Circle wise list of farmers who have submitted objections against the ...

10.11.12.13.14.Majeed Sheikh, NazirSheikh ,Rashid SheikhS/O Mohd SultanSheikhGh Rasool Wani S/ORehman WaniMushtaq Ahmad DarS/O Mohd Akbar DarAb Majeed Dar S/OMohd Akbar DarManzoor Ahmad Wani,Ali Mohd S/O AziziRigooKhrewKhrewKhrewKhrewKhrew15. Jalla Bhat S/O Aziz Bhat Khrew16.17.18.19.Haleema D/O KhazirBhatGh Hassan Darzi S/O GhMohd DarziAssad Lone, Anwar,Naba Lone S/O KarimLoneGh Hassan, Majid, Ss/ORasool Sheikh & MohiUd Din S/O Assad BhatKhrewKhrewKhrewKhrewLess area shownby 3kArea Published 1K10M instead of 3k5mArea Published 1Kinstead of 1k 15mArea Published 1K,12M instead of2kArea Published 1K12M instead of 2KArea Published 1K5m instead of 2kArea published10M instead of 1KrejuvenatedName does notexist in the listArea Published2K4m eachinstead of 2k 17mName does notexist in the final lit3 Kanals not rejuvenated asper guidelines, not verified byverification committeeThe plot measurement is 2k only outof which 10 m curtailment wasmade due to undersized corms sizeand deviation of guidelines.Area measured 1k9m out ofwhich 9m deducted due topoor plant geometryInputs have been issued only for1k 12m,the same has beenrejuvenated as per theGuidelines of the MissionArea offered 1k 12m andrejuvenated 1k 12M.Only 1k 5m rejuvenated underthe supervision of field staff .Only 10M rejuvenated underthe supervision of field staffSowing not done undersupervision of the field staffOnly 2K 4M rejuvenated byeach farmer as per theguidelines of the missionIn 1 st two case the plots wereinspected by verificationcommittee in routine checkup however field officersreported that the plots arenot laid under the guidelinesClaim rejectedClaim rejectedClaim rejectedClaim rejectedAs the inputs stands issued for1k 12m only hence claimrejected.Claim rejectedClaim rejectedClaim rejectedOnly 6k 12m was verified asper guidelines, claim notJustified.Claim rejectedDisposedDisposedDisposedDisposedDisposedDisposedDisposedDisposedDisposedDisposed