consolidation <strong>of</strong> <strong><strong>US</strong>DA</strong>’s research agencies.Recommended SolutionThe Administration proposes the creation <strong>of</strong> the Research, Education and Extension Service(REES) through the merger <strong>of</strong> ARS and CSREES. This new agency would be under theleadership <strong>of</strong> a Chief Scientist. This person would have authority for REES program <strong>of</strong>fices,program implementation, and administrative and resource management.We propose retaining authorities for the 1890, 1994 and Hispanic Serving Institutions. However,a new consolidated authorization would be sought to support the overall REES program. Fundingunder this consolidated line item would be under the authority <strong>of</strong> the REES Chief Scientist and<strong><strong>US</strong>DA</strong> <strong>2007</strong> <strong>Farm</strong> <strong>Bill</strong> <strong>Proposals</strong> Page 127 <strong>of</strong> 183
- Page 1 and 2:
United States Department of Agricul
- Page 3 and 4:
Title IV - Nutrition Programs Tab 4
- Page 5 and 6:
TITLE ICOMMODITYPROGRAMSUSDA 2007 F
- Page 7 and 8:
prices…Let free market principles
- Page 9 and 10:
REVISE MARKETING ASSISTANCE LOANSRe
- Page 11 and 12:
panel has been established to rule
- Page 13 and 14:
BackgroundProducers may receive a n
- Page 15 and 16:
Additionally, to avoid jeopardizing
- Page 17 and 18:
BackgroundThe Direct Payment Progra
- Page 19 and 20:
If a payment is triggered, the nati
- Page 21 and 22:
STRENGTHEN PAYMENT AND ELIGIBILITY
- Page 23 and 24:
BackgroundA limitation on the total
- Page 25 and 26:
Recommended SolutionTo help rectify
- Page 27 and 28:
MILC payments would be based on 85
- Page 29 and 30:
program. On January 1, 2008, full i
- Page 31 and 32:
Europe (USNE). The decision concern
- Page 33 and 34:
market signals and what was in thei
- Page 35 and 36:
yield. Therefore, the amount of dir
- Page 37 and 38:
continue to receive the direct paym
- Page 39 and 40:
2. Successor Agreements. -- For pur
- Page 41 and 42:
SUMMARY OF CONSERVATION TITLE REFOR
- Page 43 and 44:
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY INCENTIVESPRO
- Page 45 and 46:
development of innovative practices
- Page 47 and 48:
existing resource concerns to the s
- Page 49 and 50:
PRIVATE LANDS PROTECTION PROGRAMRec
- Page 51 and 52:
CONSERVATION RESERVE PROGRAMRecomme
- Page 53 and 54:
WETLANDS RESERVE PROGRAMRecommendat
- Page 55 and 56:
IMPLEMENT “SOD SAVER” TO DISCOU
- Page 57 and 58:
CONSERVATION ACCESS FOR BEGINNING A
- Page 59 and 60:
MARKET-BASED APPROACH TO CONSERVATI
- Page 61 and 62:
MERIT-BASED FUNDING ALLOCATIONRecom
- Page 63 and 64:
farmland, which may include debris
- Page 65 and 66:
SUMMARY OF TRADE TITLE REFORMRecomm
- Page 67 and 68:
EXPAND TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE FOR SPE
- Page 69 and 70:
ENHANCE THE MARKET ACCESS PROGRAMRe
- Page 71 and 72:
GRANT PROGRAM TO ADDRESS SANITARY A
- Page 73 and 74:
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE TO RESOLVE TRA
- Page 75 and 76: TRADE CAPACITY BUILDING AND AGRICUL
- Page 77 and 78: ecent years, and repeal of the spec
- Page 79 and 80: REPEAL THE EXPORT ENHANCEMENT PROGR
- Page 81 and 82: PROVIDE CASH AUTHORITY FOR PORTION
- Page 83 and 84: TITLE IVNUTRITIONUSDA 2007 Farm Bil
- Page 85 and 86: accountable for these errors. (For
- Page 87 and 88: FOOD STAMP PROGRAM:Working Poor and
- Page 89 and 90: a statistically valid sample of Sta
- Page 91 and 92: have driven implementation of syste
- Page 93 and 94: problem, and there are few opportun
- Page 95 and 96: FOOD STAMP PROGRAM:IMPROVING HEALTH
- Page 97 and 98: THE EMERGENCY FOOD ASSISTANCE PROGR
- Page 99 and 100: FOOD DISTRIBUTION PROGRAM ON INDIAN
- Page 101 and 102: SENIOR FARMERS’ MARKET NUTRITION
- Page 103 and 104: PROMOTING HEALTHFUL DIETS IN SCHOOL
- Page 105 and 106: TITLE VCREDITUSDA 2007 Farm Bill Pr
- Page 107 and 108: Eliminate the $250,000 cap on the v
- Page 109 and 110: 3. Unmet SDA or beginning farmer ne
- Page 111 and 112: downpayment loan amount of $200,000
- Page 113 and 114: meet the credit needs of an increas
- Page 115 and 116: SUMMARY OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT TITLER
- Page 117 and 118: ADDRESS BACKLOG OF RURAL CRITICAL A
- Page 119 and 120: ENHANCING RURAL INFRASTRUCTURERecom
- Page 121 and 122: USDA’s community facilities progr
- Page 123 and 124: program; and consolidate the Sectio
- Page 125: SUMMARY OF RESEARCH TITLE REFORMRec
- Page 129 and 130: AGRICULTURAL BIOENERGY AND BIOBASED
- Page 131 and 132: SPECIALTY CROP RESEARCH INITIATIVER
- Page 133 and 134: FOREIGN ANIMAL DISEASE RESEARCHReco
- Page 135 and 136: SUMMARY OF FORESTRY TITLE REFORMRec
- Page 137 and 138: COMPREHENSIVE STATEWIDE FOREST PLAN
- Page 139 and 140: FOREST WOOD TO ENERGYRecommendation
- Page 141 and 142: COMMUNITY FORESTS WORKING LANDSPROG
- Page 143 and 144: SUMMARY OF SUPPORT OF RENEWABLEENER
- Page 145 and 146: CELLULOSIC BIOENERGY PROGRAMRecomme
- Page 147 and 148: EXPANSION OF BIOBASED PRODUCTS MARK
- Page 149 and 150: SUMMARY OF MISCELLANEOUS TITLE REFO
- Page 151 and 152: CROP INSURANCESUPPLEMENTAL DEDUCTIB
- Page 153 and 154: payment. If the county yield is 80
- Page 155 and 156: ACCESS TO CROP INSURANCEDATA MINING
- Page 157 and 158: STRENGTHEN CROP INSURANCEPROGRAM CO
- Page 159 and 160: CROP INSURANCERESEARCH AND DEVELOPM
- Page 161 and 162: CROP INSURANCESTANDARD REINSURANCE
- Page 163 and 164: INCREASE CROP INSURANCE PARTICIPATI
- Page 165 and 166: ENSURING FAIRNESS OF DAIRY RESEARCH
- Page 167 and 168: plan crop plantings and make market
- Page 169 and 170: USDA would also consider offering v
- Page 171 and 172: SUMMARY OF SPECIALTY CROP SUPPORTRe
- Page 173 and 174: Reauthorize the Emergency Food Assi
- Page 175 and 176: SUMMARY OF SUPPORT OF BEGINNING FAR
- Page 177 and 178:
SUMMARY XIIISOCIALLYDISADVANTAGEDPR
- Page 179 and 180:
eginning farmers buying power by in
- Page 181 and 182:
ADMINISTRATION'S FARM BILL PROPOSAL
- Page 183:
ADMINISTRATION'S FARM BILL PROPOSAL